| Literature DB >> 33272266 |
Christie van Diggele1, Annette Burgess2,3, Craig Mellis4.
Abstract
A structured approach is critical to the success of any small group teaching session; preparation and planning are key elements in ensuring the session is systematic and effective. Learning activities guide and engage students towards the achievement of agreed learning outcomes. This paper introduces the central concepts of planning and preparing a small group teaching session. It provides an overview of key theoretical principles in lesson planning, delivery, and how to provide effective feedback in this setting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33272266 PMCID: PMC7712596 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-02281-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Fig. 1Bloom’s Taxonomy (adapted from Anderson et al., 2001 [6])
Fig. 2The learning cycle
Our proposed OAS method for lesson planning and teaching
| ‘Outcomes-Activity-Summary’ (OAS) | |
|---|---|
• Consider the background knowledge of students • Consider what you want the students to learn, understand, and be able to do by the end of the session • Establish your lesson goals and outcomes prior to the session • Share the learning outcomes with students at the start of the session • Allow the students input towards the learning outcomes | |
• Design appropriate learning activities aligned with the outcomes • Plan the activities and how you will engage the learners • Plan the classroom environment and seating arrangements • Ensure students are active participants in the lesson • Ensure your lesson delivery is stimulating and you have the students’ attention • Address students by their name, ask questions and get everyone involved to check their understanding • If clients/patients are involved, gain consent before participation | |
• Ask students to identify one new point/knowledge/skill learnt • Summarise the content or skills covered • Complete the lesson with a take-home message and a self-directed learning task • Ensure the lesson finishes on time • Evaluate your own teaching and take on board feedback from students |
The OAS method for lesson planning and teaching
| Examples of planning teaching sessions on childhood asthma using the OAS method | |
|---|---|
By the end of the session, students will be able to: • Identify and list the mechanisms of wheezing • Demonstrate a basic understanding of the pathophysiology of asthma • Identify different wheezing phenotypes in early childhood • List risk factors for development of asthma • Identify the requirements for lung function testing in airway obstruction, and especially its limitations in young children • Describe the principles of asthma management. | By the end of the session, students will be able to: • Recognise the difference between wheeze and stridor • Recognise increased work of breathing • Distinguish normal breath sounds from wheeze • Understand that young children may be difficult (or impossible) to examine clinically • Be aware that parents may be unhappy for students to examine their child. |
(group of 6–10 students) • Students will be provided with pre-reading (eg. a journal article) • A clinical case will be used, providing history, physical and investigations. • Students will be required to work in their group to: − make a diagnostic decision based on the history, physical and investigations. − create a mechanistic flow chart linking the presentation (signs and symptoms) to basic mechanisms in order to explain the diagnosis. − create a management plan (a table with goals, options and qualifying factors). | (group of 5–6 students) • If appropriate, students will be asked to contribute to taking a structured history from the parent/s, and examine the child for signs of increased work of breathing, and auscultation of the chest to detect any abnormal breath sounds. • The availability of appropriate patients (a co-operative wheezing child) may limit achieving some objectives. Role play and other teaching methods may be necessary. • Flexibility with bedside teaching activities is essential, as parents may not consent to being utilised in teaching. • Tutors must be very aware of any perceived discomfort by patient and/or parents, and discontinue the bedside teaching. |
• Given the high frequency of wheeze in young children, it is essential students have a good understanding of this common, important condition. • Note how early childhood wheeze differs from previous teaching on adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). | • Wheeze and shortness of breath is a very common clinical presentation in early childhood, and it is essential students can recognise this condition and initiate appropriate management. • Ensure you look for signs of chronic illness such as failure to thrive/ poor weight gain. |
Fig. 3Five key steps to designing your lesson or module
Overview of characteristics of PBL, TBL and CBL
| Pedagogy | Brief overview of characteristics |
|---|---|
| PBL is characterised by small group learning (6 to 10 students per group), using a guided learning format, with facilitation by one teacher. Learning takes place through problem-solving and self-study. Students initially meet to discuss the issues requiring further self-study, and then the group reconvenes to discuss and synthesise their learning. The facilitator is normally only present at the second meeting. | |
| TBL is characterised by a format that permits one content expert to effectively facilitate a large number of small groups (for example, 12 groups of 6 students in one classroom), it uses a ‘flipped classroom’ technique, and a structured in-class learning format. TBL follows a sequence of steps, including pre-class preparation, in-class individual test and team-test, immediate feedback, and problem-solving activities. | |
| CBL is characterised by small group learning (6–10 students per group), using an inquiry-based learning format, with facilitation by one teacher. Compared to PBL, CBL is less time consuming, and draws the focus of the students to key points of the clinical case. A structured and critical approach to clinical problem-solving is encouraged in CBL, where the facilitator is a content expert who directs and redirects the students. |
Fig. 4Lecture style seating, Group discussion seating, Discussion table seating (adapted from McKimm and Morris, 2009) [9]
Fig. 5Feedback model (data from Pendleton et al., 1984) [18]
• Successful teaching activities are well structured. • Use a structured format (such as the OAS method: ‘Outcome-Activity-Summary’) to plan and structure a small group learning session. • Clear learning outcomes, and alignment of activities and assessment are essential. • Provision of feedback is critical in ensuring learning is effective; formative assessment provides a structure for learner-centred feedback. |