| Literature DB >> 35309022 |
Pankaj Kundra1, Madhuri Kurdi2, Shikha Mehrotra3, Nikahat Jahan4, S Kiran4, Prasanna Vadhanan5.
Abstract
The National Medical Commission in its recent guidelines has stated that postgraduate training in anaesthesiology should have clear objectives and be competency based. This means that the existing teaching-learning (TL) methods need a major face-lift. E-learning and blended learning including learning management systems, virtual classrooms, app-based learning, flipped classroom, podcasts, webinars, web-based collaborative education, reflective feedback, problem-based discussions and mentorship are some newer TL methods that can be adopted. Simulation can help teach technical and non-technical skills such as leadership, teamwork and communication. In line with TL methods, newer assessment methods have to be applied to revolutionise postgraduate anaesthesia education. Formative assessment and assessment of clinical skills are important and to do this, workplace-based assessment methods such as mini-clinical evaluation exercise, direct observation of procedural skills, multisource feedback, logbook and E-portfolio can be applied. Objective structured clinical examination, simulation-based assessment and E-assessment are other useful evaluation methods. Copyright:Entities:
Keywords: Anaesthesia; competency-based education; education; learning; methods; simulation training; teaching
Year: 2022 PMID: 35309022 PMCID: PMC8929315 DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1103_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Anaesth ISSN: 0019-5049
Assessment methods and capabilities assessed
| Generic Professional Capabilities | CEX | MSF | DOPS | Simulation | CBD | OSCE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional values and behaviour | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Professional skills | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Professional knowledge | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capabilities in leadership and team working | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| Capabilities in patient safety and quality improvement | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Clinical skills | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| Technical skills | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Managing an operating list | ✓ | |||||
| Managing multidisciplinary working | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| Managing outpatient clinic | ✓ | ✓ | ||||
CEX: Clinical evaluation exercise; MSF: Multi-source feedback; DOPS: Direct Observation Procedural Skills; CBD: Case Based Discussion; OSCE: Objective Structured Clinical Examination
Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) Assessment Form
| Trainee [Post Graduate (PG)student] | Evaluator (Faculty) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name: R1/R2/R3: | Name: | |||||||
| Date: | ||||||||
| ASSESSOR FEEDBACK: | ||||||||
| Verbal and written feedback is a mandatory component of this assessment. | ||||||||
| General | ||||||||
| Strengths | ||||||||
| Development needs | ||||||||
| Recommended actions | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| I need the assessor in the theatre suite | I need the assessor in the hospital; | I could manage this procedure independently and do not require direct supervision | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| RATINGS | ||||||||
| Ratings should be judged against the standard laid out in the syllabus for the trainee’s stage of training. | ||||||||
| N=Not observed D=Development required, S=Satisfactory (no prompting or intervention required) O=Outstanding | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| ||||||||
| 1: Describes indications, anatomy, procedure and complications to assessor | ||||||||
| 2: Obtains consent, after explaining procedure and possible complications to patient | ||||||||
| 3: Prepares for procedure according to an agreed protocol | ||||||||
| 4: Demonstrates situational awareness through constant clinical monitoring | ||||||||
| 5: Administers effective analgesia or safe sedation | ||||||||
| 6: Demonstrates good asepsis and safe use of instruments and sharps | ||||||||
| 7: Performs the technical aspects in line with the guidance notes | ||||||||
| 8: Provides reassurance and checks for discomfort, concerns and complications | ||||||||
| 9: Deals with any unexpected event or seeks help when appropriate | ||||||||
| 10: Completes required documentation (written or dictated) | ||||||||
| 11: Communicates clearly with patient and staff throughout the procedure | ||||||||
| 12: Demonstrates professional behaviour throughout the procedure | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Name of Procedure: | ||||||||
| No. times procedure previously done | Emergency/Elective | |||||||
| Performed in a simulated setting: | Description of the simulation: | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| Difficulty of procedure: Easier than usual/Average difficulty/More difficult than usual | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
|
| ||||||||
R-1 – first year PG, R-2 – second year PG, R-3 – third year PG Note: Global summary which is a part of the assessment form is not included in this table
Clinical Evaluation Exercise (CEX) Assessment Form
| Trainee [Post Graduate (PG)student] | Evaluator (Faculty) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name: | Name: | |||||||||
| Assessor’s (Teacher’s) comments | ||||||||||
| What did the trainee do well? | ||||||||||
| Areas for improvement | ||||||||||
| Agreed action | ||||||||||
| Feedback | ||||||||||
| Nil Neutral High | ||||||||||
| Trainee satisfaction with mini-CEX | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Time taken (in minutes) | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| How do you rate this trainee: | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| ||||||||||
| Medical interviewing skills | ||||||||||
| Physical examination skills | ||||||||||
| Humanistic qualities/Professionalism | ||||||||||
| Diagnostic skills and underlying knowledge base | ||||||||||
| Management and follow-up planning | ||||||||||
| Clinical judgement | ||||||||||
| Communication and listening skills | ||||||||||
| Counselling skills | ||||||||||
| Organisation/efficiency/time management skills | ||||||||||
| Overall clinical care | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| Clinical setting: PAE room/Pain and Palliative clinic/OT/ICU | Emergency/Elective | |||||||||
| Performed in a simulated setting Description of the simulation: | ||||||||||
| Summary of the clinical problem: | ||||||||||
| Focus of encounter: | History | Exam | Diagnosis | Management | Explanation | Consent | ||||
| Trainee’s signature: | Assessor’s signature: | |||||||||
R-1 – first year PG, R-2 – second year PG, R-3 – third year PG; PAE: preanaesthesia examination; OT: operation theatre; ICU: intensive care unit Note: Global summary which is a part of the assessment form is not included in this table
Multi-Source Feedback Assessment Form
| Trainee [Post Graduate (PG)student] | Rater (Faculty) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name: | Name: | |||
| R-1/R-2/R-3 | ||||
| Clinical setting: PAE room/Pain and Palliative Clinic/OT/ICU | Emergency/Elective | |||
| How do you rate this trainee in: | Outstanding | Satisfactory | Development required | Not observed by me |
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| 1. History taking and examination skills | ||||
| 2. Relevant knowledge and diagnostic skills | ||||
| 3. Ability to formulate appropriate management plans | ||||
| 4. Procedural (technical) skills | ||||
| 5. Record keeping (timely, accurate, legible) | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| 6. Ability to manage time and work under pressure | ||||
| 7. Decision making and implementation skills | ||||
| 8. Awareness of own limitations (willing to ask for help) | ||||
| 9. Initiative and leadership skills | ||||
| 10. Focus on patient safety (clinical governance) | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| 11. Willingness to ask for feedback and to learn from it | ||||
| 12. Teaching (enthusiasm and effectiveness) | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| 13. Communication with patients and their relatives | ||||
| 14. Communication with colleagues | ||||
| 15. Active involvement with the team | ||||
| 16. Accessibility and reliability | ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
|
| ||||
| Overall, how do you rate this doctor compared to other doctors at the same level with whom you have worked? | ||||
| Please give specific examples relating to any area in which you feel this trainee is outstanding: | Please give specific examples relating to any area in which you feel that this trainee requires development: | |||
| Signature: | Date: | |||
R-1 – first year PG, R-2 – second year PG, R-3 – third year PG, PAE: preanaesthesia examination; OT: operation theatre; ICU: intensive care unit