| Literature DB >> 35308268 |
Xun Sun1,2,3, Weibin You1,2, Yue Wu4, Yang Tao5, Joon Yong Yoon6, Xinyan Zhang7, Xiaoxu Xuan1,2.
Abstract
Hydrodynamic cavitation (HC), as a novel non-thermal processing technology, has recently shown unique effects on the properties of various liquid foods. The extreme conditions of pressure at ~500 bar, local hotspots with ~5,000 K, and oxidation created by HC can help obtain characteristic products with high quality and special taste. Moreover, compared with other emerging non-thermal approaches, the feature of the HC phenomenon and its generation mechanism helps determine that HC is more suitable for industrial-scale processing. This mini-review summarizes the current knowledge of the recent advances in HC-based liquid food processing. The principle of HC is briefly introduced. The effectiveness of HC on the various physical (e.g., particle size, viscosity, temperature, and stability), chemical (nutrition loss), and biological characteristics (microorganism inactivation) of various liquid foods are evaluated. Finally, several recommendations for future research on the HC technique are provided.Entities:
Keywords: hydrodynamic cavitation; microbial inactivation; non-thermal liquid food processing; physicochemical property; sonochemistry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308268 PMCID: PMC8931495 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.843808
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Life cycle of a cavitation bubble (A) (7, 8), conventional non-rotational hydrodynamic cavitation reactor (NRHCRs) (B), and representative advanced rotational HCRs (ARHCRs) (C).
Overview of recent literature on the food processing by hydrodynamic cavitation (HC) (TSS, total soluble solid; SI, sedimentation index; TA, titratable acidity; TPC, total phenolic content; VC, vitamin C; AA, antioxidant activity; DPH, degree of protein hydrolysis; PME, pectin methyl esterase; TPC, total plate count; Y&M, yeast and molds).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Orange juice | Orifice ( | 1.5 | – | H (–) | L (–) | – | – | H (+) | H | L (+) | H (–) | L (+) | H (–) | 1.22 | 1.62 | • The effect of HC on nutrition and enzyme was much lower than that of pasteurization | ( | ||
| Orange juice | Orifice ( | 5 | L (+) | M (–) | L (–) | L | L (–) | L (–) | L (–) | L (–) | • The effect of HC on POD and PME was much lower than that of pasteurization | ( | |||||||
| Sugarcane juice | Orifice ( | 8 | L (–) | M (–) | M (–) | H | L (+) | 3.3 | • The effect of orifice structure, inlet pressure (2.5–3.5 bar), and duration (10–40 min) was studied | ( | |||||||||
| tomato juice | Orifice ( | 1.5 | M (–) | H (+) | H (+) | L (–) | • Lycopene and phenolic contents were not altered after HC treatment | ( | |||||||||||
| Milk (Peanut) | Venturi ( | 1 | L (+) | H (–) | H (–) | – | H (+) | M | H (–) | H (+) | 1.19 | 0.3 | • The optical microscopy results indicate that the fat globule size was significantly reduced by HC at high pressures | ( | |||||
| Milk (raw) | Venturi ( | 1 | L (+) | M (–) | L (+) | L (+) | M | M (–) | H (+) | 0.93 | 0.98 | • The effect of inlet pressure (4–10 psi) and duration (5–15 min) was studied | ( | ||||||
H, high impact (>40%); M, medium impact (20–40%); L, low impact (< 20%), +, positive impact, –, negative impact.