| Literature DB >> 35308071 |
Nibedita Das1, Mst Shahnaj Parvin2, Mahadi Hasan2, Masuma Akter2, Md Sanowar Hossain3, G M Masud Parvez3, Ashish Kumar Sarker3, Md Aziz Abdur Rahman2, Al Mamun2, Md Ekramul Islam2.
Abstract
Among the major constituents of Leea rubra (Family Vitaceae) leaves, phenolic and flavonoind compounds are most important for therapeutic purposes and the plant parts have been used in traditional medicine to treat several diseases for long. Thus, in order to scientifically confirm the traditional uses of the L. rubra leaves, the present study was designed to investigate the efficacy of the isolated flavones against AAPH induced oxidative damage to pUC19 DNA by gel electrophoresis and antineoplastic activity was evaluated on Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) bearing Swiss albino mice by evaluating percentage inhibition of cell growth, morphological changes of EAC cells and hematological parameters of the mice. The isolation was carried out by column chromatography and structure was revealed by 1H-NMR and 13C NMR. The result shows that, the isolated compound was identified as myricetin 4'-methoxy-3-O-α-l-rhamnopyranoside based on previously reported data. The isolated flavone effectively inhibited AAPH-induced oxidative damage to DNA; because it could inhibit the formation of circular and linear forms of the DNA. In anti-proliferative assay, 76% growth inhibition of EAC cells was observed as compare to the control mice (p<0.05) at a dose 100 mg/kg body weight. Thus the isolated flavone showed great importance as a possible therapeutic agent in preventing oxidative damage to DNA and the chronic diseases caused by such DNA damage, and can also become important in cancer chemotherapy.Entities:
Keywords: Antineoplastic activity; Ehrlich ascites carcinoma; Leea rubra; Oxidative DNA damage
Year: 2022 PMID: 35308071 PMCID: PMC8927975 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2022.101244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biochem Biophys Rep ISSN: 2405-5808
Fig. 1Proton NMR spectrum of the compound Sz 04.
Fig. 2Carbon NMR spectrum of the compound Sz 04.
Fig. 3Chemical structure of the compoundSz-04.
Fig. 4(a & b). Protective effect of the isolated compound on DNA damage induced by AAPH. Lane-1: Native DNA, Lane-2: DNA + AAPH, Lane-3: DNA + AAPH +20 μg of compound B, Lane-4: DNA + AAPH+30 μg of compound B, Lane-5: DNA + AAPH+ 40 μg of compound B, Lane-6: DNA + AAPH+40 μg of gallic acid. Each lane contains 10 μg DNA. Here, S-form is the super coiled form of plasmid DNA, C-form is the open circular form of plasmid DNA and L-form is the linear form of plasmid DNA.
Effect of compound on viable Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC) cell growth.
| Treatment Group | Dose mg/kg/day | No of viable EAC cells on day 7 after inoculation (x107 cells/ml) | % of Cell growth inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | _ | 61.14 ± 2.23 | _ |
| Compound | 25 mg/kg | 38.97 ± 4.23* | 37.02 ± 6.92* |
| 50 mg/kg | 22.778 ± 2.89* | 64.53 ± 4.73* | |
| Bleomycin | 3 mg/kg | 13.78 ± 1.58 | 85 ± 5.2 |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5); Analysis of variance followed by LSD and Dunnett’t post hoc test (IBM-SPSS/20) *P<0.05: Significance difference with respect to EAC control.
Fig. 5(a–c) Fluorescence and (d–f) optical microscopic observation of EAC cells for control mice and treated mice. (a) Represents fluorescence microscopic view of control and (b–c) pure compound treated mice cell whereas (d) express the optical microscopic view of control and (e–f) pure compound treated cells. Normal cell with round shape nucleuses appeared in control group indicated by white arrow in (a); whereas the mice treated with pure compound, condensed nucleus and fragmentation of cells (apoptotic characteristics) were found in (b) and (c) indicated by white and in (e) and (f) by red arrow, respectively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)
Effect of pure compound on blood parameters of tumor bearing and normal mice.
| Parameter | Normal | EAC+ | EAC+ | EAC+ | EAC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hgb(g/dl) | 13.89 ± 0.08 | 8.41 ± 0.19* | 10.51 ± 0.37# | 11.66 ± 0.17# | 12.47 ± 0.19# |
| RBC (x109 cells/ml) | 6.15 ± 0.094 | 2.21 ± 0.168* | 3.83 ± 0.165# | 4.35 ± 0.165# | 5.67 ± 0.156# |
| WBC (x109 cells/ml) | 8.176 ± 1.12 | 120.7 ± 1.81* | 64.37 ± 0.92# | 36.81 ± 2.193# | 26.38 ± 1.92# |
Data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5); Analysis of variance followed by LSD and Dunnett’t post hoc test (IBM-SPSS/20); *P<0.05: against normal group and #P<0.05: against EAC control group.