| Literature DB >> 28245624 |
Liancai Zhu1, Jinqiu Chen2, Jun Tan3, Xi Liu4, Bochu Wang5.
Abstract
To clarify the substantial basis of the excellent antioxidant capacity of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. Fourteen flavonoids were isolated and identified from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb, seven of which have notable DPPH radical scavenging activities, i.e., catechin, luteolin, quercetin, quercitrin, hyperoside, rutin, luteolin-7-O-β-glucoside with IC50 values of 5.06, 7.29, 4.36, 7.12, 6.34, 6.36 and 8.12 µM, respectively. The DNA nicking assay showed that five flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb-taxifolin, catechin, hyperoside, quercitrin and rutin-have good protective activity against DNA oxidative damage. Further, we analyzed the bioactivity-structure relationship of these 14 flavonoids by applying quantum theory. According to their O-H bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE), C ring's spin density and stable molecular structure, the relationship between their structures and radical scavenging capacities was evaluated and clarified. We found that among flavonoid aglycones from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb, the O-H BDE of quercetin is lowest with the values of 69.02 and the O-H BDE of apigenin is highest with the values of 79.77. It is interesting that the O-H BDE value of isovitexin (78.55) with glycoside at C-6 position is lower than that of its aglycone (79.77) and vitexin (99.20) with glycoside at C-8 position. Further analysis indicated that the glycosidation of flavonoids at C-6 in the A-ring makes a more uniform distribution of spin density and improves the stability of free radicals leading to the increase in antioxidant capacity. Flavonoids with good antioxidant capacity might contribute to the pharmacological effects of Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb.Entities:
Keywords: Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb; DNA oxidative damage; bioactivity-structure relationship; flavonoids; free radical scavenging activity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28245624 PMCID: PMC6155215 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22030195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chemical structures of flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. 1. catechin, 2. taxifolin, 3. kaempferol, 4. apigenin, 5. luteolin, 6. quercetin, 7. quercitrin, 8. hyperoside, 9. rutin, 10. tiliroside, 11. kaempferol-3-O-glucoside 12. luteolin-7-O-β-glucoside, 13. vitexin, 14. isovitexin.
DPPH scavenging activity of flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb with IC50 1,2 (μM) values.
| Number | Compound | IC50 (μM) |
|---|---|---|
| catechin | 5.06 ± 0.08 | |
| taxifolin | 11.98 ± 0.12 | |
| kaempferol | 16.09 ± 0.10 | |
| apigenin | >200 | |
| luteolin | 7.29 ± 0.09 | |
| quercetin | 4.36 ± 0.10 | |
| quercitrin | 7.12 ± 0.11 | |
| hyperoside | 6.34 ± 0.10 | |
| rutin | 6.36 ± 0.12 | |
| tiliroside | >200 | |
| kaempferol-3- | >200 | |
| luteolin-7- | 8.12 ± 0.14 | |
| vitexin | >200 | |
| isovitexin | 122.83 ± 0.20 | |
| vitamin C | 14.62 ± 0.15 | |
| BHT | 17.67 ± 0.11 |
1 Means of three experiments. 2 Values obtained from regression lines. IC50 is defined as the concentration sufficient to obtain 50% of maximum radical scavenging.
Figure 2Protective effect of flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb against pBR322 DNA cleavage induced by oxidative injury. (A) Agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1: DNA control; lane 2: Model, H2O2, 100 mM; lanes 3, 4: Quercetin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 5, 6: Taxifolin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 7, 8: Kaempferol, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 9, 10: Luteolin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 11, 12: Apigenin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1: DNA control; lane 2: Model, H2O2, 100 mM; lanes 3, 4: Hyperoside, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 5, 6: Quercitrin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 7, 8: rutin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 9, 10: Kaempferol-3-O-glu, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 11, 12: Tiliroside, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; (C) Agarose gel electrophoresis. Lane 1: DNA control; lane 2: Model, H2O2, 100 mM; lanes 3, 4: Luteolin-7-O-glu, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 5, 6: Vitexin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 7, 8: Isovitexin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; lanes 9, 10: catechin, 0.1 mM, 1.0 mM; (D) Analysis results of agarose gel electrophoresis (at the concentration of 1.0 mM).
The calculated O-H bond dissociation enthalpy (BDE) of flavonoids from Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb (Kcal/mol, 1 atm, 298 K).
| Compounds | BDE (Kcal/mol) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-OH | 5-OH | 7-OH | 3′-OH | 4′-OH | |
| Quercetin | 78.95 | 102.70 | 83.37 | 71.86 | 69.02 |
| Taxifolin | 96.05 | 100.78 | 84.62 | 80.17 | 72.64 |
| Catechin | 78.44 | 77.86 | 80.20 | 77.13 | 69.47 |
| Luteolin | - | 102.77 | 83.97 | 80.10 | 72.44 |
| Kaempferol | 78.33 | 102.72 | 83.37 | - | 74.73 |
| Apigenin | - | 97.78 | 83.98 | - | 79.77 |
| Isovitexin | - | 80.68 | 79.70 | - | 78.55 |
| Vitexin | - | 101.61 | 101.52 | - | 99.20 |
| Kaempferol-3- | - | 89.93 | 81.22 | - | 78.69 |
| Luteolin-7- | - | 87.05 | - | 80.45 | 73.30 |
| Tiliroside | - | 77.96 | 79.49 | - | 76.32 |
| Rutin | - | 89.25 | 85.38 | 84.13 | 73.04 |
| Quercitrin | - | 91.22 | 82.36 | 80.10 | 69.89 |
| Hyperoside | - | 92.18 | 84.71 | 75.99 | 71.11 |
Figure 3The 4′-radical spin density sketch map of six flavonoid aglycones. (A) Quercetin; (B) Taxifolin; (C) Catechin (4′-radical); (D) Luteolin; (E) Kaempferol; (F) Apigenin.
The C-ring’s spin density of apigenin, vitexin and isovitexin.
| Compound | 4′-O | 6′-C | 5′-C | 4′-C | 3′-C | 2′-C | 1′-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apigenin | 0.380083 | −0.169869 | 0.303191 | −0.113358 | 0.274517 | −0.163938 | 0.382626 |
| vitexin | 0.373175 | −0.168035 | 0.300523 | −0.108348 | 0.267208 | −0.160770 | 0.382844 |
| isovitexin | 0.396971 | −0.166433 | 0.301826 | −0.112689 | 0.290139 | −0.164036 | 0.383058 |
The C-ring’s spin density of luteolin and luteolin-7-O-glu.
| Compound | 4′-O | 6′-C | 5′-C | 4′-C | 3′-C | 2′-C | 1′-C | 3′-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luteolin | 0.338555 | −0.076213 | 0.184145 | −0.015767 | 0.236716 | −0.135202 | 0.316232 | 0.083901 |
| luteolin-7- | 0.351547 | −0.131706 | 0.247106 | −0.080224 | 0.247929 | −0.146586 | 0.345674 | 0.069776 |
The C-ring’s spin density of kaempferol, kaempferol-3-O-Glu and tiliroside.
| Compound | 4′-O | 6′-C | 5′-C | 4′-C | 3′-C | 2′-C | 1′-C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaempferol | 0.362436 | −0.151734 | 0.263024 | −0.104162 | 0.278057 | −0.152102 | 0.351079 |
| kaempferol-3- | 0.387743 | −0.161792 | 0.289969 | −0.108207 | 0.290449 | −0.162656 | 0.380708 |
| Tiliroside | 0.366781 | −0.159347 | 0.281211 | −0.103501 | 0.274765 | −0.158234 | 0.373993 |
The C-ring’s spin density of quercetin, quercitrin, hyperoside and rutin.
| Compound | 4′-O | 6′-C | 5′-C | 4′-C | 3′-C | 2′-C | 1′-C | 3′-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quercetin | 0.316394 | −0.063693 | 0.165670 | −0.012205 | 0.246853 | −0.131286 | 0.299326 | 0.088008 |
| Quercitrin | 0.334737 | −0.097927 | 0.206668 | −0.093886 | 0.245379 | −0.142259 | 0.308832 | 0.097475 |
| Hyperoside | 0.323551 | −0.060549 | 0.164803 | −0.010714 | 0.254078 | −0.129996 | 0.297435 | 0.090597 |
| Rutin | 0.325680 | −0.070428 | 0.164597 | −0.016466 | 0.251577 | −0.129888 | 0.302433 | 0.090028 |