Literature DB >> 35306619

Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.

Roberto Gammeri1,2, Jacques Léonard1, Michel Toupet3,4, Charlotte Hautefort3,5, Christian van Nechel3,6,7,8, Stéphane Besnard9, Marie-Laure Machado9, Estelle Nakul1, Marion Montava10, Jean-Pierre Lavieille10, Christophe Lopez11.   

Abstract

During navigation, humans mainly rely on egocentric and allocentric spatial strategies, two different frames of reference working together to build a coherent representation of the environment. Spatial memory deficits during navigation have been repeatedly reported in patients with vestibular disorders. However, little is known about how vestibular disorders can change the use of spatial navigation strategies. Here, we used a new reverse T-maze paradigm in virtual reality to explore whether vestibular loss specifically modifies the use of egocentric or allocentric spatial strategies in patients with unilateral (n = 23) and bilateral (n = 23) vestibular loss compared to healthy volunteers (n = 23) matched for age, sex and education level. Results showed that the odds of selecting and using a specific strategy in the T-maze were significantly reduced in both unilateral and bilateral vestibular loss. An exploratory analysis suggests that only right vestibular loss decreased the odds of adopting a spatial strategy, indicating an asymmetry of vestibular functions. When considering patients who used strategies to navigate, we observed that a bilateral vestibular loss reduced the odds to use an allocentric strategy, whereas a unilateral vestibular loss decreased the odds to use an egocentric strategy. Age was significantly associated with an overall lower chance to adopt a navigation strategy and, more specifically, with a decrease in the odds of using an allocentric strategy. We did not observe any sex difference in the ability to select and use a specific navigation strategy. Findings are discussed in light of previous studies on visuo-spatial abilities and studies of vestibulo-hippocampal interactions in peripheral vestibular disorders. We discuss the potential impact of the history of the disease (chronic stage in patients with a bilateral vestibulopathy vs. subacute stage in patients with a unilateral vestibular loss), of hearing impairment and non-specific attentional deficits in patients with vestibular disorders.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allocentric; Egocentric; Labyrinth; Reference frame; Spatial navigation; Spatial strategies; Vestibular system

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35306619     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11069-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   6.682


  90 in total

1.  Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.

Authors:  Nicolas E Andersen; Louisa Dahmani; Kyoko Konishi; Véronique D Bohbot
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 2.  Vestibular system: the many facets of a multimodal sense.

Authors:  Dora E Angelaki; Kathleen E Cullen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 12.449

3.  Human sex differences in solving a virtual navigation problem.

Authors:  Robert S Astur; Andrea J Purton; Melanie J Zaniewski; Jose Cimadevilla; Etan J Markus
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues.

Authors:  Sarah L Bates; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Association between vestibular function and rotational spatial orientation perception in older adults.

Authors:  E Anson; M R Ehrenburg; E M Simonsick; Y Agrawal
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  Evidence that spatial memory deficits following bilateral vestibular deafferentation in rats are probably permanent.

Authors:  Jean Ha Baek; Yiwen Zheng; Cynthia L Darlington; Paul F Smith
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2010-08-22       Impact factor: 2.877

7.  Interference between walking and a cognitive task is increased in patients with bilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Nicolas Bessot; Pierre Denise; Michel Toupet; Christian Van Nechel; Chantal Chavoix
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 2.840

8.  Influence of vestibular input on spatial and nonspatial memory and on hippocampal NMDA receptors.

Authors:  S Besnard; M L Machado; G Vignaux; M Boulouard; A Coquerel; V Bouet; T Freret; P Denise; V Lelong-Boulouard
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.899

9.  Cognitive functions in acute unilateral vestibular loss.

Authors:  Dilara Aktert Ayar; Emre Kumral; Nese Celebisoy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 10.  Anesthesiology and cognitive impairment: a narrative review of current clinical literature.

Authors:  Jillian C Belrose; Ruediger R Noppens
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 2.217

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Recent developments in the understanding of the interactions between the vestibular system, memory, the hippocampus, and the striatum.

Authors:  Paul F Smith
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 4.086

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.