Literature DB >> 27108050

Human sex differences in solving a virtual navigation problem.

Robert S Astur1, Andrea J Purton2, Melanie J Zaniewski2, Jose Cimadevilla2, Etan J Markus2.   

Abstract

The current study examined sex differences in initial and subsequent strategies in solving a navigational problem within a virtual reality environment. We tested 163 undergraduates on a virtual T-maze task that included probe trials designed to assess whether participants were responding using either a place or response strategy. Participants were also tested on a mental rotation task and memory of the details of the virtual room. There were no differences between the sexes in copying or recalling a map of the room or on first trial performance of the T-maze. However, at trial two, males show a significant advantage in solving the task, and approximately 80% of the males adopt a place strategy to solve the T-maze whereas females at that point showed no strategy preference. Across all testing, both males and females preferentially used a place strategy. We discuss how factors such as spatial priming affect strategy preferences and how such factors may differentially affect males and females.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exploration; Gender; Mental rotation; Response learning; Sex differences; Spatial learning; Strategy; T-maze; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108050     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  9 in total

1.  Using a memory systems lens to view the effects of estrogens on cognition: Implications for human health.

Authors:  Donna L Korol; Wei Wang
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2017-12-05

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.

Authors:  Alina Nazareth; Xing Huang; Daniel Voyer; Nora Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

3.  Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.

Authors:  Roberto Gammeri; Jacques Léonard; Michel Toupet; Charlotte Hautefort; Christian van Nechel; Stéphane Besnard; Marie-Laure Machado; Estelle Nakul; Marion Montava; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Christophe Lopez
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 6.682

Review 4.  Promises and challenges of human computational ethology.

Authors:  Dean Mobbs; Toby Wise; Nanthia Suthana; Noah Guzmán; Nikolaus Kriegeskorte; Joel Z Leibo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 18.688

5.  Orientation in Virtual Reality Does Not Fully Measure Up to the Real-World.

Authors:  Kazushige Kimura; James F Reichert; Ashley Olson; Omid Ranjbar Pouya; Xikui Wang; Zahra Moussavi; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Looking behind the score: Skill structure explains sex differences in skilled video game performance.

Authors:  Kyle W Harwell; Walter R Boot; K Anders Ericsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Similar reliability and equivalent performance of female and male mice in the open field and water-maze place navigation task.

Authors:  Ann-Kristina Fritz; Irmgard Amrein; David P Wolfer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.908

8.  Place vs. Response Learning: History, Controversy, and Neurobiology.

Authors:  Jarid Goodman
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Sex and strategy effects on brain activation during a 3D-navigation task.

Authors:  Isabel Noachtar; Ti-Anni Harris; Esmeralda Hidalgo-Lopez; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-03-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.