Literature DB >> 22001012

Eye tracking, strategies, and sex differences in virtual navigation.

Nicolas E Andersen1, Louisa Dahmani, Kyoko Konishi, Véronique D Bohbot.   

Abstract

Reports of sex differences in wayfinding have typically used paradigms sensitive to the female advantage (navigation by landmarks) or sensitive to the male advantage (navigation by cardinal directions, Euclidian coordinates, environmental geometry, and absolute distances). The current virtual navigation paradigm allowed both men and women an equal advantage. We studied sex differences by systematically varying the number of landmarks. Eye tracking was used to quantify sex differences in landmark utilisation as participants solved an eight-arm radial maze task within different virtual environments. To solve the task, participants were required to remember the locations of target objects within environments containing 0, 2, 4, 6, or 8 landmarks. We found that, as the number of landmarks available in the environment increases, the proportion of time men and women spend looking at landmarks and the number of landmarks they use to find their way increases. Eye tracking confirmed that women rely more on landmarks to navigate, although landmark fixations were also associated with an increase in task completion time. Sex differences in navigational behaviour occurred only in environments devoid of landmarks and disappeared in environments containing multiple landmarks. Moreover, women showed sustained landmark-oriented gaze, while men's decreased over time. Finally, we found that men and women use spatial and response strategies to the same extent. Together, these results shed new light on the discrepancy in landmark utilisation between men and women and help explain the differences in navigational behaviour previously reported.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22001012     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  29 in total

1.  Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced attentional deployment in spatial learners.

Authors:  Brandi Lee Drisdelle; Kyoko Konishi; Moussa Diarra; Veronique D Bohbot; Pierre Jolicoeur; Greg L West
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The Body Position Spatial Task, a Test of Whole-Body Spatial Cognition: Comparison Between Adults With and Without Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Jessica Battisto; Katharina V Echt; Steven L Wolf; Paul Weiss; Madeleine E Hackney
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.919

3.  The role of stimulus predictability in the allocation of attentional resources: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Magdalena Król; Magdalena Kilan-Banach; Renata Strzelecka
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-03-31

4.  Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior.

Authors:  Olivier de Condappa; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-24

5.  Motor transfer from map ocular exploration to locomotion during spatial navigation from memory.

Authors:  Alixia Demichelis; Gérard Olivier; Alain Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Visual attention on a respiratory function monitor during simulated neonatal resuscitation: an eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Trixie A Katz; Danielle D Weinberg; Claire E Fishman; Vinay Nadkarni; Patrice Tremoulet; Arjan B Te Pas; Aleksandra Sarcevic; Elizabeth E Foglia
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 7.  Sex differences in hippocampal cognition and neurogenesis.

Authors:  Shunya Yagi; Liisa A M Galea
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 7.853

8.  Virtual navigation strategies from childhood to senescence: evidence for changes across the life span.

Authors:  Veronique D Bohbot; Sam McKenzie; Kyoko Konishi; Celine Fouquet; Vanessa Kurdi; Russel Schachar; Michel Boivin; Philippe Robaey
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  The Feasibility of Using Virtual Reality and Eye Tracking in Research With Older Adults With and Without Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Rebecca Davis
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.750

10.  Sex Differences in Electronic Health Record Navigation Strategies: Secondary Data Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel R Seifer; Karess Mcgrath; Gretchen Scholl; Vishnu Mohan; Jeffrey A Gold
Journal:  JMIR Hum Factors       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.