Literature DB >> 35304701

Time perception in film is modulated by sensory modality and arousal.

Mattis Appelqvist-Dalton1, James P Wilmott2, Mingjian He3, Andrea Megela Simmons2,4.   

Abstract

Considerable research has shown that the perception of time can be distorted subjectively, but little empirical work has examined what factors affect time perception in film, a naturalistic multimodal stimulus. Here, we explore the effect of sensory modality, arousal, and valence on how participants estimate durations in film. Using behavioral ratings combined with pupillometry in a within-participants design, we analyzed responses to and duration estimates of film clips in three experimental conditions: audiovisual (containing music and sound effects), visual (without music and sound effects), and auditory (music and sound effects without a visual scene). Participants viewed clips from little-known nature documentaries, fiction, animation, and experimental films. They were asked to judge clip duration and to report subjective arousal and valence, as their pupil sizes were recorded. Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Results reveal duration estimates varied between experimental conditions. Clip durations were judged to be shorter than actual durations in all three conditions, with visual-only clips perceived as longer (i.e., less distorted in time) than auditory-only and audiovisual clips. High levels of Composite Arousal (an average of self-reported arousal and pupil size changes) were correlated with longer (more accurate) estimates of duration, particularly in the audiovisual modality. This effect may reflect stimulus complexity or greater cognitive engagement. Increased ratings of valence were correlated with longer estimates of duration. The use of naturalistic, complex stimuli such as film can enhance our understanding of the psychology of time perception.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arousal; Film; Music; Pupillometry; Sensory modality; Time perception; Valence

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35304701     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-022-02464-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  37 in total

1.  How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Richard A Block; Peter A Hancock; Dan Zakay
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-04-18

Review 2.  What makes us tick? Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing.

Authors:  Catalin V Buhusi; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 3.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance.

Authors:  Gary Aston-Jones; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  From emotion perception to emotion experience: emotions evoked by pictures and classical music.

Authors:  Thomas Baumgartner; Michaela Esslen; Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Cross-modal interactions in the experience of musical performances: physiological correlates.

Authors:  Catherine Chapados; Daniel J Levitin
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2008-07-07

6.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual rhythm perception improves through auditory but not visual training.

Authors:  Brandon Barakat; Aaron R Seitz; Ladan Shams
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Visual representations of time elicit early responses in human temporal cortex.

Authors:  Maria Bianca Amadeo; Claudio Campus; Monica Gori
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Numerical magnitude affects temporal memories but not time encoding.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Ruiming Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Repeated Measures Correlation.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Bakdash; Laura R Marusich
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.