Literature DB >> 35303150

Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Lin Mu1, Huifang Weng2, Xiaoyun Wang3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) combined with suction curettage in the treatment of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).
METHODS: A retrospective single-center observational study was conducted. A total of 41 patients diagnosed with exogenous CSP were enrolled in this study. All patients received HIFU combined with suction curettage.
RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were administered one session of HIFU ablation. In addition, the other 12 patients received 2 HIFU sessions. Suction curettage was performed in all patients after HIFU, and no patient was converted to laparoscopy or hysterectomy. The mean blood loss during suction curettage was 99 ml. Three patients received two sessions of suction curettage. The success rate of our study was 92.68%. The mean time for serum β-HCG normalization was 23.18 ± 3.13 days. The average menstruation recovery time was 29.38 ± 3.34 days. Based on the blood loss during suction curettage, 41 patients were divided into a bleeding group and a control group. The size of the gestational sac in the bleeding group (3.80 ± 0.87 cm) was larger than that in the control group (3.39 ± 0.77 cm) (P < 0.05). The thickness of the myometrium between the bladder and gestational sac in the bleeding group (2.37 ± 0.89 mm) was less than that in the control group (2.75 ± 0.75 mm) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results suggested that HIFU combined with suction curettage could be considered an effective treatment for exogenous CSP of < 9 weeks. The size of the gestational sac and the thickness of the myometrium between the bladder and gestational sac might be high-risk factors for blood loss during this treatment.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy; High intensity focused ultrasound; High-risk factors; Suction curettage

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35303150     DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06487-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0932-0067            Impact factor:   2.493


  37 in total

1.  Foley Catheter-Assisted Laparoscopic Treatment of Type II Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Chunmei Zhang; Guipeng Liu; Quan Guo; Yang Li; Qing Yang
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Treated via Hysteroscopy-Assisted Laparoscopy.

Authors:  Feng Qi; Ze-Ying Chai; Man-Man Liu; Ling-Zhi Zheng; Ying Zhu; Zheng-Wen Chen; Wei-Guo Lv
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 3.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 4.  Application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Dongmei Liu; Min Yang; Qingqing Wu
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 3.786

Review 5.  Cesarean scar pregnancy: sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings, complications, and treatment.

Authors:  Daniel A Osborn; Todd R Williams; Brian M Craig
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 6.  Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Treatment Options.

Authors:  Sarah Maheux-Lacroix; Fiona Li; Emmanuel Bujold; Erin Nesbitt-Hawes; Rebecca Deans; Jason Abbott
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.

Authors:  Dan-Bo Wang; Ying-Han Chen; Zhi-Fang Zhang; Peng Chen; Kui-Ran Liu; Yan Li; Li Fu
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Laparoscopic repair of post-cesarean section uterine scar defects diagnosed in nonpregnant women.

Authors:  Maria-Laura Marotta; Jacques Donnez; Jean Squifflet; Pascale Jadoul; Natalia Darii; Olivier Donnez
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Treatments of caesarean scar pregnancy and the corresponding results in ten years.

Authors:  J-F Zhai; M Xu; B Zhang; J-W Gao; N Chen
Journal:  Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.507

10.  The effects of methotrexate and uterine arterial embolization in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Zhuoni Xiao; Dan Cheng; Jiao Chen; Jing Yang; Wangming Xu; Qingzhen Xie
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.