Literature DB >> 24289991

Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.

Dan-Bo Wang1, Ying-Han Chen2, Zhi-Fang Zhang2, Peng Chen2, Kui-Ran Liu2, Yan Li2, Li Fu2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the transvaginal approach for exogenous cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) lesion resection, according to our experience.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Twenty-three patients with confirmed exogenous CSEP treated with transvaginal resection of the lesions at the Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. INTERVENTION(S): Lesion resection by the transvaginal approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume, and average days of postoperative hospitalization were compared between the transvaginal procedure group and the transabdominal procedure group. RESULT(S): Significant differences were found. No significant differences were found in the drop of serum hCG level after 48 hours and the postoperative recurrence rate between the two groups. The rate of successful treatment was 96%. CONCLUSION(S): The transvaginal approach for exogenous CSEP lesion resection possesses many advantages. In the hands of a skilled surgeon it can readily address the treatment problems posed by an exogenous CSEP without imposing an increase in surgical risk or technical difficulty.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP); hysteroscopy; transabdominal resection; transvaginal resection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24289991     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Huifang Weng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Comparison Of Three Different Treatment Methods For Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hui Fei; Xuefeng Jiang; Tian Li; Ying Pan; Hongling Guo; Xiaoyu Xu; Shanrong Shu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Successful Pregnancy Outcome Immediately after Methotrexate Treatment for Cesarean Section Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ibrahim A Abdelazim; Mohannad Abu-Faza; Gulmira Zhurabekova; Svetlana Shikanova; Sakiyeva Kanshaiym; Bakyt Karimova; Mukhit Sarsembayev; Tatyana Starchenko
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2019-10-24

4.  Myometrial thickness overlying cesarean scar pregnancy is significantly associated with isthmocele formation in the third month of the postoperative period.

Authors:  Resul Karakuş; Sultan Seren Karakuş; Burak Güler; Gökhan Ünver; Enis Özkaya
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Local Methotrexate Injection Followed by Dilation and Curettage for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Prospective Non-randomized Study.

Authors:  Kai-Liang Tan; Yu-Mei Chen; Wei Zeng; Ying Meng; Li Jiang
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-21

6.  Successful local and systemic medical treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy and a subsequent term pregnancy after treatment: a case series.

Authors:  Reihaneh Pirjani; Leila Bayani; Mahboobeh Shirazi
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2015-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.