Literature DB >> 30572017

Type 2 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Successfully Treated via Hysteroscopy-Assisted Laparoscopy.

Feng Qi1, Ze-Ying Chai2, Man-Man Liu2, Ling-Zhi Zheng2, Ying Zhu2, Zheng-Wen Chen2, Wei-Guo Lv3.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy as a treatment strategy for type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at gestational age >8 weeks.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
SETTING: A tertiary hospital. PATIENTS: Eight women with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at a gestational age >8 weeks.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopic resection and isthmus repair of cesarean scar pregnancy.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: All patients underwent removal of the cesarean scar pregnancy and complete repair of the uterine scar defect. The median operative time was 123.0 minutes (range, 100-168 minutes), median blood loss was 65.0 mL (range, 20-100 mL), and median length of hospital stay was 9.1 days (range, 8-12 days). There were no adverse reactions. The mean time to serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) resolution was 22.9 days (range, 14-30 days), and menstruation resumed after 9 to 15 days with serum β-HCG returning to nondetectable levels. There was no recurrence of cesarean scar pregnancy at long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy-assisted laparoscopy may be an effective treatment for patients with type 2 cesarean scar pregnancy at gestational age >8 weeks.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy; Cesarean section; Complication; Microscopy; Surgical resection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30572017     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of the treatment of high intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage for exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Lin Mu; Huifang Weng; Xiaoyun Wang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy.

Authors:  Jiangdong Xiang; Yannan Cao; Lina Zhou; Haiying Yang; Sufang Wu; Linxia Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Uterine Artery Embolization on Serum β-HCG Levels, Fertility Function and Clinical Efficacy in Patients With Cesarean Uterine Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Wenyang Zhu; Xiaofang Zhang; Chang Liu; Yang Liu; Wei Xu
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-02

4.  The Efficacy and Health Economics of Different Treatments for Type 1 Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Tingting Hong; Zeying Chai; Manman Liu; Lingzhi Zheng; Feng Qi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Comparison of Diagnostic Efficacy among Transvaginal Sonography, Transabdominal Sonography, and 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Cesarean Scar Pregnancy.

Authors:  Ke Wang; Fangbin Jing
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.682

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.