Literature DB >> 35290632

Assessing DNA Damage Responses Using B Lymphocyte Cultures.

Rachel Johnston1, Lynn S White1, Jeffrey J Bednarski2.   

Abstract

Development of B cells requires the programmed generation and repair of double-stranded DNA breaks in antigen receptor genes. Investigation of the cellular responses to these DNA breaks has established important insights into B cell development and, more broadly, has provided fundamental advances into the molecular mechanisms of DNA damage response pathways. Abelson transformed pre-B cell lines and primary pre-B cell cultures are malleable experimental systems with diverse applications for studying DNA damage responses. This chapter describes methods for generating these cellular systems, inducing and quantifying DSBs, and assessing DNA damage programs.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  B cells; DNA damage response; DNA double-stranded breaks; V(D)J recombination

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35290632     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2063-2_5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  30 in total

Review 1.  The RAG proteins and V(D)J recombination: complexes, ends, and transposition.

Authors:  S D Fugmann; A I Lee; P E Shockett; I J Villey; D G Schatz
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 2.  The mechanism and regulation of chromosomal V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Craig H Bassing; Wojciech Swat; Frederick W Alt
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  A small molecule Abl kinase inhibitor induces differentiation of Abelson virus-transformed pre-B cell lines.

Authors:  Stefan A Muljo; Mark S Schlissel
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 25.606

4.  ATM stabilizes DNA double-strand-break complexes during V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Andrea L Bredemeyer; Girdhar G Sharma; Ching-Yu Huang; Beth A Helmink; Laura M Walker; Katrina C Khor; Beth Nuskey; Kathleen E Sullivan; Tej K Pandita; Craig H Bassing; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The ATM protein kinase: regulating the cellular response to genotoxic stress, and more.

Authors:  Yosef Shiloh; Yael Ziv
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  The response to and repair of RAG-mediated DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Beth A Helmink; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 28.527

7.  ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage.

Authors:  Shuhei Matsuoka; Bryan A Ballif; Agata Smogorzewska; E Robert McDonald; Kristen E Hurov; Ji Luo; Corey E Bakalarski; Zhenming Zhao; Nicole Solimini; Yaniv Lerenthal; Yosef Shiloh; Steven P Gygi; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Authors:  Alberto Ciccia; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Mechanisms of programmed DNA lesions and genomic instability in the immune system.

Authors:  Frederick W Alt; Yu Zhang; Fei-Long Meng; Chunguang Guo; Bjoern Schwer
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  DNA double-strand breaks activate a multi-functional genetic program in developing lymphocytes.

Authors:  Andrea L Bredemeyer; Beth A Helmink; Cynthia L Innes; Boris Calderon; Lisa M McGinnis; Grace K Mahowald; Eric J Gapud; Laura M Walker; Jennifer B Collins; Brian K Weaver; Laura Mandik-Nayak; Robert D Schreiber; Paul M Allen; Michael J May; Richard S Paules; Craig H Bassing; Barry P Sleckman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.