Literature DB >> 35290072

Integration of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Electronic Health Record: The Veterans Affairs Experience.

Daphne R Friedman1,2, Vikas Patil3,4, Chunyang Li3,4, Kelli M Rassmussen3,4, Zachary Burningham3,4, Susan Hamilton-Hill5, Michael J Kelley1,2,5, Ahmad S Halwani3,4,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are growing efforts to integrate patient-reported outcome (PRO) data into electronic health records (EHRs) to bring together disparate sources of patient information and improve medical care. PRO measures can be used to assess cancer symptom presence and severity. Integrating PRO tools in EHRs can alert providers to address symptoms, which is an essential component of comprehensive oncology care.
METHODS: We modified a PRO used to measure cancer and end-of-life symptoms, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System to create the Veteran Symptom Assessment System (VSAS). VSAS was implemented as an integrated PRO as part of the Veterans Administration EHR system and was used at hematology-oncology clinics in Veteran Administration (VA) medical centers in the Southeast.
RESULTS: From 2013 to 2014, VSAS was introduced, underwent usability testing and modifications, and was finally implemented in the EHR. Between 2015 and 2019, VSAS was administered 43,883 times in 9,058 patients. Eighty-nine percent of Veterans were male, 11% were female, 52% identified as non-Hispanic White, and 43% identified as African American. Fatigue, shortness of breath with exertion, and pain were most frequently reported initially (68%, 48%, and 45%, respectively) and were most frequently rated as severe (27%, 16%, and 17%, respectively). In patients diagnosed with stage IV cancer, higher symptom burden was significantly associated with shorter overall survival. The majority of Veterans with longitudinal measurements experienced improvement in symptoms, most frequently in severe symptoms.
CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale implementation of a PRO system, integrated in the VA EHR, in ambulatory patients with cancer and blood disorders. The integration of VSAS within the VA EHR is a significant demonstration and a necessary requirement for current and future systemic initiatives in cancer symptom management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35290072      PMCID: PMC8932492          DOI: 10.1200/CCI.21.00086

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform        ISSN: 2473-4276


  31 in total

1.  Symptom incidence, distress, cancer-related distress, and adherence to chemotherapy among African American women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Melissa K Yee; Susan M Sereika; Catherine M Bender; Adam M Brufsky; Mary C Connolly; Margaret Q Rosenzweig
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments.

Authors:  David Hui; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.612

Review 3.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991--2006).

Authors:  Cheryl Nekolaichuk; Sharon Watanabe; Crystal Beaumont
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  The symptom burden of cancer: Evidence for a core set of cancer-related and treatment-related symptoms from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study.

Authors:  Charles S Cleeland; Fengmin Zhao; Victor T Chang; Jeff A Sloan; Ann M O'Mara; Paul B Gilman; Matthias Weiss; Tito R Mendoza; Ju-Whei Lee; Michael J Fisch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Cancer Incidence Among Patients of the U.S. Veterans Affairs Health Care System: 2010 Update.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; Kellie J Sims; Rebecca McNeil; Christina D Williams; George L Jackson; Dawn Provenzale; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ethan Basch; Allison M Deal; Mark G Kris; Howard I Scher; Clifford A Hudis; Paul Sabbatini; Lauren Rogak; Antonia V Bennett; Amylou C Dueck; Thomas M Atkinson; Joanne F Chou; Dorothy Dulko; Laura Sit; Allison Barz; Paul Novotny; Michael Fruscione; Jeff A Sloan; Deborah Schrag
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Changes in symptom intensity among cancer patients receiving outpatient palliative care.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Jung Hye Kwon; David Hui; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Oh, the Places We'll Go: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Sarah G Gensheimer; Albert W Wu; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 9.  National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: Symptom Management in Cancer: Pain, Depression, and Fatigue, July 15-17, 2002.

Authors:  Donald L Patrick; Sandra L Ferketich; Paul S Frame; Jesse J Harris; Carolyn B Hendricks; Bernard Levin; Michael P Link; Craig Lustig; Joseph McLaughlin; L Douglas Ried; Andrew T Turrisi; Jürgen Unützer; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 10.  Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

Authors:  David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.965

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.