Literature DB >> 29968179

Oh, the Places We'll Go: Patient-Reported Outcomes and Electronic Health Records.

Sarah G Gensheimer1,2, Albert W Wu3,4, Claire F Snyder1,2,5.   

Abstract

The growing measurement of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) presents an unprecedented opportunity to improve health care for patients and populations. The integration of PROs into EHRs can promote patient-centered care and advance quality improvement initiatives, research, and population health. Despite these potential benefits, there are few best practices to help organizations achieve integration. To integrate PROs into EHRs, organizations should evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches within three themes: Planning, Selection, and Engagement. Planning considerations for integration include what strategy will be used, how the integrated system will be governed, ethical and legal issues, and how data from multiple EHRs can be pooled across organizations. Selection considerations involve identifying which patient population to target for PRO data collection on the basis of the intended use of the data in the health care system, and then choosing specific outcomes and their measures. Engagement considerations include how, where, and with what frequency patients will respond to PRO measures, how to display PRO data in EHRs, how clinical teams will act upon PRO data, and how to train, support and incent clinical teams and patients to incorporate PRO data into care. There is no most effective model that will work in all contexts. Organizations wishing to integrate PROs and EHRs should assemble the multidisciplinary expertise needed to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the various approaches for their particular context. We specifically recommend that organizations think carefully about stakeholder participation; design their system with data sharing in mind; develop a framework to aid in PRO selection; create guidelines to support PRO interpretation and action for patients and clinicians; and ensure patients have access to their own PRO data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29968179     DOI: 10.1007/s40271-018-0321-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient        ISSN: 1178-1653            Impact factor:   3.883


  10 in total

1.  Adding the patient perspective to comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Albert W Wu; Claire Snyder; Carolyn M Clancy; Donald M Steinwachs
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  PRO-cision Medicine: Personalizing Patient Care Using Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories.

Authors:  Griffin M Weber; Shawn N Murphy; Andrew J McMurry; Douglas Macfadden; Daniel J Nigrin; Susanne Churchill; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  All together now: findings from a PCORI workshop to align patient-reported outcomes in the electronic health record.

Authors:  Roxanne E Jensen; Claire F Snyder; Ethan Basch; Lori Frank; Albert W Wu
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.744

5.  Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Roxanne E Jensen; Jodi B Segal; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Richard A Berzon; Dennis A Revicki; William R Lenderking; Carol M Moinpour; Ethan Basch; Bryce B Reeve; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Albert W Wu; Hadi Kharrazi; L Ebony Boulware; Claire F Snyder
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Incorporating the patient's perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration, February 16, 2001.

Authors:  Catherine Acquadro; Rick Berzon; Dominique Dubois; Nancy Kline Leidy; Patrick Marquis; Dennis Revicki; Margaret Rothman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2003 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  PCORnet: turning a dream into reality.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Kathy L Hudson; Josephine P Briggs; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Launching PCORnet, a national patient-centered clinical research network.

Authors:  Rachael L Fleurence; Lesley H Curtis; Robert M Califf; Richard Platt; Joe V Selby; Jeffrey S Brown
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 4.497

  10 in total
  35 in total

1.  Associations between interim patient-reported outcome measures and functional status at discharge from rehabilitation for non-specific lumbar impairments.

Authors:  Mark W Werneke; Daniel Deutscher; Julie Fritz; Michael A Kallen; Karon F Cook; Deanna Hayes; Jerome E Mioduski; Linda J Woodhouse
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Capturing the patient voice: implementing patient-reported outcomes across the health system.

Authors:  Elizabeth Austin; Cynthia LeRouge; Andrea L Hartzler; Courtney Segal; Danielle C Lavallee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Innovations in research and clinical care using patient-generated health data.

Authors:  Heather S L Jim; Aasha I Hoogland; Naomi C Brownstein; Anna Barata; Adam P Dicker; Hans Knoop; Brian D Gonzalez; Randa Perkins; Dana Rollison; Scott M Gilbert; Ronica Nanda; Anders Berglund; Ross Mitchell; Peter A S Johnstone
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Cancer survivor perspectives on sharing patient-generated health data with central cancer registries.

Authors:  T G Smith; M E Dunn; K Y Levin; S P Tsakraklides; S A Mitchell; L V van de Poll-Franse; K C Ward; C L Wiggins; X C Wu; M Hurlbert; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Preferences for Use and Design of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Authors:  Kelly M Dumais; Nadeeka Dias; Laura Khurana; Sarah Tressel Gary; Brooke Witherspoon; Christopher J Evans; Susan M Dallabrida
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  International Urogynecology Consultation: Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Sara Cichowski; Magdalena Emilia Grzybowska; Gabriela E Halder; Sierra Jansen; Daniela Gold; Montserrat Espuña; Swati Jha; Ahmed Al-Badr; Abdelmageed Abdelrahman; Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 1.932

7.  The impact of electronic health record-integrated patient-generated health data on clinician burnout.

Authors:  Jiancheng Ye
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Implementing the physical activity vital sign in an academic preventive cardiology clinic.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy; Jason Fletcher; Sean Heffron; Adam Szerencsy; Devin Mann; Allison Vorderstrasse
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  A Facile Electronic System for Collection and Analysis of Patient Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Lee; Ravi A Chandra
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-04-17

10.  Electronic health record-integrated approach for collection of patient-reported outcome measures: a retrospective evaluation.

Authors:  Maggie E Horn; Emily K Reinke; Richard C Mather; Jonathan D O'Donnell; Steven Z George
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.