| Literature DB >> 35289088 |
Koichi Egashira1, Daisuke Sueta1, Masafumi Kidoh2, Mai Tomiguchi3, Seitaro Oda2, Hiroki Usuku1,4, Kaori Hidaka3, Lisa Goto-Yamaguchi3, Aiko Sueta3, Takashi Komorita1, Fumi Oike1, Koichiro Fujisue1, Eiichiro Yamamoto1, Shinsuke Hanatani1, Seiji Takashio1, Satoshi Araki1, Kenichi Matsushita1,5, Yutaka Yamamoto3, Toshinori Hirai2, Kenichi Tsujita1.
Abstract
AIMS: Understanding cardiac function after anthracycline administration is very important from the perspective of preventing the onset of heart failure. Although cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography are recognized as the 'gold standard' for detecting cardiotoxicity, they have many shortcomings. We aimed to investigate whether cardiac computed tomography (CCT) could replace these techniques, assessing serial changes in cardiac tissue characteristics as determined by CCT after anthracycline administration. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Anthracycline; Cardiac computed tomography; Cardiooncology; Cardiotoxicity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35289088 PMCID: PMC9065838 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13867
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1Study flowchart. CCT, cardiac computed tomography; UCG, ultrasound cardiography.
Figure 3Serial changes in plasma BNP concentration level, serum hsTnT concentration level, LVEF, GLS, and ECV in anthracycline‐treated patients. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Zero indicates baseline. The numbers in parenthesis indicate the number of late iodine enhancement (LIE) patients. BNP, plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide concentration levels; ECV, extracellular volume fraction; GLS, global longitudinal strain; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction. *P < 0.05 vs. baseline, **P < 0.01 vs. baseline.
Baseline characteristics of enrolled patients
| All patients ( | |
|---|---|
| Age (years) | 62.1 ± 10.3 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 22.7 ± 4.2 |
| BSA (m2) | 1.54 ± 0.13 |
| Breast cancer profile | |
| Cancer stage | |
| 0–I (%) | 6 (40) |
| II–IV (%) | 9 (60) |
| Unknown (%) | 0 (0) |
| Chemotherapy | |
| FEC (%) | 0 (0) |
| EC (%) | 14 (93) |
| AC/FAC (%) | 1 (7) |
| Anthracycline dose | 269.9 ± 14.6 |
| Molecular target therapy | 5 (33) |
| Trastuzumab (%) | 5 (33) |
| Bevacizumab (%) | 0 (0) |
| Pertuzumab (%) | 4 (27) |
| Lapatinib (%) | 0 (0) |
| Radiation therapy (%) | 2 (13) |
| Cardiovascular risk profile | |
| Hypertension (%) | 6 (40) |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 2 (13) |
| Dyslipidaemia (%) | 10 (67) |
| CKD (%) | 1 (7) |
| Prechemotherapy LVEF (%) | 66.6 ± 3.2 |
| Prechemotherapy BNP (pg/mL) | 13.5 ± 7.6 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD, or number (percentage).
AC, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; BMI, body mass index; BNP, plasma B‐type natriuretic peptide concentration level; BSA, body surface area; CKD, chronic kidney disease; EC, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide; FAC, fluorouracil, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide; FEC, fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide; LVEF, left ventricle ejection fraction.
Overlaps possible.
Doxorubicin‐converted dose.
Figure 2Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) imaging. ECV, extracellular volume; GLS, global longitudinal strain as determined by UCG; hsTnT, high‐sensitivity troponin‐T; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction as determined by UCG.