| Literature DB >> 35286324 |
Jedediah M Singer1, Scott Novotney1, Devin Strickland2, Hugh K Haddox3, Nicholas Leiby1, Gabriel J Rocklin4, Cameron M Chow3, Anindya Roy3, Asim K Bera3, Francis C Motta5, Longxing Cao3, Eva-Maria Strauch6, Tamuka M Chidyausiku3, Alex Ford3, Ethan Ho7, Alexander Zaitzeff1, Craig O Mackenzie8, Hamed Eramian9, Frank DiMaio3, Gevorg Grigoryan10, Matthew Vaughn7, Lance J Stewart3, David Baker3, Eric Klavins2.
Abstract
Engineered proteins generally must possess a stable structure in order to achieve their designed function. Stable designs, however, are astronomically rare within the space of all possible amino acid sequences. As a consequence, many designs must be tested computationally and experimentally in order to find stable ones, which is expensive in terms of time and resources. Here we use a high-throughput, low-fidelity assay to experimentally evaluate the stability of approximately 200,000 novel proteins. These include a wide range of sequence perturbations, providing a baseline for future work in the field. We build a neural network model that predicts protein stability given only sequences of amino acids, and compare its performance to the assayed values. We also report another network model that is able to generate the amino acid sequences of novel stable proteins given requested secondary sequences. Finally, we show that the predictive model-despite weaknesses including a noisy data set-can be used to substantially increase the stability of both expert-designed and model-generated proteins.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35286324 PMCID: PMC8920274 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265020
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240