Studies Related to Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Past 10 Years (2011-2020): A Bibliometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms have been a topic of common global interest for the past 20 years, with a steadily increasing number of publications. The purpose of this study was to explore the research themes and the current status of the last 10 years through a bibliometric analysis of the publications in this field. MATERIAL AND METHODS We performed a literature search for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Web of Science Core Collection on November 14, 2021 and performed a bibliometric analysis and visualization of the results of the publications using the R-Bibliometrix package and VOSviewer software. RESULTS From 2011 to 2020, 2381 publications were retrieved, including 2073 articles and 308 reviews. The United States had the highest number of publications and has made a large contribution to the field. Jonathan Golledge is an important researcher with the highest number of publications. Journal of Vascular Surgery is ranked first in terms of the number of publications and local citations. Mortality and outcomes, repair treatment, and risk factors are the 3 main focuses in the field, followed by intraluminal thrombus and molecular expression. CONCLUSIONS Our bibliometric analysis suggests mainstream research is focused on clinical studies related to the surgical approach and its prognosis and on pathological mechanisms and hemodynamic studies related to risk factors for abdominal aortic aneurysms rupture. There are many other opportunities for future research in the clinical joint basis of abdominal aortic aneurysms rupture.

Background

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a permanent irreversible aneurysmal dilatation of the abdominal aorta as a pathological lesion larger than 30 mm or more than a 50% increase in diameter [1]. Most AAAs are asymptomatic and are detected during physical examination or ultrasound screening, and rupture or threatened rupture occurs when patients present with symptoms such as lumbar abdominal pain, with an in-hospital mortality rate of approximately 40% [2], while the mortality rate for out-of-hospital AAA rupture can be as high as 90% [3]. Although the management of AAA has evolved rapidly in recent years, and technological advances have transformed the diagnosis and treatment of this disease [4], AAA rupture remains a significant threat for patients [5]. To reduce the risk of AAA rupture, an increasing number of studies have focused on the rupture of AAA, including clinical correlation studies [6-8] and pathological mechanism studies [9,10] throughout the past few decades, but locating significant and essential papers within the ever-expanding literature can be challenging. Therefore, a citation analysis, known as a bibliometric analysis, can be used to quantitatively evaluate and rate articles or journals in a field based on the number of citations it received, as well as to rank journals by impact.

Bibliometric analysis is an overall analysis of the published literature in a specific research area over a specific time frame [11-13]. Compared with traditional systematic evaluation, bibliometric analysis focuses on the institution, authorship, and social structure of the literature, providing a timely and intuitive method to explore specific areas [14]. Previously, various diseases have been studied using bibliometric indicators [15,16]. Bibliometric analysis allows assessment of the main progress made and future research directions in the field of AAA rupture research in the past. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the research characteristics and development trends of research on AAA rupture in the past 10 years through bibliometric analysis, provide an overview of authors, journals, literature orientation, and global situation of the field, and to highlight the latest research hotspots to provide reference for related studies.

Material and Methods

The literature search was conducted on November 14, 2021 using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC), one of the most widely used sources for bibliometric analysis in various fields [17-19]. WoSCC is the authoritative citation index database that allows searching high-level journals. By scanning the complete citation network [20], we can easily analyze and improve the obtained search results based on its provision of high-quality information resources and analytical tools. To avoid daily update bias, literature data were searched within 1 day. The search string was as follows: TOPIC: (“abdominal aortic aneurysm*” OR AAA) AND TOPIC: (*rupture*). The search yielded 5523 publications in the title, abstract, keywords, and their derivatives. The publication period was 2011–2020, and the article types were limited to articles and reviews (n=2390). There were no language restrictions. In this process, 2 researchers reviewed abstracts of articles and cross-checked them. When disagreements were encountered, a third researcher participated in the discussion and made a decision. Finally, 9 irrelevant articles were excluded. We finally exported the full records of 2381 articles with cited bibliographies from WoSCC for subsequent analysis. The screening flowchart is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The flowchart of data filtering (Microsoft PowerPoint 2019, version 2110).

The journal impact factor (IF) and journal citation reports (JCR) category of each journal were retrieved from JCR™ 2020, the most common reference standard for assessing journal performance in their field. The research areas were derived from analyzing results in WoSCC. GraphPad Prism (version 8.5, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to build present annual global publication and citation trends.

All records were analyzed bibliometrically using the “Bibliometrix” package in R (version 4.1.0) and VOSviewer (version 1.6.16, Leiden University, Netherlands) software. The “Bibliometrix” package automatically transforms and analyzes the selected bibliographic information, including country, author, journal distribution, citations, and author’s indices (h-index, g-index, and m-index). H-index means “high citations”; a researcher’s h-index means that he or she has at most h papers cited at least h times; this index is used to assess the academic contributions and future scientific achievements of a researcher, journal, and country [21]. Local citations (LCS) measures the number of times an author, journal, or paper included in the collection is cited by other authors also included in the collection [22].

A co-occurrence analysis of keywords was performed using VOSviewer (version 1.6.16, Leiden University, Netherlands) software, where network, overlay, and density visualizations present keywords with more than 20 occurrences to identify important terms.

Results

Overall Statistics

A total of 2381 publications (2011–2020) related to ruptured AAA were retrieved in WoS. All the publications had 3188 keywords, total citation frequency totaling 41 868, excluding 31 887 self-citations, and an h-index of 77. Publications came from 526 sources and 55 countries, with English as the main language type (2328/2381, 97.77%). There were 2073 articles (2073/2381, 87.06%) and 308 reviews (308/2381, 12.94%), with a ratio of articles to reviews of 6.73: 1. The number of publications increased from 181 to 277 and annual citations increased from 139 to 7369 in 2011–2020, with an average annual growth rate of 4.8% and 55.45%, respectively (Figure 2).

Figure 2

The annual trend of paper publication. Annual publication and citation count for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. The black line shows citations, bar chart represents the number of review and article in 2011–2021 (“Bibliometrix” R package, version 4.1.0).

Countries and Authors

In terms of countries, the UK, the USA, Germany, Netherlands, and Sweden had 20, 18, 17, 17, and 16 output flow rates, respectively, showing relatively major institutional contributions, while the USA ranks first in terms of number and linkage across units combined. James Cook University, University of Kentucky, University of Cambridge, University of Toronto, and Erasmus University are the major contributing institutions. Of these, James Cook University had a total of 560 publications and presents major contributing affiliations with 9 countries and 9 authors (Figure 3).

Figure 3

Three Field Plot for the top 20 most productive countries, affiliations and authors (“Bibliometrix” R package, version 4.1.0).

We visualized the global contribution of studies related to ruptured AAAs (Figure 4A). Among 55 countries, the USA had the highest number of published articles, with 537 (22.55%), followed by the UK, Netherlands, Germany, and China, with 249 (10.46%), 159 (6.68%), 144 (6.05%), and 142 (5.96%), respectively; these countries accounted for more than half of the published articles.

Figure 4

Distribution of countries/regions contributing to abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture (A) and the top 20 corresponding authors’ country (B). SCP – Single-Country Publications; MCP – Multiple Country Publications (“Bibliometrix” R package, version 4.1.0).

The corresponding author countries were mostly dominated by domestic publications, with the number ranging from 0 to 443, with single-country publications (SCP) ratios up to 82.50%, 75.10%, 72.96%, 68.06%, and 83.10% for the USA, UK, Netherlands, Germany, and China, respectively. China had the highest SCP ratio of publications in the top 5 countries. Among the top 20, only Belgium had more multinational publications than single-country publications (16/13), indicating a low rate of international cooperation in the countries of corresponding authors (Figure 4B).

In terms of the number of publications (Table 1), Jonathan Golledge from Queensland Research Centre and James Cook University was the most prolific author, with 34 articles (1.43%), and Janet T Powell was the next highest, with 32 (1.34%) publications, followed by Martin Bjorck (27, 1.13%), A. Wanhainen (27, 1.13%), and Yu Wang (26, 1.09%). In terms of publication h-index, Janet T. Powell and Michael J. Sweeting were tied for first place, both with 20. In terms of LCS, Michael J Sweeting (253) published the most cited publication out of 2318 publications, followed by Marc L Schermerhorn (202). Michael J Sweeting has been recognized by more scholars in the field of AAA rupture.

Table 1

Top 10 authors with the highest number of published papers.

Author	Number of publications, n (%)	H-index	M-index (first year)	g-index	Local citations
Jonathan Golledge	34 (1.43)	16	1.46 (2011)	28	100
Janet T Powell	32 (1.34)	20	1.82 (2011)	30	154
Martin Bjorck	27 (1.13)	16	1.46 (2011)	27	123
A Wanhainen	27 (1.13)	16	1.46 (2011)	27	126
Yu Wang	26 (1.09)	11	1.10 (2012)	19	16
Marc L Schermerhorn	25 (1.05)	12	1.09 (2011)	25	202
Michael J Sweeting	25 (1.05)	20	1.82 (2011)	30	253
Kevin Mani	24 (1.01)	15	1.36 (2011)	23	58
T Christian Gasser	23 (0.97)	17	1.55 (2011)	23	182
Ron Balm	22 (0.92)	11	1.22 (2013)	21	151

Journals, Fields, and Literature

In the field of ruptured AAAs, there were 2381 publications in 526 journals. The top 10 journals in terms of productivity are listed in Table 2, with the Journal of Vascular Surgery publishing the most articles (258), accounting for 10.84% of all articles, followed by Annals of Vascular Surgery (210, 8.82%), European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (171, 7.18%), Journal of Endovascular Therapy (93, 3.91%), and Vascular (58, 2.44%). In terms of LCS (Table 2), the Journal of Vascular Surgery (15 596), European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (6689), British Journal of Surgery (2892), Circulation (2698), and Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (2147) were represented by the Journal of Vascular Surgery, which ranked first in both publications and local citations. Surgery, cardiovascular systems, and cardiology are the areas represented by these journals.

Table 2

Top 10 journals in terms of number of publications and local citations.

Journal	Count, n (%)	2020 impact factor	Research area	Journal	Local citations	2020 impact factor	Research area
Journal of Vascular Surgery	258 (10.84)	4.268	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	Journal of Vascular Surgery	15596	4.268	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Annals of Vascular Surgery	210 (8.82)	1.466	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery	6689	7.069	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery	171 (7.18)	7.069	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	British Journal of Surgery	2898	6.939	Surgery
Journal of Endovascular Therapy	93 (3.91)	3.487	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	Circulation	2698	26.69	Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Vascular	58 (2.44)	1.285	Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology	2147	8.311	Hematology Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery	55 (2.31)	1.888	Cardiovascular System & Cardiology Surgery	Journal of Endovascular Therapy	2147	3.487	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery	52 (2.18)	1.089	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology	Annals of Vascular Surgery	1991	1.466	Surgery Cardiovascular System & Cardiology
British Journal of Surgery	45 (1.89)	6.939	Surgery	New England Journal of Medicine	1948	91.245	General & Internal Medicine
PLoS One	43 (1.81)	3.24	Science & Technology – Other Topics	Lancet	1604	79.321	General & Internal Medicine
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology	30 (1.26)	2.740	Cardiac & Cardiovascular systems	Annals of Surgery	1230	12.969	Surgery

Publications totaled 67 research areas, with cardiovascular system cardiology (1311, 55.06%) and surgery (1129, 47.42%) being the most represented areas in these journals, followed by engineering (194, 8.15%), radiology nuclear medicine medical imaging (147, 6.17%), and general internal medicine (137, 5.75%) (Table 3).

Table 3

Top 10 research areas.

Research areas	Records (n)	% (of 2381)
Cardiovascular System Cardiology	1311	55.06
Surgery	1129	47.42
Engineering	194	8.15
Radiology Nuclear Medicine Medical Imaging	147	6.17
General Internal Medicine	137	5.75
Science Technology Other Topics	85	3.57
Biophysics	76	3.19
Research Experimental Medicine	74	3.11
Pharmacology Pharmacy	52	2.18
Hematology	48	2.02

The top 20 articles ranked by LCS are shown in Figure 5A. The most cited article is “Endovascular Repair Versus Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Figure 5

The citation analysis of documents. Top 20 local citations (A) and top 20 historical direct citation (B) articles (“Bibliometrix” R package, version 4.1.0).

A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial”, which was published in the Annals of Surgery in 2013. This article had an LCS of 138, 229 global citations (GC), an LCS/GC ratio of 60.26%, and a normalized LCS of 32.36, indicating that it is the most valuable publication in recent years (Figure 5B). This article showed there was no significant difference in mortality and severe complications between endovascular repair and open repair in ruptured AAA [23]. Figure 4B shows the top 20 most relevant historical direct citations in the field of AAA rupture concerning time and cross-referencing. The most valuable article in 2011 was published in Circulation: “Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair” [24].

Popular Research Analysis: Keywords and Hotspots

We extracted keywords that appeared more than 20 times in the title and abstract by use of VOSviewer software, removed keywords related to the main search terms, and merged the consistent keywords. Finally, we analyzed a total of 114 keywords. The keywords in Figure 6A are divided into 5 clusters. Cluster 1 (red) has more keywords appearing in the outcomes (381), endovascular repair (323), management (235), endovascular repair (EVAR) (158), and stent-graft (123). Cluster 2 (green) has more keywords appearing in risk factors (394), growth (156), expression (104) and inflammation (91). Cluster 3 (blue) has more keywords appearing in repair (425), mortality (382), meta-analysis (237), randomized-trial (161) and surveillance (131). Cluster 4 (yellow) has more keywords appearing in intraluminal thrombus (157), model (139), diameter (133), wall stress (131), and prediction (107). Cluster 5 (purple) has more keywords appearing in open repair (197), trial (147), and survival (112). In general, all research areas are focused on 2 directions: the first one is clinical research related to surgical modality and its prognosis, including red, green, and purple clusters; the other one is the pathological mechanism and biomechanical research related to risk factors, including green and yellow clusters. Over time, research has evolved from randomized-trial, repair including endovascular repair in the beginning to the risk factors and mortality of AAA. In the present study, outcomes, women, prediction, and oxidative stress of the AAA rupture are the main points (Figure 6B). Among them, mortality and outcomes, repair treatment, and risk factors are the 3 main focuses in the field of AAA rupture (Figure 6C). This is followed by intraluminal thrombus and molecular expression.

Figure 6

Keyword co-occurrence analysis. (A) Classification of keywords in the AAA rupture field: Cluster 1 (28 items): red; Cluster 2 (27 items): green; Cluster 3 (24 items): blue; Cluster 4 (23 items): yellow; Cluster 5 (12 items): purple. The size of the circle indicates the frequency of occurrence, and the distance of the circle indicates the number of co-occurrences. (B) Average year of publication distribution of keywords; blue indicates more distant keywords, yellow indicates more recent keywords. (C) According to the distribution of keywords with average frequency of occurrence, red indicates the highest frequency of occurrence (VOSviewer, version 1.6.16, Leiden University).

Discussion

This study used VOSviewer and Bibliometrix software to perform and visualize bibliometric analysis of 2381 articles and reviews in the field of ruptured AAAs in the last 10 years, providing in-depth information on the ranking and contribution of countries, institutions, authors, journals, fields, and keywords in the field. In WOS, the first article in this field was published by Soisalon-Soininen [25] in 1999, and the annual number of articles in this field has steadily increased over the last decade, accounting for 55.11% of the total articles searched, with a ratio of articles to reviews of 6.73: 1. In addition, the total citation frequencies were 41 868 and annual citations increased from 139 in 2011 to 7369 in 2020, which indicated a tremendous increase in interest in this field.

Among the global contributions, the USA has the most publications and is the most prolific country in terms of ruptured AAAs, with the Journal of Vascular Surgery and Annals of Vascular Surgery being the best journals publishing on the topic, both published in the USA. In addition, although the publications of the corresponding author countries are mostly domestic, there are still a large number of high-scoring studies that explored this field through global data and national collaborations, especially regarding the collection and development of patient information in clinically relevant studies. For example, researchers from Germany, the USA, Spain, and Sweden compared the outcomes of EVAR in nonagenarians vs non-nonagenarians [26], and researchers from the USA, UK, France, and Western Australia explored 20-year mortality of AAA in 21 regions [27]. This means that ruptured AAAs is a topic of common global interest.

This study found that among the top 10 most productive journals with IF <10, all were low-IF journals. This means that publishing articles in this field in high-quality journals is challenging. In contrast, among the top 20 articles with high LCS, 5 were published in the Journal of Vascular Surgery, indicating that the articles in this journal have some breakthroughs and strengths in the field of AAA rupture.

In this study, the top 5 LCS studies were selected for analysis. Reimerink et al [23] published a multicenter randomized controlled trial in Annals of Surgery with the most LCS of 138 in 2013, which showed that in the treatment of ruptured AAAs, EVAR and OR did not differ significantly in terms of combined 30-day mortality and serious complications. In 2018, Chaikof et al [28] published a systematic review in the Journal of Vascular Surgery in 2018 (n=119), which is the Society for Vascular Surgery’s systematic approach to the assessment, treatment, anesthesia, preoperative and postoperative management, and economic benefits. It is one of the most influential new guidelines. In 2011, Schanzer et al [24] published in Circulation a multicenter observational study exploring risk factors for aneurysm sac (LCS, n=106) enlargement after EVAR, which found a high probability of diameter increase after EVAR for AAAs and several independent predictors, including endoleaks, age ≥80 years, aortic neck diameter ≥28 mm, aortic neck angle >60°, and common iliac artery diameter >20 mm, suggesting future research directions for the clinical application of indicators to detect AAA growth. In 2011, Svensjo et al [29] published an article in Circulation that ranked 4th in the LCS (n=101); the article found lower than expected prevalence in this population by screening older Swedish men aged 65 years, suggesting the need for rescreening in higher age groups and selective screening of smokers. In 2011, Nordon et al [30] published a review in Nature Reviews Cardiology (LCS, n=92), which explored AAA as a local representation of the vasculature systemic disease. The review provided a comprehensive and detailed description of the epidemiology of AAA and the risk factors that influence development and treatment outcomes, as well as suggesting that future epidemiological studies should be combined with molecular biology to establish molecular markers or risk factors for AAA rupture to help make a clinical decision. These 5 papers described AAAs in terms of the full spectrum of diagnosis and treatment, outcomes, epidemiology, and screening: 2 papers in Circulation, the 4th ranked journal in the LCS, and 1 paper in the Journal of Vascular Surgery, the top ranked journal in volume.

Figure 6A–6C shows that the hotspots of research on AAA rupture are mainly focused on surgery and its prognosis and in-depth exploration of risk factors, among which the mortality and outcomes of AAA rupture have been the subject and focus of research. In the last 20 years, the morbidity, treatment, and mortality of patients with AAA have been analyzed in different countries, such as the USA [31], Germany [32], the Netherlands [33], the UK [34], Sweden [35], and New Zealand [36]. Morbidity and mortality are enduring themes that vary with time and risk factors. Our keyword analysis revealed that the hot topics related to AAA prognosis are mainly surgery and its modalities, including OR and EVAR. With the development of minimally invasive treatment, EVAR, a new minimally invasive surgical approach for AAA, has led to global research efforts focused on evaluating the effectiveness of both treatments. The results proved that both open repair (OA) and EVAR were safe and effective in treating AAA [23], and the long-term survival rate of OA was higher than that of RVAR, as shown by long-term follow-up [37], and Zhou et al [13] performed an updated literature measurement analysis. At the same time, our results showed that analysis of risk factors for rupture in terms of blood flow and foundation (intraluminal thrombus, flow, wall stress, inflammation, expression, smooth muscle cells) is also a hot topic of current research. Haller et al [38] found that high intraluminal thrombus (ILT) was associated with a high risk of small aneurysm rupture by retrospectively analyzing ILT indices of different states of AAA and hemodynamic parameters derived from finite element analysis-based methods, while the volume of ILT and its rapid increase over time were also risk factors for AAA rupture [39,40]. Boyd et al [41] found that hemodynamic parameter wall shear stress is more likely to cause rupture of AAA at low levels. This implies that hemodynamic analysis is a hot topic in this study, and hemodynamic studies using computational fluid dynamics [42], finite element analysis [43], and fluid-solid coupling [44] have effectively elucidated the risk factors for AAA rupture, such as WSS, peak pressure, oscillatory shear stress index, and relative residence level [45]. Factors such as hemodynamics accelerate the inflammatory response in AAA, and a large number of high-IF journal articles demonstrate that cellular inflammation plays a central role in the pathophysiology, progression, and outcome of AAA [46,47]. On a fundamental level, the small GTP-binding protein GDP dissociation stimulator [48], transcription factor EB [9], sirtuin 1 [47], and the expression of different molecules can inhibit AAA development and rupture and protect against AAA.

In addition, according to Figure 6B, while clinically relevant studies continue to progress, they are being refined to focus on the heterogeneity of different populations, such as octogenarians [49] and women. Among them, women with AAA rupture have a higher risk of death after EVAR or OR [50]. New research methods like geometric-biomechanical [51] and computational mathematics models [52] are also involved, which can be used to predict AAA rupture, including the assessment of elastic and fluid characteristics, and may provide some value for AAA growth and rupture. In addition, proteins related to oxidative stress such as tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1B, trefoil factor 3, and serum malondialdehyde are potential candidate biomarkers for AAA diagnosis, rupture risk, and prognostic identification [53,54]. These biomarkers and their mechanisms may represent future drug therapeutic targets for AAA.

Based on bibliometric and visual analysis, it is possible to determine the development trends and hot spots in this field. Our analysis has several limitations, similar to other bibliometric analyses [55,56]. First, all of our publications were derived from the WOS database, while other databases, such as PubMed, were not searched, and literature from other databases could not be combined. Second, the keyword analysis in this study was affected by incomplete keyword extraction, and for better visualization of the analysis only keywords with more than 20 occurrences were extracted in this study, which may have ignored the latest research trends due to the high frequency of relevant relationship terms.

Conclusions

Our study shows that the USA, Jonathan Golledge, and Journal of Vascular Surgery have the highest publication volume in the terms of countries, authors, and journals, respectively, with cardiovascular system cardiology being the primary research area. The mainstream of research is focused on clinical studies related to the surgical approach and its prognosis and on pathological mechanisms and hemodynamic studies related to risk factors for AAA rupture. There are many other opportunities for future research in the clinical joint basis of AAA rupture; for example, there have been few studies on pharmacological treatment targets. The application of bibliometric analysis to track the overview of developments in the field of AAA rupture is a contribution to continued in-depth research. We believe that the bibliometric analysis presented in this study can inform subsequent research.