Petroula Nana1, Konstantinos Spanos1, Konstantinos Dakis1, Alexandros Brodis2, George Kouvelos1. 1. Vascular Surgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece. 2. Neurosurgery Department, Larissa University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, 41110 Larissa, Greece.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Variable imaging methods may add important information about abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression. The aim of this study is to assess available literature data regarding the predictive imaging factors of AAA growth. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. A review of the literature was conducted, using PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were defined as AAA growth rate and factors associated to sac expansion. RESULTS: The analysis included 23 studies. All patients (2244; mean age; 69.8 years, males; 85%) underwent imaging with different modalities; the initial evaluation was followed by one or more studies to assess aortic expansion. AAA initial diameter was reported in 13 studies (range 19.9-50.9 mm). Mean follow-up was 34.5 months. AAA diameter at the end was ranging between 20.3 and 55 mm. The initial diameter and intraluminal thrombus were characterized as prognostic factors associated to aneurysm expansion. A negative association between atherosclerosis and AAA expansion was documented. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysm diameter is the most studied factor to be associated with expansion and the main indication for intervention. Appropriate diagnostic modalities may account for different anatomical characteristics and identify aneurysms with rapid growth and higher rupture risk. Future perspectives, including computed mathematical models that will assess wall stress and elasticity and further flow characteristics, may offer valuable alternatives in AAA growth prediction.
BACKGROUND: Variable imaging methods may add important information about abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression. The aim of this study is to assess available literature data regarding the predictive imaging factors of AAA growth. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted using the PRISMA guidelines. A review of the literature was conducted, using PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were defined as AAA growth rate and factors associated to sac expansion. RESULTS: The analysis included 23 studies. All patients (2244; mean age; 69.8 years, males; 85%) underwent imaging with different modalities; the initial evaluation was followed by one or more studies to assess aortic expansion. AAA initial diameter was reported in 13 studies (range 19.9-50.9 mm). Mean follow-up was 34.5 months. AAA diameter at the end was ranging between 20.3 and 55 mm. The initial diameter and intraluminal thrombus were characterized as prognostic factors associated to aneurysm expansion. A negative association between atherosclerosis and AAA expansion was documented. CONCLUSIONS:Aneurysm diameter is the most studied factor to be associated with expansion and the main indication for intervention. Appropriate diagnostic modalities may account for different anatomical characteristics and identify aneurysms with rapid growth and higher rupture risk. Future perspectives, including computed mathematical models that will assess wall stress and elasticity and further flow characteristics, may offer valuable alternatives in AAA growth prediction.
Authors: Elizabeth George; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Ayaz Aghayev; Saurabh Rohatgi; Amir Imanzadeh; Antonios P Antoniadis; Kanako K Kumamaru; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Ruth Dunne; Michael Steigner; Michael Hanley; Edwin C Gravereaux; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2015-12-02
Authors: B Timothy Baxter; Jon Matsumura; John A Curci; Ruth McBride; LuAnn Larson; William Blackwelder; Diana Lam; Marniker Wijesinha; Michael Terrin Journal: JAMA Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Harrie Kurvers; Frank J Veith; Evan C Lipsitz; Takao Ohki; Nicholas J Gargiulo; Neal S Cayne; William D Suggs; Carlos H Timaran; Grace Y Kwon; Soo J Rhee; Christian Santiago Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Elliot L Chaikof; Ronald L Dalman; Mark K Eskandari; Benjamin M Jackson; W Anthony Lee; M Ashraf Mansour; Tara M Mastracci; Matthew Mell; M Hassan Murad; Louis L Nguyen; Gustavo S Oderich; Madhukar S Patel; Marc L Schermerhorn; Benjamin W Starnes Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: X Y Xu; A Borghi; A Nchimi; J Leung; P Gomez; Z Cheng; J O Defraigne; N Sakalihasan Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2009-11-18 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: L Speelman; F A Hellenthal; B Pulinx; E M H Bosboom; M Breeuwer; M R van Sambeek; F N van de Vosse; M J Jacobs; W K W H Wodzig; G W H Schurink Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2010-01-08 Impact factor: 7.069