Literature DB >> 31227411

Assessing trends, morbidity, and mortality in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with 9 years of data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Atlee M Melillo1, Jose L Trani2, John P Gaughan3, Jeffrey P Carpenter2, Joseph V Lombardi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons' National Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database can be used to assess trends and outcomes of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. The purpose of this study is to examine the morbidity and mortality for ruptured endovascular (rEVAR) and ruptured open (rOPEN) aneurysm repair compared with elective endovascular (EVAR) and elective open (OPEN) aneurysm repair.
METHODS: Ruptured and nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were identified from the NSQIP database between 2008 and 2016. Data regarding demographics and comorbidities, 30-day mortality, and postoperative complications were collected for rEVAR, rOPEN, EVAR, and OPEN cases.
RESULTS: There were 43,105 AAAs, 34,177 (79.28%) EVARs, and 8928 (20.71%) OPENs. There were 3806 rAAAs, 1843 (48.42%) rEVARs, and 1963 (51.58%) rOPENs. The incidence of rEVAR repair lagged behind EVAR considerably. Mortality for rOPEN was 575 (29.29%) and 344 (18.66%) for rEVAR. No difference between the ratio of men to women in rOPEN vs rEVAR was noted. There was a significant increase in mortality for women vs men undergoing rEVAR (P = .0362). No difference in mortality existed between women vs men undergoing rOPEN (P = .0639). There was no difference in the percentage of hypotensive cases undergoing rEVAR vs rOPEN (P =.1873). For all rAAAs with hypotension, rOPEN had an increased mortality compared to rEVAR (P = .0004). There were 20 (3.11%) rEVAR and 40 (8.00%) rOPEN cases with lower extremity ischemia. rOPEN conferred a significant increase in lower extremity ischemia (P = .0002). There were 46 (7.15%) rEVAR and 60 (12.00%) rOPEN cases of ischemic colitis. rOPEN had a significant increase in ischemic colitis (P = .0052).
CONCLUSIONS: NSQIP data, over 9 years, demonstrate an increased morbidity and mortality associated with open vs endovascular repair of rAAAs. A great disparity exists between the proportion of rEVAR and rOPEN to EVAR and OPEN. The lagging use of endovascular repair of rAAAs must be further explored.
Copyright © 2019 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular procedures; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31227411     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.04.462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  4 in total

Review 1.  Endovascular and Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Dittmar Böckler; Thomas J Vogl; Reinhart T Grundmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Any Postoperative Surveillance Improves Survival after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Amanda R Phillips; Elizabeth A Andraska; Katherine M Reitz; Lucine Gabriel; Karim M Salem; Natalie D Sridharan; Edith Tzeng; Nathan L Liang
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 3.  Epidemiology of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Brazil from 2008 to 2019 and Comprehensive Review of Nationwide Statistics Across the World.

Authors:  Andressa Cristina Sposato Louzada; Marcelo Fiorelli Alexandrino da Silva; Maria Fernanda Cassino Portugal; Nickolas Stabellini; Antonio Eduardo Zerati; Edson Amaro; Marcelo Passos Teivelis; Nelson Wolosker
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 4.  Studies Related to Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in the Past 10 Years (2011-2020): A Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Biyun Teng; Chaozheng Xie; Yu Zhao; Zhe Wang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-03-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.