Literature DB >> 35284304

Utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in pancreatic cancer patients who failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration.

Meng-Jiang He1, Tian-Yin Chen1, Xin-Yang Liu1, Xiao-Yue Xu1, Ping-Hong Zhou1, Yi-Qun Zhang1.   

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) allows for the analysis of diagnostic tissue specimens from various regions. For pancreatic tumors, especially un-resectable ones, how to obtain pathological confirmation is important for determining sub-sequent treatment. The purpose of this study is to investigate the clinical utility of EUS-FNA in patients who failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration.
Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-FNA due to unsuccessful biopsy in surgical exploration in our center were retrospectively reviewed. All of the patients were diagnosed with resectable disease before surgery but were found to be unresectable during surgery. The positive rate of pathological diagnosis of EUS-FNA was analyzed.
Results: A total of 11 patients were included in this study, among which 8 were males and 3 were females. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 48 to 73 years). The median lesion size was 34 mm (range, 25 to 44 mm). The median number of needle passes was 3 (range, 1 to 3). Two patients underwent biliary stent implantation while 3 patients underwent gastrojejunostomy before EUS-FNA. The technical success rate of EUS-FNA was 100% (11/11); 10 (90.9%, 10/11) samples were positive and 1 was negative (being inadequate). Conclusions: Intraoperative biopsy is the first choice diagnostic modality for unresectable pancreatic neoplasms. However, for patients who fail to obtain a pathological diagnosis in surgical exploration, EUS-FNA is still worth an attempt. 2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA); surgical exploration; unresectable pancreatic cancer

Year:  2022        PMID: 35284304      PMCID: PMC8899435          DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-913

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gland Surg        ISSN: 2227-684X


  20 in total

1.  The impact of prior biliary stenting on the accuracy and complication rate of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jessica M Fisher; Stuart R Gordon; Timothy B Gardner
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.327

2.  Impact of biliary stents on EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic mass lesions.

Authors:  Nathaniel Ranney; Milind Phadnis; Jessica Trevino; Jayapal Ramesh; C Mel Wilcox; Shyam Varadarajulu
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  EUS in patients with surgically altered upper GI anatomy.

Authors:  Jason A Wilson; Brenda Hoffman; Robert H Hawes; Joseph Romagnuolo
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 4.  Pancreatic biopsy.

Authors:  A R Moossa; N Altorki
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Fine-needle biopsy of the pancreas: results of 204 routinely performed biopsies in 190 patients.

Authors:  O Søreide; E Skaarland; O M Pedersen; T B Larssen; B Arnesjø
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Impact of metal and plastic stents on endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology and core histology of head of pancreas masses.

Authors:  Noor L H Bekkali; Manu K Nayar; John S Leeds; Lucy Thornton; Sarah J Johnson; Beate Haugk; Antony Darné; Nadia Howard-Tripp; Richard M Charnley; Paul Bassett; Kofi W Oppong
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 10.093

7.  Biliary plastic stent does not influence the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic head masses performed with core biopsy needles.

Authors:  Filippo Antonini; Lorenzo Fuccio; Sara Giorgini; Carlo Fabbri; Leonardo Frazzoni; Marina Scarpelli; Giampiero Macarri
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2017-04-15       Impact factor: 4.088

Review 8.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Dewitt; Benedict M Devereaux; Glen A Lehman; Stuart Sherman; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 9.  Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Milena Ilic; Irena Ilic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The resectable pancreatic lesion: To FNA or not to FNA? A diagnostic dilemma, FNA cons.

Authors:  Anand V Sahai
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.628

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.