OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the presence of a biliary stent during endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) affects diagnosis and complication rates. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 268 patients with pancreatic head or neck adenocarcinoma who underwent EUS-FNA at our academic medical center between 2000 and 2009. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reports, cytology results, and physicians' notes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients without stents, 87 patients with stents placed more than 1 day before EUS, and 11 patients with stents placed less than 1 day before EUS were identified. In patients without stents, the tissue diagnosis rate via EUS-FNA was 92.4% compared with a rate of 88.5% for those with stents placed more than 1 day before EUS-FNA (P=0.36). However, the patients with stents placed immediately before EUS-FNA were more likely to have indeterminate results from the EUS-FNA than the other patients were (P=0.008). Complication rates were the same among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-EUS stenting of biliary obstruction due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma does not influence the rate of tissue diagnosis if performed more than 1 day before EUS-FNA. Lack of immediate EUS access should not preclude stent placement in appropriate patients with malignant biliary obstruction who will undergo EUS-FNA.
OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to determine whether the presence of a biliary stent during endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) affects diagnosis and complication rates. METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed of 268 patients with pancreatic head or neck adenocarcinoma who underwent EUS-FNA at our academic medical center between 2000 and 2009. Endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography reports, cytology results, and physicians' notes were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients without stents, 87 patients with stents placed more than 1 day before EUS, and 11 patients with stents placed less than 1 day before EUS were identified. In patients without stents, the tissue diagnosis rate via EUS-FNA was 92.4% compared with a rate of 88.5% for those with stents placed more than 1 day before EUS-FNA (P=0.36). However, the patients with stents placed immediately before EUS-FNA were more likely to have indeterminate results from the EUS-FNA than the other patients were (P=0.008). Complication rates were the same among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-EUS stenting of biliary obstruction due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma does not influence the rate of tissue diagnosis if performed more than 1 day before EUS-FNA. Lack of immediate EUS access should not preclude stent placement in appropriate patients with malignant biliary obstruction who will undergo EUS-FNA.
Authors: Ali A Siddiqui; Michael Fein; Thomas E Kowalski; David E Loren; Mohamad A Eloubeidi Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-04-21 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Lawrence Mj Best; Vishal Rawji; Stephen P Pereira; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2017-04-17
Authors: Christian Jenssen; Maria Victoria Alvarez-Sánchez; Bertrand Napoléon; Siegbert Faiss Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Tugrul Purnak; Ihab I El Hajj; Stuart Sherman; Evan L Fogel; Lee McHenry; Glen Lehman; Mark A Gromski; Mohammad Al-Haddad; John DeWitt; James L Watkins; Jeffrey J Easler Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 3.487