| Literature DB >> 35283877 |
Dénes Dudits1, András Cseri1, Katalin Török1, László Sass1, Zoltán Zombori1, Györgyi Ferenc1, Péter Poór2, Péter Borbély3, Zalán Czékus2, Radomira Vankova4, Petre Dobrev4, Judit Szántó5, Zoltán Bagi6, Kornél L Kovács6.
Abstract
Hybrid vigor and polyploidy are genetic events widely utilized to increase the productivity of crops. Given that bioenergy usage needs to be expanded, we investigated triploid hybrid vigor in terms of the biology of biomass-related willow traits and their relevance to the control of biomethane production. To produce triploid hybrid genotypes, we crossed two female diploid Swedish cultivars (Inger, Tordis) with two male autotetraploid willow (Salix viminalis) variants (PP-E7, PP-E15). Field studies at two locations and in two successive years recorded considerable midparent heterosis (MPH%) in early shoot length that ranged between 11.14 and 68.85% and in the growth rate between 34.12 and 97.18%. The three triploid hybrids (THs) developed larger leaves than their parental cultivars, and the MPH% for their CO2 assimilation rate varied between 0.84 and 25.30%. The impact of hybrid vigor on the concentrations of plant hormones in these TH genotypes reflected essentially different hormonal statuses that depended preferentially on maternal parents. Hybrid vigor was evinced by an elevated concentration of jasmonic acid in shoot meristems of all the three THs (MPH:29.73; 67.08; 91.91%). Heterosis in auxin-type hormones, such as indole-3-acetic acid (MPH:207.49%), phenylacetic acid (MPH:223.51%), and salicylic acid (MPH:27.72%) and benzoic acid (MPH:85.75%), was detectable in the shoots of TH21/2 plants. These hormones also accumulated in their maternal Inger plants. Heterosis in cytokinin-type hormones characterized the shoots of TH3/12 and TH17/17 genotypes having Tordis as their maternal parent. Unexpectedly, we detected abscisic acid as a positive factor in the growth of TH17/17 plants with negative MPH percentages in stomatal conductance and a lower CO2 assimilation rate. During anaerobic digestion, wood raw materials from the triploid willow hybrids that provided positive MPH% in biomethane yield (6.38 and 27.87%) showed negative MPH in their acid detergent lignin contents (from -8.01 to -14.36%). Altogether, these insights into controlling factors of above-ground growth parameters of willow genotypes support the utilization of triploid hybrid vigor in willow breeding to expand the cultivation of short rotation energy trees for renewable energy production.Entities:
Keywords: CO2 fixation; Salix; biogas; growth rate; plant hormones; water use
Year: 2022 PMID: 35283877 PMCID: PMC8905242 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.770284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Expression of varying triploid heterosis for key shoot growth parameters of willow in crossing combinations of diploid Swedish cultivars with autotetraploid genotypes under two field sites.
| Geno-types | Year 2020 | Year 2021 | |||||
| Shoot length | Growth rate/day | Stem diameter | Shoot length | Growth rate/day | |||
| May | June | April | May | ||||
|
| 27.50 ± 6.05 | 95.33 ± 17.27 | 18.27 ± 3.73 | 4.94 ± 0.94 | 50.67 ± 10.30 | 82.60 ± 14.14 | 7.98 ± 2.01 |
| 46.53 ± 3.22 | 158.80 ± 16.67 | 30, 34 ± 4.12 | 9.13 ± 1.37 | 71.70 ± 9.46 | 141.59 ± 20.03 | 17.48 ± 4.04 | |
|
| 37.67 ± 1.51 | 109.93 ± 17.17 | 19.53 ± 4.35 | 8.20 ± 0.30 | 45.23 ± 5.10 | 85.11 ± 9.14 | 9.75 ± 1.56 |
|
| 27.50 ± 6.05 | 95.33 ± 17.27 | 18.27 ± 3.73 | 4.94 ± 0.94 | 50.67 ± 10.30 | 82.60 ± 14.14 | 7.98 ± 2.01 |
| 48.93 ± 1.99 | 146.03 ± 7.86 | 26, 24 ± 2.51 | 9.19 ± 0.63 | 56.11 ± 5.35 | 118.31 ± 11.86 | 15.27 ± 1.95 | |
|
| 36.20 ± 3.72 | 107.83 ± 24.51 | 19, 33 ± 5.94 | 7.98 ± 0.96 | 50.30 ± 5.50 | 89.93 ± 11.85 | 9.91 ± 2.18 |
|
| 49.93 ± 3.10 | 154.50 ± 15.49 | 28, 23 ± 4.77 | 8.87 ± 0.97 | 67.31 ± 6.55 | 130.56 ± 13.47 | 15.66 ± 2.48 |
| 52.00 ± 5.65 | 178.33 ± 9.34 | 33, 59 ± 0.70 | 11.07 ± 0.55 | 75.63 ± 8.75 | 146.63 ± 25.02 | 17.04 ± 3.84 | |
|
| 37.67 ± 1.51 | 109.93 ± 17.17 | 19, 53 ± 4.35 | 8.20 ± 0.30 | 45.23 ± 5.10 | 85.11 ± 9.14 | 9.75 ± 1.56 |
The midparent heterosis (MPH%) was calculated as heterosis over the midparent (MP%) = [(F1-MP)/MP × 100], where F1 is the numerical value trait measurement in the hybrid and MP values are the mean values of the parents (P1 + P2)/2. Results are mean ± SD. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s or Dunn’s test). Bold values highlight the MPH% and CPH% information.
FIGURE 1Growth habit and green biomass characteristics show hybrid vigor in triploid hybrids (TH3/12, TH21/2) vis-à-vis two diploid Swedish cultivars (Tordis, Inger) and two autotetraploid parents (PP-E7, PP-E15). Pictures were taken in spring 2021 of plants grown at location II.
FIGURE 2The triploid hybrid energy willow (TH) lines had statistically significant heterosis for leaf weight in relation to the cultivar parents (CPH%) under greenhouse conditions. Statistically, significant increases relative to the TH3/12 and TH17/17 hybrids were detected in the case of tetraploid parents (PP-E7 and PP-E15). Heterosis over the cultivar parent was calculated as (CPH%) = [(F1-CP)/CP × 100]. Results are Means + SD, n = 10. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
FIGURE 3Leaves from triploid hybrids (TH21/2) combine the morphological traits of parental leaves (Inger, PP-E7). Plants were grown in the greenhouse.
Expression of midparent heterosis (MPH%) and cultivar-parent heterosis (CPH%) for leaf functions is genotype-dependent.
| Genotypes | CO2 assimilation rate (μmol CO2 m–2 s–1) | Stomatal conductance (mol H2O m–2 s–1) | Water use efficiency | Sucrose mg/gFW | Starch mg/gFW |
|
| 4.69 ± 1.90c | 0.0357 ± 0.0254ab | 28.67 ± 0.81ns | 9.78 ± 0.97c | 8.83 ± 0.85bc |
| 8.27 ± 2.08a | 0.0683 ± 0.0239ab | 29.32 ± 1.81ns | 9.42 ± 0.59c | 12.19 ± 0.58a | |
|
| 8.51 ± 2.20a | 0.0437 ± 0.0254ab | 27.96 ± 1.57ns | 10.57 ± 0.75c | 11.51 ± 0.73a |
|
| 4.69 ± 1.90a | 0.0357 ± 0.0254ab | 28.67 ± 0.81ns | 9.78 ± 0.97c | 8.83 ± 0.85a |
| 6.58 ± 1.48b | 0.0377 ± 0.0168ab | 27.79ns | 9.96 ± 0.72b | 10.70 ± 0.33abc | |
|
| 8.36 ± 1.45a | 0.0779 ± 0.0336a | 30.51 ± 4.01ns | 9.95 ± 0.39c | 10.54 ± 0.75ab |
|
| 8.44 ± 1.97a | 0.0321 ± 0.0232b | 26.68 ± 2.94ns | 7.91 ± 0.79d | 6.92 ± 0.53c |
| 9.26 ± 1.08a | 0.0543 ± 0.0190ab | 26.83 ± 2.59ns | 11.58 ± 1.77a | 11.77 ± 1.57a | |
|
| 8.51 ± 2.20a | 0.0437 ± 0.0254ab | 27.96 ± 1.57ns | 10.57 ± 0.75c | 11.51 ± 0.73a |
Parental and hybrid willow genotypes were grown in soil in the greenhouse. The MPH% was calculated as heterosis over mid-parent (MP%) = [(F1-MP)/MP × 100], where F1 is the numerical value trait measurement in the hybrid and MP values are the mean values of the parents (P1 + P2)/2. In this table presents heterosis relative to the cultivar parents: (CPH%) = [(F1-CP)/CP × 100]. Results are Means ± SD. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s; Dunn’s test or SNK test). Bold values highlight the MPH% and CPH% information.
Variation of the midparent heterosis (MPH%) in early shoots of willow plants grown in the Knop-solution from the triploid hybrid genotypes compared to their parental plants.
| (A) | |||
|
|
|
| |
| Shoot height (cm) | 4.30 | 5.70 | 10.60 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 173.08 | 298.17 | 137.66 | |
| 4.29 | 7.38 | 3.01 | |
| 623.75 | 817.14 | 968.82 | |
| 81.27 | 130.72 | 170.30 | |
| 5.64 | 6.96 | 4.03 | |
| 2.41 | 7.09 | 3.08 | |
| 7.53 | 12.44 | 6.9 | |
| 41.07 | 46.14 | 33.12 | |
| 2.35 | 11.19 | 9.62 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Shoot height (cm) | 4.30 | 10.30 | 10.70 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 173.08 | 264.23 | 143.21 | |
| 623.75 | 812.07 | 523.30 | |
| 100.99 | 120.12 | 32.44 | |
| 64.36 | 71.39 | 30.11 | |
| 11.73 | 18.28 | 10.96 | |
| 0.00 | 2.70 | 0.00 | |
| 5.64 | 6.16 | 4.55 | |
| 1.12 | 8.82 | 1.82 | |
| 2.15 | 3.89 | 0.00 | |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |
| Shoot height (cm) | 2.70 | 5.90 | 10.60 |
|
| |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| 242.29 | 732.87 | 234.39 | |
| 90.10 | 199.70 | 33.36 | |
| 1939.04 | 1730.20 | 770.38 | |
| 2263.83 | 2971.87 | 935.95 | |
| 180.58 | 206.43 | 137.66 | |
| 200.01 | 232.25 | 203.07 | |
| 47.25 | 88.31 | 77.03 | |
| 29.07 | 26.17 | 19.10 | |
| 8.15 | 6.41 | 3.08 | |
| 6.84 | 8.72 | 6.9 | |
| 14.48 | 12.42 | 9.62 | |
| 13.33 | 18.66 | 14.24 | |
The MPH% was calculated as heterosis over mid-parent (MP%) = [(F1-MP)/MP × 100], where F1 is the numerical value trait measurement in the hybrid and MP values are the mean values of the parents (P1 + P2)/2. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s test). Bold values highlight the MPH% and CPH% information.
Substrate characteristics of wood samples from parental and triploid willow genotypes and their positive and negative midparent heterosis (MPH%) values for cell wall components.
| Genotypes | Wood weight (g/cm) | Acid detergent lignin(%) | Cellulose + | Hemicellulose |
| Tordis | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 15.18 ± 1.06bc | 41.81 ± 2.13a | 18.33 ± 0.39b |
| 0.82 ± 0.07 | 13.89 ± 3.50c | 37.93 ± 3.29ab | 20.32 ± 0.42a | |
| PP-E7 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 15.02 ± 1.09bc | 35.19 ± 0.76b | 16.19 ± 0.54d |
| Tordis | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 15.18 ± 1.06bc | 41.81 ± 2.13a | 18.33 ± 0.39b |
| 0.78 ± 0.05 | 18.09 ± 0.25ab | 35.60 ± 2.01a | 18.10 ± 0.36b | |
| PP-E15 | 0.83 ± 0.01 | 16.12 ± 3.03abc | 34.49 ± 2.25b | 17.13 ± 0.24c |
| Inger | 0.88 ± 0.22 | 19.17 ± 0.24 | 39.53 ± 3.07 | 17.19 ± 0.30c |
| 0.92 ± 0.30 | 14.64 ± 1.64 | 38.68 ± 3.81 | 16.19 ± 0.14d | |
| PP-E7 | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 15.02 ± 1.09bc | 35.19 ± 0.76b | 16.19 ± 0.54d |
Results are mean ± SD. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s test). Bold values highlight the MPH% and CPH% information.
FIGURE 4Genotype-dependent positive or negative triploid hybrid vigor in methane fermentation productivity from woody tissues. Values denoted with different letters show significant differences at p ≤ 0.05 (Duncan’s test).
FIGURE 5Expression of hybrid vigor for biomethane fermentation potential using woody samples from triploid hybrid (TH3/12) plants in comparison with parental plant samples during a complete cycle of the fermentation process.