| Literature DB >> 35281152 |
Ankit Saxena1, Ravleen Nagi2, T Sandeep3, Deepa Jatti Patil4, Ruchika Choudhary5, Aninditya Kaur1.
Abstract
Introduction: Candida is most common fungal pathogen in the immunocompromised and medically ill patients. Higher prevalence of Candida albicans has been reported in tobacco users and oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) patients which may be due to immunosuppression. Recently, emergence of nonalbicans candida (NAC) species resistant to conventional antifungal treatment has been observed that requires accurate identification of organisms at species level for reduction of progression of suspicious oral lesions toward malignancy. Aims andEntities:
Keywords: Candida; Vitek 2; infections; nonalbicans candida
Year: 2022 PMID: 35281152 PMCID: PMC8859613 DOI: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_411_20
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Oral Maxillofac Pathol ISSN: 0973-029X
Figure 1(a) HiCrome differential Color Agar Media (b) Isolated Candida Colonies on Petridish (c) Centrifugation machine
Figure 2Automated Vitek 2 Compact System and YST 2 identification cards
Figure 3Distribution of samples according to age groups in three groups
Figure 4Distribution of samples according to habits in Group I and Group II
Comparison of three groups (I, II, III) with the presence of different species by color method
| Species | Present (%) |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Total | |||
|
| 2 (4.00) | 20 (40.00) | 6 (12.00) | 28 (18.67) | 23.3790 | 0.00001* |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 7 (14.00) | 7 (14.00) | 2 (4.00) | 16 (10.67) | 3.4750 | 0.1760 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 4 (8.00) | 34 (68.00) | 1 (2.00) | 39 (26.00) | 68.7690 | 0.00001* |
|
| 1 (2.00) | 14 (28.00) | 2 (4.00) | 17 (11.33) | 20.6930 | 0.00001* |
| Un identified | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | - | - |
*Statistically significant
Pairwise comparison of three groups with presence of different species by color method
| Species | Group I versus Group II ( | Group I versus Group III ( | Group II versus Group III ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.0019* | 0.4906 | 0.0158* |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 1.0000 | 0.3888 | 0.3888 |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 0.00001* | 0.6051 | 0.00001* |
|
| 0.0251* | 0.8632 | 0.0386 |
| Un identified | 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
*Statistically significant
Comparison of three groups (I, II, III) with the presence of different species by Vitek 2 method
| Species | Present (%) |
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Total | |||
|
| 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (0.67) | 2.0000 | 0.3680 |
|
| 4 (8.00) | 9 (18.00) | 2 (4.00) | 15 (10.00) | 5.7390 | 0.0570 |
|
| 1 (2.00) | 5 (10.00) | 0 (0.00) | 6 (4.00) | 7.2430 | 0.0270* |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (0.67) | 2.0000 | 0.3680 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.00) | 1 (0.67) | 2.0000 | 0.3680 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0 (0.00) | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Un identified | 10 (20.00) | 23 (46.00) | 6 (12.00) | 39 (26.00) | 16.4240 | 0.0002* |
*Statistically significant
Pairwise comparison of three groups with presence of different species by Vitek 2 method
| Species | Group I versus Group II ( | Group I versus Group III ( | Group II versus Group III ( |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.8632 | 1.0000 | 0.8632 |
|
| 0.3888 | 0.7303 | 0.2277 |
|
| 0.4906 | 0.8632 | 0.3888 |
|
| 1.0000 | 0.8632 | 0.8632 |
|
| 1.0000 | 0.8632 | 0.8632 |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
|
| 1.0000 | 1.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Un identified | 0.0250* | 0.4905 | 0.0034* |
*Statistically significant
Comparison of color and Vitek 2 method in the assessment of species in three groups
| Species | Color and Vitek method | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Group I | Group II | Group III | ||||
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Candida albicans | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 3.6322 | 0.0003* | 2.2014 | 0.0277* |
| Candida famata | 1.8257 | 0.0679 | 2.6656 | 0.0077* | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Candida ciferrii | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 2.0226 | 0.0431* | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Candida tropicalis | 2.3664 | 0.0180* | 2.3664 | 0.0180* | 0.5345 | 0.5930 |
| Candida gulleri | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Candida krusei | 1.8257 | 0.0679 | 5.0862 | 0.0001* | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
| Candida glabrata | 0.0000 | 1.0000 | 3.2958 | 0.0010* | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
*Statistically significant