| Literature DB >> 31105044 |
Kevin D Hall1, Alexis Ayuketah2, Robert Brychta2, Hongyi Cai2, Thomas Cassimatis2, Kong Y Chen2, Stephanie T Chung2, Elise Costa2, Amber Courville3, Valerie Darcey2, Laura A Fletcher2, Ciaran G Forde4, Ahmed M Gharib2, Juen Guo2, Rebecca Howard2, Paule V Joseph5, Suzanne McGehee2, Ronald Ouwerkerk2, Klaudia Raisinger3, Irene Rozga2, Michael Stagliano2, Mary Walter2, Peter J Walter2, Shanna Yang3, Megan Zhou2.
Abstract
We investigated whether ultra-processed foods affect energy intake in 20 weight-stable adults, aged (mean ± SE) 31.2 ± 1.6 years and BMI = 27 ± 1.5 kg/m2. Subjects were admitted to the NIH Clinical Center and randomized to receive either ultra-processed or unprocessed diets for 2 weeks immediately followed by the alternate diet for 2 weeks. Meals were designed to be matched for presented calories, energy density, macronutrients, sugar, sodium, and fiber. Subjects were instructed to consume as much or as little as desired. Energy intake was greater during the ultra-processed diet (508 ± 106 kcal/day; p = 0.0001), with increased consumption of carbohydrate (280 ± 54 kcal/day; p < 0.0001) and fat (230 ± 53 kcal/day; p = 0.0004), but not protein (-2 ± 12 kcal/day; p = 0.85). Weight changes were highly correlated with energy intake (r = 0.8, p < 0.0001), with participants gaining 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.009) during the ultra-processed diet and losing 0.9 ± 0.3 kg (p = 0.007) during the unprocessed diet. Limiting consumption of ultra-processed foods may be an effective strategy for obesity prevention and treatment. Published by Elsevier Inc.Entities:
Keywords: diet quality; energy balance; energy intake; processed food; weight gain; weight loss
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31105044 PMCID: PMC7946062 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.05.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Metab ISSN: 1550-4131 Impact factor: 27.287