Literature DB >> 35274156

Evaluation and optimization of PolyJet 3D-printed materials for cell culture studies.

Emily R Currens1, Michael R Armbruster1, Andre D Castiaux1,2, James L Edwards1, R Scott Martin3,4.   

Abstract

Use of 3D printing for microfluidics is a rapidly growing area, with applications involving cell culture in these devices also becoming of interest. 3D printing can be used to create custom-designed devices that have complex features and integrate different material types in one device; however, there are fewer studies studying the ability to culture cells on the various substrates that are available. This work describes the effect of PolyJet 3D-printing technology on cell culture of two cell lines, bovine pulmonary artery endothelial cells (BPAECs) and Madin-Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells, on two different types of printed materials (VeroClear or MED610). It was found that untreated devices, when used for studies of 1 day or more, led to unsuccessful culture. A variety of device treatment methodologies were investigated, with the most success coming from the use of sodium hydroxide/sodium metasilicate solution. Devices treated with this cleaning step resulted in culture of BPAECs and MDCK cells that were more similar to what is obtained in traditional culture flasks (in terms of cell morphology, viability, and cell density). LC-MS/MS analysis (via Orbitrap MS) was used to determine potential leachates from untreated devices. Finally, the use of a fiber scaffold in the devices was utilized to further evaluate the treatment methodology and to also demonstrate the ability to perform 3D culture in such devices. This study will be of use for researchers wanting to utilize these or other cell types in PolyJet-based 3D-printed devices.
© 2022. Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Cell systems; Microfabrication; Microfluidics; Single cell analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35274156      PMCID: PMC9018575          DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-03991-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.478


  34 in total

1.  Effect of decreasing column inner diameter and use of off-line two-dimensional chromatography on metabolite detection in complex mixtures.

Authors:  James L Edwards; Rachel L Edwards; Kendra R Reid; Robert T Kennedy
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 2.  Recent advances in microfluidic technologies for cell-to-cell interaction studies.

Authors:  Mario Rothbauer; Helene Zirath; Peter Ertl
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 6.799

3.  PolyJet 3D-Printed Enclosed Microfluidic Channels without Photocurable Supports.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Cody W Pinger; Elizabeth A Hayter; Marcus E Bunn; R Scott Martin; Dana M Spence
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Review of 3D Cell Culture with Analysis in Microfluidic Systems.

Authors:  Andre D Castiaux; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2019-08-06       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 5.  3D-Printed Microfluidics.

Authors:  Anthony K Au; Wilson Huynh; Lisa F Horowitz; Albert Folch
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 15.336

6.  Optimising the biocompatibility of 3D printed photopolymer constructs in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  C G Y Ngan; C D O'Connell; R Blanchard; M Boyd-Moss; R J Williams; J Bourke; A Quigley; P McKelvie; R M I Kapsa; P F M Choong
Journal:  Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.715

7.  Feasibility and Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Photopolymerized and Laser Sintered Polymers for Neuronal, Myogenic, and Hepatic Cell Types.

Authors:  Rowan P Rimington; Andrew J Capel; Darren J Player; Richard J Bibb; Steven D R Christie; Mark P Lewis
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 4.979

8.  3D-printed Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Advantages and Limitations-a Mini Review.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Akash S Munshi; Alexandra D Townsend; Dana M Spence; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

9.  Use of electrospinning and dynamic air focusing to create three-dimensional cell culture scaffolds in microfluidic devices.

Authors:  Chengpeng Chen; Benjamin T Mehl; Scott A Sell; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 10.  The MDCK variety pack: choosing the right strain.

Authors:  Joseph D Dukes; Paul Whitley; Andrew D Chalmers
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 4.241

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Microfluidics for 3D Cell and Tissue Cultures: Microfabricative and Ethical Aspects Updates.

Authors:  Tania Limongi; Francesco Guzzi; Elvira Parrotta; Patrizio Candeloro; Stefania Scalise; Valeria Lucchino; Francesco Gentile; Luca Tirinato; Maria Laura Coluccio; Bruno Torre; Marco Allione; Monica Marini; Francesca Susa; Enzo Di Fabrizio; Giovanni Cuda; Gerardo Perozziello
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 7.666

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.