Literature DB >> 29900676

Feasibility and Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Photopolymerized and Laser Sintered Polymers for Neuronal, Myogenic, and Hepatic Cell Types.

Rowan P Rimington1, Andrew J Capel1,2, Darren J Player1,3, Richard J Bibb4, Steven D R Christie2, Mark P Lewis1.   

Abstract

The integration of additive manufacturing (AM) technology within biological systems holds significant potential, specifically when refining the methods utilized for the creation of in vitro models. Therefore, examination of cellular interaction with the physical/physicochemical properties of 3D-printed polymers is critically important. In this work, skeletal muscle (C2 C12 ), neuronal (SH-SY5Y) and hepatic (HepG2) cell lines are utilized to ascertain critical evidence of cellular behavior in response to 3D-printed candidate polymers: Clear-FL (stereolithography, SL), PA-12 (laser sintering, LS), and VeroClear (PolyJet). This research outlines initial critical evidence for a framework of polymer/AM process selection when 3D printing biologically receptive scaffolds, derived from industry standard, commercially available AM instrumentation. C2 C12 , SH-SY5Y, and HepG2 cells favor LS polymer PA-12 for applications in which cellular adherence is necessitated. However, cell type specific responses are evident when cultured in the chemical leachate of photopolymers (Clear-FL and VeroClear). With the increasing prevalence of 3D-printed biointerfaces, the development of rigorous cell type specific biocompatibility data is imperative. Supplementing the currently limited database of functional 3D-printed biomaterials affords the opportunity for experiment-specific AM process and polymer selection, dependent on biological application and intricacy of design features required.
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; biocompatibility; hepatocyte; neuronal; skeletal muscle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29900676     DOI: 10.1002/mabi.201800113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Macromol Biosci        ISSN: 1616-5187            Impact factor:   4.979


  9 in total

1.  Microscale impeller pump for recirculating flow in organs-on-chip and microreactors.

Authors:  Sophie R Cook; Hannah B Musgrove; Amy L Throckmorton; Rebecca R Pompano
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 2.  Applied tutorial for the design and fabrication of biomicrofluidic devices by resin 3D printing.

Authors:  Hannah B Musgrove; Megan A Catterton; Rebecca R Pompano
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 6.911

3.  PolyJet-Based 3D Printing against Micromolds to Produce Channel Structures for Microchip Electrophoresis.

Authors:  Major A Selemani; Andre D Castiaux; R Scott Martin
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-04-08

4.  Evaluation and optimization of PolyJet 3D-printed materials for cell culture studies.

Authors:  Emily R Currens; Michael R Armbruster; Andre D Castiaux; James L Edwards; R Scott Martin
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.478

5.  Scalable 3D Printed Molds for Human Tissue Engineered Skeletal Muscle.

Authors:  Andrew J Capel; Rowan P Rimington; Jacob W Fleming; Darren J Player; Luke A Baker; Mark C Turner; Julia M Jones; Neil R W Martin; Richard A Ferguson; Vivek C Mudera; Mark P Lewis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-14

6.  Gaining Micropattern Fidelity in an NOA81 Microsieve Laser Ablation Process.

Authors:  Rahman Sabahi-Kaviani; Regina Luttge
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Micro-respirometry of whole cells and isolated mitochondria.

Authors:  Yan Levitsky; David J Pegouske; Sandra S Hammer; Nathan L Frantz; Kiera P Fisher; Artem B Muchnik; Anand R Saripalli; Philip Kirschner; Jason N Bazil; Julia V Busik; Denis A Proshlyakov
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Biocompatibility of Blank, Post-Processed and Coated 3D Printed Resin Structures with Electrogenic Cells.

Authors:  Cacie Hart; Charles M Didier; Frank Sommerhage; Swaminathan Rajaraman
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-22

9.  Photobiomodulation enhances facial nerve regeneration via activation of PI3K/Akt signaling pathway-mediated antioxidant response.

Authors:  Bohan Li; Xiao Wang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 3.161

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.