Literature DB >> 35273642

Editorial: Epigenetic and Transcriptional Dysregulations in Cancer and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Rais A Ansari1, Ata Abbas2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer; cancer therapies; epigenetics; transcription; transcriptional dysregultaion

Year:  2022        PMID: 35273642      PMCID: PMC8901498          DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.857380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Genet        ISSN: 1664-8021            Impact factor:   4.599


× No keyword cloud information.
Aberrations in epigenetic regulation at various levels, including DNA methylation, chromatin architecture, and regulatory RNAs, are often associated with, and significantly contribute in most carcinogenesis (Jones and Baylin, 2007; Baylin and Jones, 2016). Transcriptional dysregulation is another hallmark of nearly all kinds of cancers (Hanahan, 2022). Gene transcription is a complex process and highly regulated at various stages as well as at the post-transcriptional level (Corbett, 2018; Roeder, 2019). Epigenetic and transcriptional events often influence each other, e.g., DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate gene transcription, and transcriptional processes can modify chromatin architectures (Bonasio et al., 2010; Gibney and Nolan, 2010). Increasing numbers of evidence suggest epigenetic and transcriptional dysregulations play vital roles in carcinogenesis, including metastasis, aggressiveness, and recurrence of malignancies (Bradner et al., 2017; Hanahan, 2022). An in-depth understanding of both epigenetic and transcriptional processes and alterations in their regulations are needed to better understand tumor pathobiology and to improve clinical management (Figure 1). Epigenetic and transcriptional dysregulations also confer therapeutic vulnerabilities and remarkably, offer novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets (Gonda and Ramsay, 2015; Cheng et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020; Vervoort et al., 2021).
FIGURE 1

Alteration of epigenetic and transcriptional processes often contribute in carcinogenic events. These alterations can also serve as novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers (created with BioRender.com).

Alteration of epigenetic and transcriptional processes often contribute in carcinogenic events. These alterations can also serve as novel therapeutic targets and biomarkers (created with BioRender.com). Genome-wide transcriptional control is often dysregulated in cancer. In this research topic, Parrello et al. discussed the possibility of targeting factors that control global transcriptional regulation. Li et al. discussed the dual roles of CBX7, a component of polycomb repressive complex, in cancer where it can either help in cancer progression by downregulating tumor suppressor genes or help cancer suppression by modulating cell cycle related proteins. CBX7 interacts with various regulatory RNAs, including micro RNAs, long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs. Regulatory RNAs play a significant role in carcinogenesis, including chemo-resistance (Lan et al., Gareev et al., and Zhang et al.). Sun et al. showed that plasma-derived exosomal micro RNA, miR-2276-5p in glioma patients could serve as a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker. Transcriptomics based gene signatures are emerging as promising biomarkers in cancer (Jin et al. and Fang et al.). Epigenetic landscape is altered in cancer cells that results in transcriptional dysregulation. Various dietary components have ability to modulate epigenetic aberration (Fatima et al. and Raina et al.). Abbas et al. reported that maternal diet rich in omega-3 fatty acid can reprogram epigenetic and transcriptomic landscapes in F1 generation mice and provide resistance to breast cancer development. Pu et al. reported that methylation profiles of zinc finger genes, specially ESR1 and ZNF132, could be potential biomarkers for the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer patients carrying KRAS mutations. Another study by Gua et al. showed that APOA1 gene is downregulated by DNA methylation in hepatocellular carcinoma that could be a potential biomarker to predict survival. Role of NTPCR in epithelial ovarian cancer (Shang et al.) and FGFR1–GLI1 axis as a potential therapeutic target in breast cancer (Riaz et al.) were also reported. Gazova et al. used CRISPR-Cas9 to generate homozygous inactivating mutation in USP16 gene using leukemia cell line and studied how these cells adapt to the extreme selection pressure through compensatory pathways. Authors also cautioned targeting USP16 in leukemia as cancer could develop resistant to USP16 inhibitors. A timely review by Amir et al. discussed the usefulness of combination therapy of tyrosine kinase inhibitors with epigenetic drugs in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leszczynska et al. reviewed the emerging therapeutic approaches against pediatric high-grade gliomas, particularly those having mutations in genes coding for histone 3 variants that result in substitution of lysine at 27 to methionine. In conclusion, epigenetic aberration and transcriptional homeostasis disruptions are associated with cancer. In-depth understanding of these processes and their interdependencies is needed to better understand carcinogenesis and to develop novel and effective therapeutic approaches.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetics and gene expression.

Authors:  E R Gibney; C M Nolan
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer.

Authors:  James E Bradner; Denes Hnisz; Richard A Young
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression and human disease.

Authors:  Anita H Corbett
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 4.  Targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer therapy: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials.

Authors:  Yuan Cheng; Cai He; Manni Wang; Xuelei Ma; Fei Mo; Shengyong Yang; Junhong Han; Xiawei Wei
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2019-12-17

Review 5.  The epigenomics of cancer.

Authors:  Peter A Jones; Stephen B Baylin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Hallmarks of Cancer: New Dimensions.

Authors:  Douglas Hanahan
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 7.  Epigenetic Determinants of Cancer.

Authors:  Stephen B Baylin; Peter A Jones
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 8.  Directly targeting transcriptional dysregulation in cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Gonda; Robert G Ramsay
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 9.  50+ years of eukaryotic transcription: an expanding universe of factors and mechanisms.

Authors:  Robert G Roeder
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 10.  Molecular signals of epigenetic states.

Authors:  Roberto Bonasio; Shengjiang Tu; Danny Reinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.