| Literature DB >> 35270122 |
Giuseppe Fenu1, Lorenzo Lazzaro2, Lorenzo Lastrucci3, Daniele Viciani2.
Abstract
Narrow endemic plants constitute a pivotal group for conservation, being often reduced to a small contingent of individuals and frequently threatened. However, effective conservation actions require reliable basic information about distribution range, ecological requirements, and population traits. Nevertheless, such knowledge results are incomplete or even completely missing for some neglected or recently described plants, such as Cirsium alpis-lunae, a thistle exclusive to the N-Apennines (Italy). To fill this gap, all sites where C. alpis-lunae grow were monitored, and data on the site and population traits were collected. Our results indicated that this plant is restricted to 16 scattered sites, varied in surface area and number of individuals. Reproductive and juvenile plants showed to be affected by roughly the same variables, in particular the surface of the site, the slope aspect, and the canopy cover. The narrow ecological niche of C. alpis-lunae was mainly determined by the canopy cover, and where coverage increases, the number of individuals decreases. The individuals only grow at forest edges, where the peculiar ecological conditions are limiting factors for the development of forestry cover; some other factors (i.e., high inclination and instability of the substrate) contribute to limiting the development of forestry vegetation and guarantee the persistence of these ecotones. Despite the great difficulties in accessing the sites where this species grows, this study presents, for the first time, a complete picture of the C. alpis-lunae population and yielded important data to identify effective conservation measures.Entities:
Keywords: Cirsium; edge specialist plant; mountain plant; narrow endemic plant; neglected plant; plant conservation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35270122 PMCID: PMC8912507 DOI: 10.3390/plants11050653
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Distribution and size of the 16 localities where Cirsium alpis-lunae was found. The numbers reported on the map (red font) and the graphs (at the bottom left) indicate the different localities where Cirsium alpis-lunae grows and coincide with the numbers indicated in Table 1 (see this table for ecological and populational details of each locality).
Main features of sampling sites of Cirsium alpis-lunae populations recorded on the field and used in the analyses.
| No. | Locality | Altitude (m a.s.l.) | Slope (%) | Aspect | Estimated Area (m2) | Total n. of Plants | N. of Mature Plants | Recruitment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seccaroni 1 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1118 | 100 | N-NE | 20 | 10 | 1 | absent |
| 2 | Seccaroni 2 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1132 | >100 | N | 1000 | 187 | 72 | present |
| 3 | Seccaroni 3 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1180 | >100 | N | 875 | 131 | 53 | present |
| 4 | Bucine 1 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1190 | 100 | NE | 36 | 5 | 2 | absent |
| 5 | Bucine 2 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1170 | 100 | NE | 60 | 5 | 0 | absent |
| 6 | Bucine 3 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1120 | 100 | NE | 40 | 9 | 2 | absent |
| 7 | Cucco (Alpe della Luna), Sansepolcro, Arezzo | 1270 | 100 | SE | 100 | 34 | 13 | present |
| 8 | Monte Nero 1 (Monte Nero-Poggio Bastione), Verghereto, Forlì-Cesena | 1149 | 75 | NE | 175 | 42 | 11 | present |
| 9 | Monte Nero 2 (Monte Nero-Poggio Bastione), Verghereto, Forlì-Cesena | 1154 | >100 | NE | 160 | 45 | 19 | present |
| 10 | Monte Nero 3 (Monte Nero-Poggio Bastione), Verghereto, Forlì-Cesena | 1148 | 100 | NE | 150 | 43 | 15 | present |
| 11 | Poggio Bastione 1 (Monte Nero-Poggio Bastione), Verghereto, Forlì-Cesena | 1150 | >100 | N | 120 | 51 | 11 | present |
| 12 | Ripa Luna 1 (Alpe della Luna), Sansepolcro, Arezzo | 1125 | 85 | N | 100 | 107 | 47 | present |
| 13 | Ripa Luna 2 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1145 | 50 | NE | 50 | 39 | 18 | present |
| 14 | Ripa Luna 3 (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1150 | 85 | NNW | 450 | 151 | 84 | present |
| 15 | Poggio Bastione 2 (Monte Nero-Poggio Bastione), Pieve S. Stefano, Arezzo | 1125 | 90 | NE | 500 | 117 | 12 | present |
| 16 | Ripa Bianca (Alpe della Luna), Badia Tedalda, Arezzo | 1270 | 40 | N | 1800 | 138 | 70 | present |
Figure 2Relationship among mature and juvenile individuals of Cirsium alpis-lunae. (A) Relationship among a number of juvenile and mature individuals. Regression line parametrised in log–log spaces and back-transformed to linear scale to plot the actual numbers of the populations. (B) Relationship among the density of juvenile and mature individuals. Circles represent actual number and density values (in A and B, respectively) of Cirsium alpis-lunae mature and juvenile individuals.
The multimodelling on GLM on the factor affecting mature and juvenile individuals abundance and density, and on Cirsium alpis-lunae cover at the subplot level. Averaged coefficients are provided only for factors included in the set of best models (see supplementary materials for full model selection tables). A (+) marks the log-transformed variables in the following analyses, while a £ marks those transformed with an arcsin transformation. Significance codes: p < 0.001 = ***; p < 0.01 = **; p < 0.05 = *.
| Response | Variable | Factor Relative | Averaged Coefficient | Adjusted SE | z Value | Pr (>|z|) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abundance of juvenile individuals * | (Intercept) | - | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.358 | |
| Estimated area + | 1 | 0.49 | 0.09 | 5.66 | <0.001 | *** | |
| Eastness | 0.14 | −0.06 | 0.21 | 0.31 | 0.758 | ||
| Northness | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.818 | ||
| Abundance of mature individuals * | (Intercept) | - | 0.29 | 0.95 | 0.30 | 0.763 | |
| Estimated area + | 1 | 0.49 | 0.16 | 3.03 | 0.002 | ** | |
| Eastness | 0.28 | −0.21 | 0.42 | 0.50 | 0.618 | ||
| Density of juvenile individuals | (Intercept) | - | 0.24 | 0.07 | 3.52 | <0.001 | *** |
| Eastness | 0.15 | −0.02 | 0.07 | 0.28 | 0.783 | ||
| Northness | 0.11 | 0.01 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.844 | ||
| Density of mature individuals | (Intercept) | - | 0.14 | 0.09 | 1.64 | 0.101 | |
| Northness | 0.13 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 0.822 | ||
| Cover Cirsium £ | (Intercept) | - | 0.76 | 0.21 | 3.52 | <0.001 | *** |
| Canopy cover £ | 1 | −0.41 | 0.08 | 5.03 | <0.001 | *** | |
| Ground cover £ | 0.19 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.706 | ||
| Shrubs cover £ | 0.1 | −0.02 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.797 |
Figure 3Relationship among number mature and juvenile individuals of Cirsium alpis-lunae and the estimated area occupied by the population. Regression lines and relative confidence intervals are calculated with the averaged coefficient following the multimodel inference in log–log spaces and back-transformed to linear scale to plot the actual numbers of the populations. Circles and solid lines = juvenile individuals; Tringles and dashed lines = mature individuals. Concerning the effect of the cover of the different vegetation layers on the cover of C. alpis-lunae at the subplot level, while all three factors were included in the best models, only canopy cover showed significant importance, thus resulting in the only factor actually affecting C. alpis-lunae (Table 2, see Table S5 for model selection table). Indeed, canopy cover negatively affected the cover of C. alpis-lunae at the subplot level (Figure 4).