Literature DB >> 21659233

Natural selection on floral traits of Lobelia (Lobeliaceae): spatial and temporal variation.

Christina M Caruso1, S Brook Peterson, Caroline E Ridley.   

Abstract

The strength and direction of natural selection on floral traits can vary spatially and temporally because of variation in the biotic and abiotic environment. High spatial variation in selection should lead to differentiation of floral traits among populations. In contrast, high temporal variation in selection should retard the evolution of population-specific floral phenotypes. To determine the relative importance of spatial vs. temporal variation in natural selection, we measured phenotypic selection on seven floral traits of the wildflowers Lobelia cardinalis and L. siphilitica in 1999 and 2000. Lobelia cardinalis experienced significant temporal variation in selection, whereas L. siphilitica experienced spatial variation in selection on the same traits. This variation in selection on floral traits was associated with spatial and temporal differences in the soil microenvironment. Although few studies of natural selection include spatial or temporal replicates, our results suggest that such replication is critical for understanding the distribution of phenotypes in nature.

Entities:  

Year:  2003        PMID: 21659233     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.90.9.1333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  11 in total

1.  Cyclone tolerance in new world arecaceae: biogeographic variation and abiotic natural selection.

Authors:  M Patrick Griffith; Larry R Noblick; John L Dowe; Chad E Husby; Michael A Calonje
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Does human-induced habitat transformation modify pollinator-mediated selection? A case study in Viola portalesia (Violaceae).

Authors:  Maureen Murúa; Claudia Espinoza; Ramiro Bustamante; Víctor H Marín; Rodrigo Medel
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-03-06       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Florivore impacts on plant reproductive success and pollinator mortality in an obligate pollination mutualism.

Authors:  David M Althoff; Wei Xiao; Sarah Sumoski; Kari A Segraves
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Lack of strong selection pressures maintains wide variation in floral traits in a food-deceptive orchid.

Authors:  Hans Jacquemyn; Rein Brys
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Phenotypic selection on floral traits in an urban landscape.

Authors:  Rebecca E Irwin; Paige S Warren; Lynn S Adler
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  When field experiments yield unexpected results: lessons learned from measuring selection in White Sands lizards.

Authors:  Kayla M Hardwick; Luke J Harmon; Scott D Hardwick; Erica Bree Rosenblum
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Local shifts in floral biotic interactions in habitat edges and their effect on quantity and quality of plant offspring.

Authors:  Domenico Gargano; Giuseppe Fenu; Liliana Bernardo
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.276

8.  Filtering effect of temporal niche fluctuation and amplitude of environmental variations on the trait-related flowering patterns: lesson from sub-Mediterranean grasslands.

Authors:  Andrea Catorci; Karina Piermarteri; Károly Penksza; Judit Házi; Federico Maria Tardella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Secondary reproduction in the herbaceous monocarp Lobelia inflata: time-constrained primary reproduction does not result in increased deferral of reproductive effort.

Authors:  Patrick William Hughes; Andrew M Simons
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.964

10.  Fluctuating selection across years and phenotypic variation in food-deceptive orchids.

Authors:  Giovanni Scopece; Nicolas Juillet; Christian Lexer; Salvatore Cozzolino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.