| Literature DB >> 35269972 |
Kaouther Baira1, Ali Ounissi1,2, Hafida Merouani1, Manawwer Alam3, Nadia Ouddai1, Alessandro Erto4, Krishna Kumar Yadav5, Saiful Islam6, Ji-Kwang Cheon7, Byong-Hun Jeon7, Yacine Benguerba2.
Abstract
Density functional theory (DFT), time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), and extended transition state natural orbitals for chemical valence (ETS-NOCV) have all been used to investigate the physicochemical and biological properties of curcumin and three complexes, i.e., Cur-M (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg). Based on DFT calculations, the enolic form (Cur-Enol) is more stable than the anti-diketone form (Cur-Anti diketone) favored for complexation. This enolic form stability was explained by the presence of three intramolecular hydrogen bonds according to the QTAIM analysis. Furthermore, the ETS-NOCV technique revealed that the enolic form had more significant antioxidant activity compared with the anti-diketone form. The calculations from the COnductor-like Screening MOdel for Realistic Solvents (COSMO-RS) showed that the dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) solvent could dissolve all the curcumin tautomers Cur-Enol, Cur-Anti-diketone and Cur-Cu, Cur-Mg, and Cur-Ni complexes in contrast to benzene, acetone, octanol, ethanol, methanol, and water. Furthermore, except for Cur-Mg, which had a relatively low solubility (14 g/L), all complexes were insoluble in water. Cur-Anti-diketone was considerably more soluble than Cur-Enol in the examined solvents.Entities:
Keywords: COSMO-RS; ETS-NOCV; QTAIM; TDDFT; curcumin; metal complex
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35269972 PMCID: PMC8910981 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052832
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Optimized structure of Cur-Enol and Cur-Anti diketone at the B3LYP/6-311 G (2d, 2p) level of theory. (α, β, and γ are the active sites of both forms of curcumin).
Values of ETS-NOCV, BDE, IP, and EA in (Kcal/mol) of Cur-Enol and Cur-Anti-diketone in DMSO.
| Position | ETS-NOCV | BDE | IP | ΔEexcit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Enol | β | 254.08 | 136.12 | 125.10 | 123.13 |
| γ | 253.66 | 135.73 | |||
| α | 285.79 | 161.85 | |||
| Cur-Anti diketone | β | 256.18 | 136.80 | 131.64 | 132.99 |
| γ | 256.30 | 136.84 |
Figure 2Absorption and emission spectra of the curcumin enol form (Cur-enol). (ε is the absorption intensity).
Comparison of the maximum absorption/emission, f, and ∆λ of curcumin in some solutions. Experimental data counterparts are reported between brackets [34].
| Cur-Enol | Absorbance (nm) | Emission (nm) | Stokes’s Shift | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| f |
| f | ∆λ | |
| DMSO | 454.18 (434) | 1.7086 | 529.05 (518) | 2.0297 | 75 (84) |
| Water | 451.67 (414) | 1.6829 | 530.19 (537) | 2.0338 | 78 (123) |
| Methanol | 451.08 (422) | 1.6819 | 527.73 (534) | 2.0250 | 77 (112) |
| Ethanol | 451.96 (422) | 1.6925 | 526.36 (526) | 2.0199 | 74 (104) |
| THF | 451.24 (422) | 1.7066 | 514.11 (477) | 1.9723 | 63 (55) |
| Acetonitrile | 451.68 (418) | 1.6869 | 528.10 (507) | 2.0264 | 76 (89) |
| Cyclohexane | 445.46 (408) | 1.7128 | 478.81 (437) | 1.8010 | 34 (29) |
Figure 3The studied structures of the Cur-M complexes (where M = Ni, Cu, and Mg) optimized at the PW91/TZP level of theory.
Angles (°), Dihedral angle (°), and bond lengths (Å) for the studied complexes curcumin-Metal (Cur-M) where (M = Ni, Mg, and Cu), and length of the bonds C(4)–C(5) and C(4)–C(9) (Å), for curcumin and its complexes calculated at the PW91/TZP level.
| Pseudo-Tetrahedral | Pseudo-Square | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Ni | Cur-Mg | Cur-Cu | Cur-Enol | Cur-Anti Diketone | |
| Angles (°) | |||||
| Cl–M–O(3) | 92 | 99 | 82 | / | / |
| Cl–M–O(2) | 124 | 123 | 95 | / | / |
| O(2)–M–O(1) | 96 | 95 | 96 | / | / |
| O(1)–M–O(3) | 103 | 105 | 87 | / | / |
| Dihedral angle (°) | |||||
| Cl–O(3)–O(1)–O(2) | 281 | 282 | 356 | / | / |
| Bond length (Å) | |||||
| M–O(1) | 1.939 | 1.964 | 1.925 | / | / |
| M–O(2) | 1.925 | 1.965 | 1.921 | / | / |
| M–O(3) | 2.095 | 2.089 | 2.127 | / | / |
| M–Cl | 2.247 | 2.320 | 2.313 | / | / |
| C(4)–C(5) | 1.407 | 1.414 | 1.406 | 1.371 | 1.521 |
| C(4)–C(9) | 1.411 | 1.415 | 1.408 | 1.430 | 1.521 |
Figure 4DFT contour plots of the HOMO and LUMO states of Cur-Enol and Cur-Anti-diketone (positive lobs are in green and negative lobs in blood-red); Isovalue = 0.02.
Decomposition in orbital terms EPauli, Eelec, and EOrb (eV) and Charge Metal of Cur-M complexes (where M = Ni, Cu, and Mg).
| EPauli | Eelec | EOrb | %Cov | %Ion | Charge Metal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Ni | 5.5076 | −7.4296 | −10.4167 | 16 | 84 | 0.446 |
| Cur-Cu | 6.0406 | −13.6989 | −9.6546 | 44 | 56 | 0.436 |
| Cur-Mg | 2.6042 | −3.3271 | −8.6136 | 08 | 92 | 0.488 |
The results of ETS analysis of cur-M complexes (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg). Values are expressed in kcal/mol.
| EPauli | EOrb (%) | Eelec (%) | Eint | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Ni | 130.38 | −236.11 (29%) | −264.62 (71%) | −370.35 |
| Cur-Cu | 138.37 | −283.76 (43%) | −195.43 (57%) | −340.82 |
| Cur-Mg | 59.89 | −79.92 (09%) | −198.31 (91%) | −218.34 |
Figure 5Natural orbitals for chemical valence (NOCV) pairs contours in cur-M (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg). Isovalue = 0.001.
Topological properties of the critical point (A, B, and C) for hydrogen bonds (in atomic units) of curcumin and its complexes Cur-M (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg).
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Enol | ||||
| B | 0.0220 | 0.1081 | 0.8652 | 0.0032 |
| C | 0.0220 | 0.1082 | 0.8651 | 0.0032 |
| A | 0.1066 | 0.0816 | 1.7163 | −0.0515 |
| Cur-Anti diketone | ||||
| B | 0.0220 | 0.1082 | 0.8654 | 0.0032 |
| C | 0.0220 | 0.1082 | 0.8657 | 0.0032 |
| Cur-Ni | ||||
| B | 0.0221 | 0.1079 | 0.8669 | 0.0032 |
| C | 0.0217 | 0.1084 | 0.8620 | 0.0032 |
| Cur-Cu | ||||
| B | 0.0220 | 0.1081 | 0.8655 | 0.0032 |
| C | 0.0219 | 0.1083 | 0.8645 | 0.0032 |
| A | 0.0240 | 0.0773 | 0.9529 | 0.0009 |
| Cur-Mg | ||||
| B | 0.0220 | 0.1077 | 0.8658 | 0.0032 |
| C | 0.0219 | 0.1080 | 0.8648 | 0.0032 |
Figure 6Representation of the critical points of the Cur-Enol, Cur-Anti diketone, and the Cur-M complexes (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg). (: critical point).
Values of BDE, IP (in kcal mol−1), and HOMO of curcumin active positions (A, B, and C) and its complexes Cur-M (where M = Ni, Cu, and Mg).
| Positions | BDE | IP | HOMO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Enol | B | 136.12 | 125.10 | −5.184 |
| C | 135.73 | |||
| A | 161.85 | |||
| Cur-Anti-diketone | B | 136.84 | 131.64 | −5.392 |
| C | 136.80 | |||
| Cur-Ni | B | 149.60 | 118.37 | −5.164 |
| C | 149.20 | |||
| Cur-Cu | B | 143.60 | 147.35 | −5.208 |
| C | 143.58 | |||
| Cur-Mg | B | 143.36 | 115.45 | −5.073 |
| C | 143.35 |
Solubility (g/L) of curcumin and its complexes in different solvents.
| Benzene | DMSO | Acetone | Octanol | Ethanol | Methanol | Water | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cur-Anti diketone | 1083.23 | 991.50 | 821.19 | 821.19 | 208.44 | 146.99 | 0.00112 |
| Cur-Enol | 664.76 | 549.83 | 29.97 | 29.97 | 43.41 | 29.85 | 0.00011 |
| Cur-Ni | 0.0090 | 479.54 | 479.54 | 4.12 | 183.38 | 274.28 | 0.0043 |
| Cur-Cu | 0.00020 | 484.39 | 484.39 | 1.22 | 77.58 | 90.86 | 0.0009 |
| Cur-Mg | 445.15 | 445.15 | 1.64 | 9.04E5 | 0.0049 | 0.0026 | 14.44 |
Figure 7Solubility (g/L) of curcumin and its complexes Cur-M (M = Ni, Cu, and Mg).