| Literature DB >> 35268606 |
Arthur Ferrari Teixeira1, Jacqueline de Souza2, Douglas Daniel Dophine1, José Dias de Souza Filho3, Dênia Antunes Saúde-Guimarães1.
Abstract
In vivo assays and chemical analyses were performed on the ethanolic extract from leaves of Eruca sativa. UHPLC-ESI-QTOF analysis confirmed the presence of glucosinolates and flavonol glucosides. The major flavonoid of the ethanolic extract, kaempferol-3,4'-di-O-β-glucoside, was isolated, a HPLC-DAD method developed and validated to quantify its content in the extract. In vivo experiments were carried out on Wistar rats with hyperuricaemia induced by potassium oxonate and uric acid. A hypouricaemic effect was observed in hyperuricaemic Wistar rats treated with ethanolic extract at dose of 125 mg/kg and kaempferol-3,4'-di-O-β-glucoside at dose of 10 mg/kg. The main anti-hyperuricaemic mechanism observed in the extract was uricosuric. Kaempferol-3,4'-di-O-β-glucoside was identified as an important component responsible for the total activity of the ethanolic extract and was considered as a good chemical and biological marker of the ethanolic extract of E. sativa. The obtained results indicated the potential of E. sativa in the treatment of hyperuricaemia and its comorbidities.Entities:
Keywords: NMR; UHPLC/ESI/QTOF; glucosinolate; glucosylated flavonols; hyperuricaemia; rocket; validation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35268606 PMCID: PMC8911632 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27051506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Chromatographic profile of ethanolic extract of Eruca sativa leaves and comparison of UV-spectra of MF peak and kaempferol. (a) Chromatogram of the ethanolic extract of Eruca sativa leaves obtained by HPLC-DAD at 264 nm. (b) UV spectra of MF peak extracted from chromatogram of Figure 1a. (c) UV spectra of kaempferol standard injected independently at the same chromatographic conditions of MF peak.
Substances identified by UHPLC-ESI-QTOF in the ethanolic extract of Eruca sativa leaves.
| Chemical Compound | RT (min) | Experimental Mass Data ESI+ | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glucosativin glucosinolate | 1.0 | 328.1384; 166.0861 | [ |
| Leucine | 1.4 | 182.0808; 268.1037; 132.1019 | Fiocruz |
| Glucoraphanin glucosinolate | 1.8 | 438.0554; 196.0457; 358.0987 | [ |
| Tryptophan | 4.2 | 188.0702, 146.0601; 205.0968 | Fiocruz |
| Kaempferol-3,4′-di- | 12.6 | 611.1598; 449.1070; 287.0544 | [ |
| Angustione | 14.5 | 197.1168; 179.1062 | Fiocruz |
| Kaempferol-3- | 15.1 | 449.1068; 287.0544 | [ |
| Kaempferol-3- | 16.2 | 817.2178; 817,2166; 655,1641; 369,1166; 207,0646 | [ |
| Erucamide | 46.4 | 338,3423 | Fiocruz |
Figure 2Diglucoside nature of the flavonoid. (a) Aromatic region; (b) sugar moieties region; (c) HSQC expansion of the pyranosidic protons focusing correlations of the two methylenic groups (DEPT135 in vertical F1 projection) and (d) complete chemical structure.
NMR data of kaempferol-3,4′-di-O-β-glucoside (400 MHz, DMSO-d6, 300 K).
| Peak | C-n | H-n ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 177.49 | C-4 | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | 164.81 | C-7 | --- | 6.21; 6.45 | --- |
| 3 | 161.20 | C-4′ | --- | 5.03; 8.12 | --- |
| 4 | 159.24 | C-9 | --- | 6.45 | --- |
| 5 | 156.55 | C-5 | --- | 6.21 | --- |
| 6 | 155.53 | C-2 | --- | 8.12 | --- |
| 7 | 133.72 | C-3 | --- | 5.48 | --- |
| 8 | 130.63 | C-2′,6′ | 8.12 | 8.12 | H-2′,6′ |
| 9 | 123.76 | C-1′ | --- | 7.16 | --- |
| 10 | 115.83 | C-3′,5′ | 7.16 | 7.16 | H-3′,5′ |
| 11 | 103.96 | C-10 | --- | 6.21; 6.45 | --- |
| 12 | 100.86 | C-1A | 5.48 | nd | H-1A (7.50) |
| 13 | 99.97 | C-1B | 5.03 | nd | H-1B (7.25) |
| 14 | 98.93 | C-6 | 6.21 | 6.45 | H-6 (1.73) |
| 15 | 93.85 | C-8 | 6.45 | 6.21 | H-8 (1.73) |
| 16 | 77.62 | C-5B | 3.09 | nd | H-5B |
| 17 | 77.10 | C-5A | 3.39 | nd | H-5A |
| 18 | 76.52 | C-3A | 3.29 | nd | H-3A |
| 19 | 76.44 | C-3B | 3.22 | nd | H-3B |
| 20 | 74.21 | C-2A | 3.17 | nd | H-2A |
| 21 | 73.23 | C-2B | 3.27 | nd | H-2B |
| 22 | 69.91 | C-4B | 3.08 | nd | H-4B |
| 23 | 69.58 | C-4A | 3.19 | nd | H-4A |
| 24 | 60.87 | C-6B | 3.57; 3.33 | nd | H-6a,b-B |
| 25 | 60.63 | C-6A | 3.69; 3.48 | nd | H-6a,b-A |
nd—not defined.
Figure 3(a) COSY expanded contour plot of the aromatic region showing the AA’BB’ and AB coupling systems; (b) COSY expanded contour plot of the pyranosidic region; (c) HSQC expanded contour plot of the pyranosidic region showing the precise chemical shifts; (d) assignments of the pyranosidic unities and (e) HMBC expanded contour plot showing the kaempferol 3 and 4′ glucosilated positions.
Figure 4Biological effects in hyperuricaemic Wistar rats after treatments with E. sativa ethanolic extracts and positive controls allopurinol, probenecid and benzobromarone (a) Seric concentrations of uric acid (b) Excretion of uric acid (c) Urine volume excreted after 5 h of the treatment. *** p < 0.001 vs. hyperuricaemic control group; ### p < 0.001 vs. normal control group; #### p < 0.0001 vs. normal control group; **** p < 0.0001 vs. hyperuricaemic control group; *** p < 0.001 vs. hyperuricaemic control group; ** p < 0.01 vs. hyperuricaemic control group; * p < 0.05 vs. hyperuricaemic control group (n = 6, One-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnet test).
Linearity, repeatability, intermediate precision and accuracy of the HPLC-DAD quantification method of kaempferol-3,4′-di-O-β-glucoside in the ethanolic extract of E. sativa on days 1 and 2.
| Day | Linearity | Concentration Level | RSD % | Accuracy % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y = 3.364e + 0.007X − 44233 | Lowest | 1.0 | 102.7–99.0 |
| Medium | 3.5 | 100.6–94.5 | ||
| Highest | 1.7 | 98.5–96.9 | ||
| 2 | Y = 3.422e + 0.007X − 53351 | Lowest | 5.4 | 101.0–92.7 |
| Medium | 6.9 | 104.0–93.5 | ||
| Highest | 2.4 | 99.4–96.9 |