| Literature DB >> 35267596 |
Daniela Cochicho1,2, Susana Esteves3, Miguel Rito4, Fernanda Silva1, Luís Martins2, Pedro Montalvão5, Mário Cunha2, Miguel Magalhães5, Rui M Gil da Costa6,7,8,9, Ana Felix1,4.
Abstract
PIK3CA mutations are believed to contribute to the pathogenesis of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). This study aims to establish the frequency of PIK3CA mutations in a Portuguese HNSCC cohort and to determine their association with the HPV status and patient survival. A meta-analysis of scientific literature also revealed widely different mutation rates in cohorts from different world regions and a trend towards improved prognosis among patients with PIK3CA mutations. DNA samples were available from 95 patients diagnosed with HNSCC at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology in Lisbon between 2010 and 2019. HPV status was established based on viral DNA detected using real-time PCR. The evaluation of PIK3CA gene mutations was performed by real-time PCR for four mutations (H1047L; E542K, E545K, and E545D). Thirty-seven cases were found to harbour PIK3CA mutations (39%), with the E545D mutation (73%) more frequently detected. There were no significant associations between the mutational status and HPV status (74% WT and 68% MUT were HPV (+); p = 0.489) or overall survival (OS) (3-year OS: WT 54% and MUT 65%; p = 0.090). HPV status was the only factor significantly associated with both OS and disease-free survival (DFS), with HPV (+) patients having consistently better outcomes (3-year OS: HPV (+) 65% and HPV (-) 36%; p = 0.007; DFS HPV (+) 83% and HPV (-) 43%; p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant interaction effect between HPV status and PIK3CA mutation regarding DFS (Interaction test: p = 0.026). In HPV (+) patients, PIK3CA wild-type is associated with a significant 4.64 times increase in the hazard of recurrence or death (HR = 4.64; 95% CI 1.02-20.99; p = 0.047). Overall, PIK3CA gene mutations are present in a large number of patients and may help define patient subsets who can benefit from therapies targeting the PI3K pathway. The systematic assessment of PIK3CA gene mutations in HNSCC patients will require further methodological standardisation.Entities:
Keywords: HNSCC; HPV; PIK3CA; p16 INK4a
Year: 2022 PMID: 35267596 PMCID: PMC8909011 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051286
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancers (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6694 Impact factor: 6.639
Clinical, pathological, and demographic characteristics and association with PIK3CA mutation.
| Variable Categories | PIK3CA Evaluation | Total Cases | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WT ( | MUT ( | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 45 (77.6%) | 25 (67.6%) | 70 (73.7%) | 0.2795 |
| Female | 13 (22.4%) | 12 (32.4%) | 25 (26.3%) | |
| Age at diagnosis | ||||
| Mean (Standard Deviation) | 62 (10.7) | 62 (12.7) | 62 (11.5) | 0.9740 |
| ≥65 Years | 24 (41.4%) | 12 (32.4%) | 36 (37.9%) | 0.3807 |
| <65 Years | 34 (58.6%) | 25 (67.6%) | 59 (62.1%) | |
| Consumption habits (tobacco and/or alcohol) | ||||
| Active consumption | 44 (75.9%) | 22 (59.5%) | 66 (69.5%) | 0.0325 * |
| Alcohol active | 18 (31.0%) | 10 (27%) | 28 (29.5%) | |
| Tobacco active | 7 (12.1%) | 1 (2.7%) | 8 (8.4%) | |
| Both active | 19 (32.8%) | 11 (29.7%) | 30 (39.6%) | |
| No consumption | 9 (15.5%) | 13 (35.1%) | 22 (23.2%) | |
| Never | 5 (8.6%) | 10 (27%) | 15 (15.8%) | |
| Nonactive | 4 (6.9%) | 3 (8.1%) | 7 (7.4%) | |
| No data | 5 (8.6%) | 2 (5.4%) | 7 (7.4%) | |
| Tumour Anatomic region | ||||
| Oropharynx | 46 (79.3%) | 29 (78.4%) | 75 (78.9%) | 0.9135 |
| Oral cavity | 12 (20.7%) | 8 (21.6%) | 20 (21.1%) | |
| Tumour stage | ||||
| I | 4 (6.9%) | 4 (10.8%) | 8 (8.4%) | 0.9342 |
| II | 11 (19%) | 8 (21.6%) | 19 (20.0%) | |
| III | 16 (27.6%) | 10 (27.0%) | 26 (27.4%) | |
| IV | 25 (43.1%) | 15 (40.5%) | 40 (42.1%) | |
| No data | 2 (3.4%) | 0 | 2 (2.1%) | |
| p16 IHQ | ||||
| HNSCC p16(−) | 29 (50.0%) | 24 (64.9%) | 53 (55.8%) | 0.1627 |
| HNSCC p16(+) | 25 (43.1%) | 11 (29.7%) | 36 (37.9%) | |
| No data | 4 (6.9%) | 2 (5.4%) | 6 (6.3%) | |
| HPV infection | ||||
| HPV16 DNA(−) | 15 (25.9%) | 12 (32.4%) | 27(28.4%) | 0.4887 |
| HPV16 DNA(+) | 43 (74.1%) | 25 (67.6%) | 68 (71.6%) | |
| Single infection | 39 (90.7%) | 23 (92.0%) | 62 (91.2%) | |
| Co infection with other HR/LR HPV | 4 (9.3%) | 2 (8%) | 6 (8.8%) | |
| Primary Treatment | ||||
| Surgery | 1 (1.7%) | 2 (5.4%) | 3 (3.2%) | 0.7376 |
| Radiotherapy (RT) | 10 (17.2%) | 6 (16.2%) | 16 (16.8%) | |
| Chemotherapy (CTX) | 46 (79.3%) | 29 (78.4%) | 75 (78.9%) | |
| CTX + RT | 26 (56.5%) | 12 (41.4%) | 38 (50.7%) | |
| Surgery + RT | 9 (19.6%) | 11 (37.9%) | 20 (26.7%) | |
| Surgery + CTX | 11 (23.9%) | 6 (20.7%) | 17(22.7%) | |
| No data | 1 (1.7%) | 0 | 1 (1.1%) | |
| Treatment response | ||||
| Complete | 38 (65.5%) | 28 (75.7%) | 66 (69.5%) | 0.5190 |
| Persistence | 11 (19.0%) | 6 (16.2%) | 17 (17.9%) | |
| No data | 9 (15.5%) | 3 (8.1%) | 12 (12.6%) | |
Legend: No data = no information available; RT = Radiotherapy; CTX = Chemotherapy; * p-value calculate for active vs. no consumption group.
Frequency of PIK3CA mutations in HNSCC with and without HPV DNA and p16INK4a overexpression (n = 89; p16 missing data n = 6).
| HNSCC | PIK3CA Gene | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| WT | MUT | ||
| HPV (+) | p16(+) | 22 (68.8%) | 10 (31.3%) |
| p16(−) | 17 (56.7%) | 13 (43.3%) | |
| HPV (−) | p16(+) | 3 (75%) | 1 (25%) |
| p16(−) | 12 (52.2%) | 11 (47.8%) | |
Classification of PIK3CA gene mutations (substitutions H1047L and E542K, E545K, and E545D).
| HPV Status | PIK3CA Gene MUT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Substitution | Two Substitutions | ||||||
| E545D | E545K | E542K | H1047R | E545D|E545K | E545D|E542K | E545D|H1047R | |
| HPV (+) | 76% (19) | 8% (2) | 4% (1) | 4% (1) | 8% (2) | ND | ND |
| HPV (−) | 67% (8) | ND | ND | ND | 8% (1) | 17% (2) | 8% (1) |
| Total | 73% (27) | 5% (2) | 3% (1) | 3% (1) | 8% (3) | 5% (2) | 3% (1) |
Legend: ND = not detected.
PIK3CA mutation, HPV, and p16 status association with the overall and disease-free survival by univariable analysis.
| Overall Survival | Disease-Free Survival | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (Years) | 3-Year | HR (95%CI) | Median, (Years) | 3-Year | HR (95% CI) | |||
| PIK3CA | ||||||||
| MUT | 6.2 | 65 (50–83) | 1 | 0.090 | NR | 77 (63–95) | 1 | 0.198 |
| WT | 4.0 | 54 (41–70) | 1.71 (0.91–3.18) | 4.8 | 72 (58–90) | 1.80 (0.73–4.42) | ||
| HPV status | ||||||||
| Positive | 5.8 | 65 (54–78) | 1 | 0.007 | NR | 83 (72–94) | 1 | 0.001 |
| Not detected | 2.4 | 36 (19–69) | 2.40 (1.15–4.61) | 2.2 | 43 (21–90) | 4.81 (1.74–13.29) | ||
| p16 overexpression | ||||||||
| No | 2.6 | 46 (33–64) | 1 | 0.089 | 4.8 | 59 (44–80) | 1 | 0.029 |
| Yes | 6.9 | 73 (60–90) | 0.58 (0.31–1.10) | NR | 91 (81–100) | 0.34 (0.13–0.94) | ||
* Log-rank test; HR = Hazard Ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval; NR = Not Reached; MUT = mutated; Wt = wild-type.
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier curves comparing patients with PIK3CA-mutated vs. the wild-type at diagnosis (A). Overall survival (Log-rank test chi-square = 2.9 with 1 degree of freedom, p = 0.090). (B). Disease-free survival (Log-rank test chi-square = 1.7 with 1 degree of freedom, p = 0.198).
Figure 2Kaplan–Meier curves comparing patients with detected vs. non-detected HPV at diagnosis. (A) Overall survival (Log-rank test chi-square = 7.3 with 1 degree of freedom, p = 0.007). (B) Disease-free survival (Log-rank test chi-square = 11 with 1 degree of freedom, p = 0.001).
Multivariable analysis of the PIK3CA mutation and p16 status association with overall survival, Cox regression model adjusted for HPV status, alcohol/tobacco consumption habits, and age at diagnosis.
| Factor | Coef (SE) | HR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| PIK3CA | 0.056 | ||
| Mutated | 1 | 1 | |
| Wild-type | 0.766 (0.401) | 2.15 (0.98–4.73) | |
| p16 overexpression | 0.670 | ||
| No | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | −0.189 (0.439) | 0.83 (0.35–1.96) | |
| HPV status | 0.016 | ||
| Positive | 1 | 1 | |
| Not detected | 1.069 (0.443) | 2.91 (1.22–6.94) | |
| Consumption habits | 0.040 | ||
| Active | 1 | 1 | |
| No consumption | −1.041 (0.508) | 0.35 (0.13–0.96) | |
| Age at diagnosis * | |||
| Pspline, linear | 0.045 (0.017) | --- | 0.008 |
| Pspline, nonlinear | --- | --- | 0.016 |
Coef = estimated coefficient from the model; SE = standard error of coefficient; HR = Hazard ratio; 95% CI = 95% Confidence Interval. * Smoothing splines was used to adjust for age with a smoothed curve without categorisation or linearity assumption (theta = 0.973, degrees of freedom for age term = 2.66).
Figure 3Kaplan–Meier plots for overall survival (A) and disease-free survival (B) by PIK3CA mutation and HPV status at diagnosis (p = 0.3860).
Multivariable analysis of PIK3CA mutation associated with disease-free survival, Cox regression model adjusted for p16 overexpression, alcohol/tobacco consumption habits, and age at diagnosis.
| Adjusted HR * | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| HPV status positive | |||
| PIK3CA | |||
| Mutated | 1 | ||
| Wild-type | 4.64 | 1.02–20.99 | 0.047 |
| HPV not detected | |||
| PIK3CA | |||
| Mutated | 1 | ||
| Wild-type | 0.38 | 0.06–2.24 | 0.285 |
* Hazard ratio adjusted for p16 overexpression, consumption habits, and age at diagnosis.