PURPOSE: PIK3CA mutation and subsequent activation of the AKT pathway play an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. However, little is known about the prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using 450 resectable colon cancers (stage I to III) in two independent prospective cohorts, we detected PIK3CA mutation in 82 tumors (18%) by pyrosequencing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of colon cancer-specific and overall mortalities, adjusted for patient characteristics and tumoral molecular features, including the CpG island methylation phenotype, microsatellite instability (MSI), LINE-1 hypomethylation, and p53, CIMP, KRAS and BRAF mutation. RESULTS: Compared with patients with PIK3CA wild-type tumors, those with PIK3CA-mutated tumors experienced an increase in colon cancer-specific mortality according to univariate analysis (HR = 1.64; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.86), which persisted after adjusting for other known or potential risk factors for cancer recurrence (including MSI; multivariate HR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.11). The effect of PIK3CA mutation on cancer survival seemed to differ according to KRAS mutational status. Among patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the presence of PIK3CA mutation was associated with a significant increase in colon cancer-specific mortality (HR = 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56 to 9.27). In contrast, PIK3CA mutation conferred no significant effect on mortality among patients with KRAS-mutated tumors (HR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.52 to 2.96). CONCLUSION: Among patients who undergo a curative resection of colon cancer, PIK3CA mutation is associated with shorter cancer-specific survival. The adverse effect of PIK3CA mutation may be potentially limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.
PURPOSE:PIK3CA mutation and subsequent activation of the AKT pathway play an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. However, little is known about the prognostic role of PIK3CA mutation in colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using 450 resectable colon cancers (stage I to III) in two independent prospective cohorts, we detected PIK3CA mutation in 82 tumors (18%) by pyrosequencing. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) of colon cancer-specific and overall mortalities, adjusted for patient characteristics and tumoral molecular features, including the CpG island methylation phenotype, microsatellite instability (MSI), LINE-1 hypomethylation, and p53, CIMP, KRAS and BRAF mutation. RESULTS: Compared with patients with PIK3CA wild-type tumors, those with PIK3CA-mutated tumors experienced an increase in colon cancer-specific mortality according to univariate analysis (HR = 1.64; 95% CI, 0.95 to 2.86), which persisted after adjusting for other known or potential risk factors for cancer recurrence (including MSI; multivariate HR = 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.11). The effect of PIK3CA mutation on cancer survival seemed to differ according to KRAS mutational status. Among patients with KRAS wild-type tumors, the presence of PIK3CA mutation was associated with a significant increase in colon cancer-specific mortality (HR = 3.80; 95% CI, 1.56 to 9.27). In contrast, PIK3CA mutation conferred no significant effect on mortality among patients with KRAS-mutated tumors (HR = 1.25; 95% CI, 0.52 to 2.96). CONCLUSION: Among patients who undergo a curative resection of colon cancer, PIK3CA mutation is associated with shorter cancer-specific survival. The adverse effect of PIK3CA mutation may be potentially limited to patients with KRAS wild-type tumors.
Authors: Yardena Samuels; Zhenghe Wang; Alberto Bardelli; Natalie Silliman; Janine Ptak; Steve Szabo; Hai Yan; Adi Gazdar; Steven M Powell; Gregory J Riggins; James K V Willson; Sanford Markowitz; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Victor E Velculescu Journal: Science Date: 2004-03-11 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M J Stampfer; W C Willett; F E Speizer; D C Dysert; R Lipnick; B Rosner; C H Hennekens Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1984-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Daniel Vallböhmer; Wu Zhang; Michael Gordon; Dong Yun Yang; Jim Yun; Oliver A Press; Katrin E Rhodes; Andy E Sherrod; Syma Iqbal; Kathleen D Danenberg; Susan Groshen; Heinz-Josef Lenz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C R Boland; S N Thibodeau; S R Hamilton; D Sidransky; J R Eshleman; R W Burt; S J Meltzer; M A Rodriguez-Bigas; R Fodde; G N Ranzani; S Srivastava Journal: Cancer Res Date: 1998-11-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: J Abubaker; P Bavi; S Al-Harbi; M Ibrahim; A K Siraj; N Al-Sanea; A Abduljabbar; L H Ashari; S Alhomoud; F Al-Dayel; S Uddin; K S Al-Kuraya Journal: Oncogene Date: 2008-01-14 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Arantza Fariña Sarasqueta; Eliane C M Zeestraten; Tom van Wezel; Gesina van Lijnschoten; Ronald van Eijk; Jan Willem T Dekker; Peter J K Kuppen; Ines J Goossens-Beumer; Valery E P P Lemmens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Harm J T Rutten; Hans Morreau; A J C van den Brule Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 6.730
Authors: Rona Yaeger; Elizabeth Cowell; Joanne F Chou; Alexandra N Gewirtz; Laetitia Borsu; Efsevia Vakiani; David B Solit; Neal Rosen; Marinela Capanu; Marc Ladanyi; Nancy Kemeny Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-12-09 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Prasanth Ganesan; Filip Janku; Aung Naing; David S Hong; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Gerald S Falchook; Jennifer J Wheler; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Siqing Fu; Vanda M Stepanek; J Jack Lee; Rajyalakshmi Luthra; Michael J Overman; E Scott Kopetz; Robert A Wolff; Razelle Kurzrock Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 6.261