Literature DB >> 35262831

Multi-center evaluation of artificial intelligent imaging and clinical models for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in breast cancer.

Tan Hong Qi1, Ong Hiok Hian2, Arjunan Muthu Kumaran1, Tira J Tan3,4, Tan Ryan Ying Cong3,4, Ghislaine Lee Su-Xin1, Elaine Hsuen Lim3, Raymond Ng3,4, Ming Chert Richard Yeo1,4, Faye Lynette Lim Wei Tching1,4, Zhang Zewen3,4, Christina Yang Shi Hui5,6, Wong Ru Xin1,4, Su Kai Gideon Ooi7,4, Lester Chee Hao Leong8, Su Ming Tan9, Madhukumar Preetha5,6, Yirong Sim5,6, Veronique Kiak Mien Tan5,6, Joe Yeong10,11, Wong Fuh Yong12,13, Yiyu Cai14, Wen Long Nei15,16.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plays an important role in the management of locally advanced breast cancer. It allows for downstaging of tumors, potentially allowing for breast conservation. NAC also allows for in-vivo testing of the tumors' response to chemotherapy and provides important prognostic information. There are currently no clearly defined clinical models that incorporate imaging with clinical data to predict response to NAC. Thus, the aim of this work is to develop a predictive AI model based on routine CT imaging and clinical parameters to predict response to NAC.
METHODS: The CT scans of 324 patients with NAC from multiple centers in Singapore were used in this study. Four different radiomics models were built for predicting pathological complete response (pCR): first two were based on textural features extracted from peri-tumoral and tumoral regions, the third model based on novel space-resolved radiomics which extract feature maps using voxel-based radiomics and the fourth model based on deep learning (DL). Clinical parameters were included to build a final prognostic model.
RESULTS: The best performing models were based on space-resolved and DL approaches. Space-resolved radiomics improves the clinical AUCs of pCR prediction from 0.743 (0.650 to 0.831) to 0.775 (0.685 to 0.860) and our DL model improved it from 0.743 (0.650 to 0.831) to 0.772 (0.685 to 0.853). The tumoral radiomics model performs the worst with no improvement of the AUC from the clinical model. The peri-tumoral combined model gives moderate performance with an AUC of 0.765 (0.671 to 0.855).
CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics features extracted from diagnostic CT augment the predictive ability of pCR when combined with clinical features. The novel space-resolved radiomics and DL radiomics approaches outperformed conventional radiomics techniques.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Breast cancer; Deep learning; Machine learning; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Radiomics

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35262831     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-022-06521-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  27 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Petra Macaskill; Gunter von Minckwitz; Michael L Marinovich; Eleftherios Mamounas
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  Surgical issues in patients with breast cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tari A King; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  I-SPY 2: an adaptive breast cancer trial design in the setting of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  A D Barker; C C Sigman; G J Kelloff; N M Hylton; D A Berry; L J Esserman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Clinical Applicability of Deep Learning System in Detecting Tuberculosis with Chest Radiography.

Authors:  Daniel S W Ting; Paul H Yi; Ferdinand Hui
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Radiomics in radiooncology - Challenging the medical physicist.

Authors:  Jan C Peeken; Michael Bernhofer; Benedikt Wiestler; Tatyana Goldberg; Daniel Cremers; Burkhard Rost; Jan J Wilkens; Stephanie E Combs; Fridtjof Nüsslin
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.685

7.  Oncogenic targets Mmp7, S100a9, Nppb and Aldh1a3 from transcriptome profiling of FAP and Pirc adenomas are downregulated in response to tumor suppression by Clotam.

Authors:  Furkan U Ertem; Wenqian Zhang; Kyle Chang; Wan Mohaiza Dashwood; Praveen Rajendran; Deqiang Sun; Ala Abudayyeh; Eduardo Vilar; Maen Abdelrahim; Roderick H Dashwood
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the rate of breast conservation: results from the National Cancer Database.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Vicky Q Yang; Sarah Mougalian; Nina R Horowitz; Lajos Pusztai; Anees B Chagpar; Donald R Lannin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 9.  Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis.

Authors:  Patricia Cortazar; Lijun Zhang; Michael Untch; Keyur Mehta; Joseph P Costantino; Norman Wolmark; Hervé Bonnefoi; David Cameron; Luca Gianni; Pinuccia Valagussa; Sandra M Swain; Tatiana Prowell; Sibylle Loibl; D Lawrence Wickerham; Jan Bogaerts; Jose Baselga; Charles Perou; Gideon Blumenthal; Jens Blohmer; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Jonas Bergh; Vladimir Semiglazov; Robert Justice; Holger Eidtmann; Soonmyung Paik; Martine Piccart; Rajeshwari Sridhara; Peter A Fasching; Leen Slaets; Shenghui Tang; Bernd Gerber; Charles E Geyer; Richard Pazdur; Nina Ditsch; Priya Rastogi; Wolfgang Eiermann; Gunter von Minckwitz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Evidence Supporting LI-RADS Major Features for CT- and MR Imaging-based Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  An Tang; Mustafa R Bashir; Michael T Corwin; Irene Cruite; Christoph F Dietrich; Richard K G Do; Eric C Ehman; Kathryn J Fowler; Hero K Hussain; Reena C Jha; Adib R Karam; Adrija Mamidipalli; Robert M Marks; Donald G Mitchell; Tara A Morgan; Michael A Ohliger; Amol Shah; Kim-Nhien Vu; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Delta-Radiomics Based on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Predicts Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Liangcun Guo; Siyao Du; Si Gao; Ruimeng Zhao; Guoliang Huang; Feng Jin; Yuee Teng; Lina Zhang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 6.575

2.  Early prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on longitudinal ultrasound images of HER2-positive breast cancer patients by Siamese multi-task network: A multicentre, retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Ying Wang; Yuxiang Wang; Yu Xie; Yanfen Cui; Senwen Feng; Mengxia Yao; Bingjiang Qiu; Wenqian Shen; Dong Chen; Guoqing Du; Xin Chen; Zaiyi Liu; Zhenhui Li; Xiaotang Yang; Changhong Liang; Lei Wu
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-07-30

3.  Ultrasound-based radiomics analysis for differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions: From static images to CEUS video analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Yan Zhu; Han-Lu He; Zi-Mei Lin; Jian-Qiang Zhao; Xiao-Chun Jiang; Zhe-Hao Liang; Xiao-Ping Huang; Hai-Wei Bao; Pin-Tong Huang; Fen Chen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.