Literature DB >> 25868410

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer increases the rate of breast conservation: results from the National Cancer Database.

Brigid K Killelea1, Vicky Q Yang2, Sarah Mougalian3, Nina R Horowitz4, Lajos Pusztai3, Anees B Chagpar4, Donald R Lannin4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to increase the rate of breast conservation in clinical trials and small institutional series, but it has never been studied on a national level. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The NCDB is a joint project of the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American Cancer Society and contains about 80% of the cancer cases in the United States. All women in the NCDB diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2006 through 2011, who underwent definitive breast surgery and received either neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, excluding patients with distant metastases or T4 tumors, were included and rates of breast preservation were determined.
RESULTS: Of 354,204 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 59,063 (16.7%) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This proportion steadily increased from 13.9% in 2006 to 20.5% in 2011 (p<0.001). Receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with larger tumor size (7% cT1, 25% cT2, and 58% cT3; p<0.001), more advanced nodal disease (11% cN0, 39% cN1-3; p<0.001), younger patient age (21%<50 years vs 14%>50 years; p<0.001), higher tumor grade (18% grade 3, 15% grade 2, vs 12% grade 1; p<0.001), and estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors (21% ER negative vs 15% ER postive; p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that when adjusted for the above variables, patients with tumors larger than 3 cm undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were more likely to receive breast preservation than those who opted for primary surgery (odds ratio 1.7, 95% CI 1.6 to 1.8).
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy increases breast preservation for patients with breast tumor size larger than 3 cm.
Copyright © 2015 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25868410     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  42 in total

1.  Does response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy impact breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Babak Mehrara; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 2.  The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in predicting the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Fangfang Tian; Guohua Shen; Yunfu Deng; Wei Diao; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.

Authors:  Maureen P McEvoy; Jeffrey Landercasper; Himani R Naik; Sheldon Feldman
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Neoadjuvant Management of Early Breast Cancer: A Clinical and Investigational Position Statement.

Authors:  Ramon Colomer; Cristina Saura; Pedro Sánchez-Rovira; Tomás Pascual; Isabel T Rubio; Octavio Burgués; Lourdes Marcos; César A Rodríguez; Miguel Martín; Ana Lluch
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-02-01

5.  Breast conservation versus mastectomy for patients with T3 primary tumors (>5 cm): A review of 5685 medicare patients.

Authors:  Richard J Bleicher; Karen Ruth; Elin R Sigurdson; John M Daly; Marcia Boraas; Penny R Anderson; Brian L Egleston
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy affect morbidity, mortality, reoperations, or readmissions in patients undergoing lumpectomy or mastectomy for breast cancer?

Authors:  Jeffrey Landercasper; Barbara Bennie; Mallory S Bray; Choua A Vang; Jared H Linebarger
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

7.  MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Eunhee Kim; Benjamin A Herman; Gillian M Newstead; Mark A Rosen; Mitchell D Schnall; Etta D Pisano; Paul T Weatherall; Elizabeth A Morris; Constance D Lehman; Michael Garwood; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Sandra M Polin; Laura J Esserman; Constantine A Gatsonis; Gregory J Metzger; David C Newitt; Savannah C Partridge; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Racial/ethnic differences in the utilization of chemotherapy among stage I-III breast cancer patients, stratified by subtype: Findings from ten National Program of Cancer Registries states.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Jessica King; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Vivien W Chen; Qingzhao Yu; Elizabeth Fontham; Michelle Loch; Lori A Pollack; Tekeda Ferguson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 9.  Landmark trials in the medical oncology management of early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Whitney Hensing; Cesar A Santa-Maria; Lindsay L Peterson; Jennifer Y Sheng
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Dynamics of circulating tumor DNA during postoperative radiotherapy in patients with residual triple-negative breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Haeyoung Kim; Yeon Jeong Kim; Donghyun Park; Woong-Yang Park; Doo Ho Choi; Won Park; Won Kyung Cho; Nalee Kim
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.