Literature DB >> 22766518

Meta-analysis of the association of breast cancer subtype and pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Nehmat Houssami1, Petra Macaskill, Gunter von Minckwitz, Michael L Marinovich, Eleftherios Mamounas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response (pCR) is a surrogate end-point for prognosis in neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for breast cancer. We aimed to report summary estimates of the proportion of subjects achieving pCR (pCR%) by tumour subtype, and to determine whether subtype was independently associated with pCR, in a study-level meta-analysis.
METHODS: We systematically identified NAC studies reporting pCR data according to tumour subtype, using predefined eligibility criteria. Descriptive, qualitative and quantitative data were extracted. Random effects logistic meta-regression examined whether pCR% was associated with subtype, defined using three categories for model 1 [hormone receptor positive (HR+/HER2-), HER2 positive (HER2+), triple negative (ER-/PR-/HER2-)] and 4 categories for model 2 [HER2+ further classified as HER2+/HR+ and HER2+/HR-]. Subtype-specific odds ratios (OR) were calculated and were adjusted for covariates associated with pCR in our data.
RESULTS: In model 1, based on 11,695 subjects from 30 eligible studies, overall pooled pCR% was 18.9% (16.6-21.5%), and in model 2 (20 studies, 8095 subjects) pooled pCR% was 18.5% (16.2-21.1%); tumour subtype was associated with pCR% (P<0.0001) in both models. Subtype-specific pCR% (model 2) was: 8.3% (6.7-10.2%) in HR+/HER2- [OR 1/referent], 18.7% (15.0-23.1%) in HER2+/HR+ [OR 2.6], 38.9% (33.2-44.9%) in HER2+/HR- [OR 7.1] and 31.1% (26.5-36.1%) in triple negative [OR 5.0]; pCR% was significantly higher for the HER2+/HR- compared with the triple negative subtype, however pCR% was very similar for these subtypes (and OR=5.0 both subtypes) when studies using HER2-directed therapy with NAC were excluded from the model. Neither sensitivity analysis (excluding unknown subtypes), nor adjustment for associated covariates, substantially altered our findings.
INTERPRETATION: This meta-analysis provides evidence of an independent association between breast cancer subtype and pCR; odds of pCR were highest for the triple negative and HER2+/HR- subtypes, with evidence of an influential effect on achieving pCR in the latter subtype through inclusion of HER2-directed therapy with NAC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22766518     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  152 in total

1.  Efficacy of vinorelbine-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Hui Gao; Qiuyun Li; Wei Wei; Y I Jiang; Huawei Yang; Jianlun Liu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-06-09

2.  Effect of Body Mass Index- and Actual Weight-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Doses on Pathologic Complete Response in Operable Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Rachna Raman; Sarah L Mott; Mary C Schroeder; Sneha Phadke; Jad El Masri; Alexandra Thomas
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Does response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy impact breast reconstruction?

Authors:  Michael R Cassidy; Emily C Zabor; Michelle Stempel; Babak Mehrara; Mary L Gemignani
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Predictive and prognostic factors in locally advanced breast cancer: effect of intratumoral FOXP3+ Tregs.

Authors:  Lutfiye Demir; Seyran Yigit; Hulya Ellidokuz; Cigdem Erten; Isil Somali; Yuksel Kucukzeybek; Ahmet Alacacioglu; Suna Cokmert; Alper Can; Murat Akyol; Ahmet Dirican; Vedat Bayoglu; Aysegul Akder Sari; Mustafa Oktay Tarhan
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 5.150

5.  Different methods of pretreatment Ki-67 labeling index evaluation in core biopsies of breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and their relation to response to therapy.

Authors:  András Vörös; Erika Csörgő; Bence Kővári; Péter Lázár; Gyöngyi Kelemen; Orsolya Rusz; Tibor Nyári; Gábor Cserni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-05-25       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Mismatch between perfusion and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Anna Rita Cervino
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Standard Pathologic Features Can Be Used to Identify a Subset of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2 Negative Patients Likely to Benefit from Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Oriana A Petruolo; Melissa Pilewskie; Sujata Patil; Andrea V Barrio; Michelle Stempel; Hannah Y Wen; Monica Morrow
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Prediction of Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer Patients Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Ultrasound in Neoadjuvant Setting.

Authors:  Frederik Knude Palshof; Charlotte Lanng; Niels Kroman; Cemil Benian; Ilse Vejborg; Anne Bak; Maj-Lis Talman; Eva Balslev; Tove Filtenborg Tvedskov
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Impact of sequence order of anthracyclines and taxanes in neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic complete response rate in HER2-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  M E Tesch; S K Chia; C E Simmons; N LeVasseur
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Inference of tumor evolution during chemotherapy by computational modeling and in situ analysis of genetic and phenotypic cellular diversity.

Authors:  Vanessa Almendro; Yu-Kang Cheng; Amanda Randles; Shalev Itzkovitz; Andriy Marusyk; Elisabet Ametller; Xavier Gonzalez-Farre; Montse Muñoz; Hege G Russnes; Aslaug Helland; Inga H Rye; Anne-Lise Borresen-Dale; Reo Maruyama; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Mitchell Dowsett; Robin L Jones; Jorge Reis-Filho; Pere Gascon; Mithat Gönen; Franziska Michor; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 9.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.