Literature DB >> 35261815

Disparities in Cervical Cancer Treatment Options between African American (Black) and White Women in Alabama.

Isra Elhussin1, David Nganwa2, Ronald Peaster3, Oyoyo Egiebor-Aiwan4, Crystal M James4, John Heath5, Lecarde Webb6, Ehsan Abdalla4.   

Abstract

There are disparities in cervical cancer treatment options between African American (Black) and White women in Alabama. The objective of this study was to identify and assess factors contributing to the prevailing inequalities in cervical cancer treatment options between Blacks and Whites, who are living in urban, rural Black Belt (BB), and other rural counties of Alabama. The data of our study population, which was comprised of 2,124 cases of cervical cancer in women 17 years and older, were extracted from the 2004 to 2013 dataset of the Alabama Department of Public Health (ADPH) Cancer Registry. For the analysis of frequency distributions, chi-square, and logistic regression tests SAS software was used. Racial disparities in cervical cancer treatment options for Blacks living within the same counties as Whites still exist. The study analysis showed that younger Blacks living in urban counties with advanced stages of cervical cancer were more likely to receive radiation treatment options but were less likely to undergo surgical treatment options (p-value <.0001). Younger Blacks living in the rural BB and other rural counties were mainly treated with radiation options for the early stages of cervical cancer (p-value 0.001), while older ones received surgery options (p-value <.0001), and combined therapy of surgery and radiation options (p-value 0.05). When adjusted for age, stage of cancer, and county of residence, Blacks had 2.76 (95% CI 0.90-8.86) times the odds ratio of receiving immunotherapy options compared to Whites. Blacks had 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.95) times adjusted odds ratio of undergoing less surgery option compared to Whites. Our study findings suggest that cervical cancer treatment options and control interventions targeted towards disadvantaged women, particularly Blacks living in the rural BB and other rural counties have the potential to reduce and/or eradicate this preventable disease.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alabama counties; Blacks; Cervical cancer; Cervical cancer treatment options; SAS software; Whites; disparities

Year:  2020        PMID: 35261815      PMCID: PMC8900975     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Sci Humanit        ISSN: 2159-8800


  11 in total

1.  Cervical cancer screening: who is not screened and why?

Authors:  L C Harlan; A B Bernstein; L G Kessler
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Immunotherapy for cervical cancer: Research status and clinical potential.

Authors:  Jun-Han Su; Anjui Wu; Elizabeth Scotney; Barbara Ma; Archana Monie; Chien-Fu Hung; T-C Wu
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 5.807

3.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Differences in cervical cancer mortality among black and white women.

Authors:  E A Howell; Y T Chen; J Concato
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Differences in stage at presentation of breast and gynecologic cancers among whites, blacks, and Hispanics.

Authors:  F Chen; E J Trapido; K Davis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Race, stage of disease, and survival with cervical cancer.

Authors:  D Shelton; D Paturzo; J Flannery; D Gregorio
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.847

7.  Induction of tumor-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell immunity in cervical cancer patients by a human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 long peptides vaccine.

Authors:  Marij J P Welters; Gemma G Kenter; Sytse J Piersma; Annelies P G Vloon; Margriet J G Löwik; Dorien M A Berends-van der Meer; Jan W Drijfhout; A Rob P M Valentijn; Amon R Wafelman; Jaap Oostendorp; Gert Jan Fleuren; Rienk Offringa; Cornelis J M Melief; Sjoerd H van der Burg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Black and white women in Maryland receive different treatment for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Saroj Fleming; Nicholas H Schluterman; J Katthleen Tracy; Sarah M Temkin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Management and Care of Women With Invasive Cervical Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Resource-Stratified Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Linus T Chuang; Sarah Temin; Rolando Camacho; Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez; Sarah Feldman; Murat Gultekin; Vandana Gupta; Susan Horton; Graciela Jacob; Elizabeth A Kidd; Kennedy Lishimpi; Carolyn Nakisige; Joo-Hyun Nam; Hextan Yuen Sheung Ngan; William Small; Gillian Thomas; Jonathan S Berek
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2016-05-25

10.  Insurance status and cancer treatment mediate the association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival.

Authors:  Sarah C Markt; Tianyu Tang; Angel M Cronin; Ingrid T Katz; Brooke E Howitt; Neil S Horowitz; Larissa J Lee; Alexi A Wright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.