Literature DB >> 8194025

Differences in stage at presentation of breast and gynecologic cancers among whites, blacks, and Hispanics.

F Chen1, E J Trapido, K Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the possible assumptions for the higher mortality from cancer of blacks versus whites is that blacks tend to be diagnosed relatively more often with later stage disease. This study examined the stages at diagnosis for female breast cancer and other gynecologic cancers among blacks, non-Hispanic whites, and Hispanic whites.
METHODS: Data for Dade County were analyzed in this study, which was based on the tumor registry data from the Florida Cancer Data System from 1981-1989. The stages at diagnosis were classified as in situ, local, regional, and distant according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology coding rules.
RESULTS: The percentage of early stage diagnoses (in situ and local stage) was significantly lower among blacks and Hispanic whites than among non-Hispanic whites, but only for breast and cervical cancer. There was a significant increase in the percentage of early stage diagnoses of breast cancer among all three groups during 1981-1989, whereas this increase was found only in Hispanic whites for cervical cancer. The percentage of in situ cervical cancers was much lower in women older than age 45, especially among women older than age 65, in all three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that screening programs need to be targeted differently for specific age and ethnic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8194025     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11<2838::aid-cncr2820731129>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  19 in total

1.  Breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas and non-Latina whites.

Authors:  Ana F Abraído-Lanza; Maria T Chao; Marilie D Gammon
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Cervical cancer among Hispanic women: assessing the impact on farmworkers.

Authors:  Faith Boucher; Marc B Schenker
Journal:  J Immigr Health       Date:  2002-07

3.  Acculturation and cancer screening among Latinas: results from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Ana F Abraído-Lanza; Maria T Chao; Charisse Y Gates
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2005-02

4.  Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram.

Authors:  Rebecca Press; Olveen Carrasquillo; Robert R Sciacca; Elsa-Grace V Giardina
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 5.  Cost-effective policies for cervical cancer screening. An international review.

Authors:  M C Fahs; S B Plichta; J S Mandelblatt
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Breast cancer prevention and control among the medically underserved.

Authors:  J F Kerner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Breast cancer size and stage in Hispanic American women, by birthplace: 1992-1995.

Authors:  A N Hedeen; E White
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Risk factors for breast cancer in a black population--the Barbados National Cancer Study.

Authors:  Barbara Nemesure; Suh-Yuh Wu; Ian R Hambleton; M Cristina Leske; Anselm J Hennis
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 9.  Pattern of breast cancer among white-American, African-American, and nonimmigrant west-African women.

Authors:  T G Ijaduola; E B Smith
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.798

10.  Mammography screening and differences in stage of disease by race/ethnicity.

Authors:  Jillian Jacobellis; Gary Cutter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.