E A Howell1, Y T Chen, J Concato. 1. Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, the Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8025, USA. elizabeth.howell@yale.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stage of disease and treatment patterns account for mortality differences between black and white women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Using data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program for 1988-1994, we determined the associations between race and stage, and race and treatment. Racial differences in survival for up to 7 years of follow-up were adjusted for age, marital status, SEER location, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage of disease, lymph node status, grade, histology, and treatment. RESULTS: Cumulative mortality was 36% (366 deaths in 1029 women) for black women and 24% (1215 deaths in 5021 women) for white women; unadjusted hazard ratio was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43, 1.80). Black women were more likely to present with advanced disease than white women (43.8% compared with 34.8%). In a model adjusting for demographics and FIGO stage, the hazard ratio for black women compared with white women decreased to 1.35 (95% CI 1.19, 1.54). Treatment varied by race, with black women receiving surgery less often (33.5% compared with 48.2%, respectively) and radiation therapy more often (35.3% and 25.2%, respectively) than white women. In a comprehensive model including demographic factors, FIGO stage, other tumor characteristics, and treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality remained high for black women at 1.30 (95% CI 1.14, 1.48). CONCLUSION: Race remains an independent predictor of cervical cancer survival after accounting for age, stage of disease, treatment patterns, and other factors. Future studies should assess racial differences in clinical severity of disease, comorbidity, and socioeconomic status.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether stage of disease and treatment patterns account for mortality differences between black and white women with cervical cancer. METHODS: Using data obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program for 1988-1994, we determined the associations between race and stage, and race and treatment. Racial differences in survival for up to 7 years of follow-up were adjusted for age, marital status, SEER location, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage of disease, lymph node status, grade, histology, and treatment. RESULTS: Cumulative mortality was 36% (366 deaths in 1029 women) for black women and 24% (1215 deaths in 5021 women) for white women; unadjusted hazard ratio was 1.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43, 1.80). Black women were more likely to present with advanced disease than white women (43.8% compared with 34.8%). In a model adjusting for demographics and FIGO stage, the hazard ratio for black women compared with white women decreased to 1.35 (95% CI 1.19, 1.54). Treatment varied by race, with black women receiving surgery less often (33.5% compared with 48.2%, respectively) and radiation therapy more often (35.3% and 25.2%, respectively) than white women. In a comprehensive model including demographic factors, FIGO stage, other tumor characteristics, and treatment, the adjusted hazard ratio for mortality remained high for black women at 1.30 (95% CI 1.14, 1.48). CONCLUSION: Race remains an independent predictor of cervical cancer survival after accounting for age, stage of disease, treatment patterns, and other factors. Future studies should assess racial differences in clinical severity of disease, comorbidity, and socioeconomic status.
Authors: Mehul K Patel; Michele L Cote; Rouba Ali-Fehmi; Thomas Buekers; Adnan R Munkarah; Mohamed A Elshaikh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dede Kossiwa Teteh; Lenna Dawkins-Moultin; Chartay Robinson; Victor LaGroon; Stanley Hooker; Kenneth Alexander; Rick A Kittles Journal: J Community Health Date: 2019-06
Authors: Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Hari Nathan; Joseph M Herman; David Cosgrove; Ihab Kamel; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-09-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Holly C Felix; Janet Bronstein; Zoran Bursac; M Kathryn Stewart; H Russell Foushee; Joshua Klapow Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792