| Literature DB >> 35260768 |
Katarzyna Maliszewska1, Edyta Adamska-Patruno2, K Miniewska3, W Bauer3, M Mojsak4, A Kretowski5.
Abstract
An investigation of new ways to activate brown adipose tissue (BAT) is highly valuable, as it is a possible tool for obesity prevention and treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the relationships between dietary intake and BAT activity. The study group comprised 28 healthy non-smoking males aged 21-42 years. All volunteers underwent a physical examination and 75-g OGTT and completed 3-day food intake diaries to evaluate macronutrients and fatty acid intake. Body composition measurements were assessed using DXA scanning. An FDG-18 PET/MR was performed to visualize BAT activity. Brown adipose tissue was detected in 18 subjects (67% normal-weight individuals and 33% overweight/obese). The presence of BAT corresponded with a lower visceral adipose tissue (VAT) content (p = 0.04, after adjustment for age, daily kcal intake, and DXA Lean mass). We noted significantly lower omega-6 fatty acids (p = 0.03) and MUFA (p = 0.02) intake in subjects with detected BAT activity after adjustment for age, daily average kcal intake, and DXA Lean mass, whereas omega-3 fatty acids intake was comparable between the two groups. BAT presence was positively associated with the concentration of serum IL-6 (p = 0.01) during cold exposure. Our results show that BAT activity may be related to daily omega-6 fatty acids intake.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35260768 PMCID: PMC8904502 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08125-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Characteristics of BAT-positive and BAT-negative group.
| Variable | BAT-positive1 | BAT-negative2 | p-value3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| N | 18 | 10 | |
| BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n, %) | 12 (67%) | (40%) | |
| BMI > 25 kg/m2 (n, %) | 6 (33%) | 6 (60%) | |
| Age (years) | 24.7 ± 2.4 | 30.3 ± 6.7 | 0.006 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.65 ± 3.8 | 28.14 ± 4.2 | Ns |
| VAT mass (g) | 548.05 ± 515 | 1064.7 ± 782 | 0.02 |
| VAT AT (%) | 2.2 ± 1.19 | 3.8 ± 1.9 | 0.007 |
| VAT BW (%) | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.67 | 0.01 |
| VAT volume (cm3) | 609 ± 545 | 1595 ± 838 | 0.02 |
| A/G ratio4 | 1.0 ± 0.15 | 1.2 ± 0.24 | 0.02 |
| MUFA intake (g/day) | 27.9 ± 8.2 | 37.35 ± 9.2 | 0.02 |
| PUFA intake (g/day) | 10.6 ± 2.8 | 12.5 ± 9.2 | Ns |
| Omega-6 intake (g/day) | 7.2 ± 2.37 | 10.2 ± 2.9 | 0.03 |
| Omega-3 intake (g/day) | 2.0 ± 0.99 | 2.9 ± 1.0 | Ns |
| IL-6 V25 0 min (pg/ml) | 756.8 ± 272 | 650.0 ± 215 | Ns |
| IL-6 V25 60 min (pg/ml) | 926.35 ± 205 | 818.79 ± 316 | 0.01 |
| IL-6 V25 120 min (pg/ml) | 970.4 ± 170 | 865.78 ± 308 | 0.01 |
| IL-6 V25 240 min (pg/ml) | 911.88 ± 202 | 943.63 ± 375 | Ns |
| IL-6 AUC V25 (pg/ml × 240 min) | 72,709 ± 22,186 | 56,934 ± 21,496 | 0.07 |
| AUC REE adjusted6 (kcal/min/ffm × 120 min) | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | Ns |
| Δ REE7 | 258.7 ± 289 | 204 ± 384 | Ns |
| Energy intake kcal | 2149 ± 505 | 2171 ± 321 | Ns |
| Carbohydrate intake (g) | 270 ± 70 | 253 ± 46 | Ns |
| Protein intake (g) | 119 ± 41 | 98 ± 27 | Ns |
| Fat intake (g) | 72 ± 21 | 87 ± 21 | Ns |
The parameters in the table are represented by its means and standard deviations. 1BAT-positive—a group of subjects in whom brown adipose tissue was detected; 2BAT-negative—a group of subjects without detectable brown adipose tissue; 3p value—adjusted for age, daily average kcal intake, DXA Lean mass; 4A/G ratio, android to gynoid ratio; 5V2—the second visit—cooling exposure with PET-MR; 6AUC whole-body energy expenditure adjusted for age, daily kcal intake, DXA Lean mass, 7a change of whole-body resting energy expenditure between 0 and 120 min of cold exposure; BMI body mass index, VAT mass the visceral adipose tissue mass, VAT AT (%) the visceral adipose tissue percentage of adipose tissue, VAT BT (%) the visceral adipose tissue percentage of body weight, VAT volume the visceral adipose tissue volume, MUFA Monounsaturated Fatty Acid, PUFA Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid, IL-6 Interleukin 6.
Figure 1A typical PET scan of a BAT-positive subject. The arrows indicate brown fat depots in supraclavicular regions.
Figure 2A typical PET scan of a BAT-negative subject.
Figure 3Omega-6 FA intake in subjects dependently on BAT status (p = 0.03)*.
Figure 4MUFA intake in subjects dependently on BAT status (p = 0.03)*.
Figure 5IL-6 concentration in serum during cold exposure in subjects dependently on BAT status (p = 0.01)**.