Helle H Johannesen1, Johan Löfgren1, Ida Donkin2, Adam E Hansen1, Annika Loft1, Liselotte Højgaard1, Andreas Kjær1. 1. Dept.of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Kragujevac, Denmark. 2. The Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Basic Metabolic Research, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kragujevac, Denmark.
Brown adipose tissue (BAT) is present in human adults and when present visualised with [18F]-FDG PET. It contains large amounts of mitochondriae, which gives a higher water content compared to white adipose tissue and a high FDG avidity when activated [1].Five adults underwent PET/MR. BAT was cold-activated using a water-perfused vest, with injection of 100Mbq FDG after 60 minutes [2]. Hereafter cervical regions were scanned on an Siemens Biograph mMR 3T. PET was performed as single bed 10 minutes acquisition.MRI included DIXON sequence for attenuation correction and axial T2 weighted sequences with and without water suppression, the latter for calculation of water percentage (W%).ROIs were drawn on T2 images omitting vessels and muscle and propagated to PET images and to calculated water percentage maps (Figure 1). Subcutaneous fat regions were used as reference (SC).
Figure 1
T2, water % , T2/PET and PET images.
T2, water % , T2/PET and PET images.FDG-PET identified activated BAT in 3 of 5 subjects. On each scan eight ROIs were drawn, including one reference region (SC). SUVmean for BAT, nBAT and SC were 1.60 (SD 0.26), 0.38 ( 0.12) and 0.64 (0.12) respectively (Figure 2). Calculated water percentage MRI maps for these regions were 19.6% (SD2.9%), 16.5% (4.2%) and 16.8% (1.6%) respectively (Figure 3). No significant difference in W% was found between BAT and nBAT.
Figure 2
Box plot SUV value BAT, SC, nBAT
Figure 3
Box plot W% BAT, SC, nBAT
Box plot SUV value BAT, SC, nBATBox plot W% BAT, SC, nBATNo significant correlation was found between water percentage in fat tissue with or without BAT, maybe because the two modalities measures different physiological properties. Accordingly, BAT can be present but not activated and therefore measurements with both modalities seems necessary for fully characterization of BAT.
Authors: Aaron M Cypess; Sanaz Lehman; Gethin Williams; Ilan Tal; Dean Rodman; Allison B Goldfine; Frank C Kuo; Edwin L Palmer; Yu-Hua Tseng; Alessandro Doria; Gerald M Kolodny; C Ronald Kahn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-04-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Yin-Ching Iris Chen; Aaron M Cypess; Yih-Chieh Chen; Matthew Palmer; Gerald Kolodny; C Ronald Kahn; Kenneth K Kwong Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Bart D van Rooijen; Anouk A J J van der Lans; Boudewijn Brans; Joachim E Wildberger; Felix M Mottaghy; Patrick Schrauwen; Walter H Backes; Wouter D van Marken Lichtenbelt Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Susanna Søberg; Johan Löfgren; Frederik E Philipsen; Michal Jensen; Adam E Hansen; Esben Ahrens; Kristin B Nystrup; Rune D Nielsen; Christine Sølling; Anne-Sophie Wedell-Neergaard; Marianne Berntsen; Annika Loft; Andreas Kjær; Zachary Gerhart-Hines; Helle H Johannesen; Bente K Pedersen; Kristian Karstoft; Camilla Scheele Journal: Cell Rep Med Date: 2021-10-11
Authors: Katarzyna Maliszewska; Edyta Adamska-Patruno; K Miniewska; W Bauer; M Mojsak; A Kretowski Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-03-08 Impact factor: 4.379