Literature DB >> 35259986

Artificial selection for predatory behaviour results in dietary niche differentiation in an omnivorous mammal.

Anni Hämäläinen1,2, Mikko Kiljunen2, Esa Koskela2, Pawel Koteja1, Tapio Mappes2, Milla Rajala2, Katariina Tiainen2.   

Abstract

The diet of an individual is a result of the availability of dietary items and the individual's foraging skills and preferences. Behavioural differences may thus influence diet variation, but the evolvability of diet choice through behavioural evolution has not been studied. We used experimental evolution combined with a field enclosure experiment to test whether behavioural selection leads to dietary divergence. We analysed the individual dietary niche via stable isotope ratios of nitrogen (δ15N) and carbon (δ13C) in the hair of an omnivorous mammal, the bank vole, from four lines selected for predatory behaviour and four unselected control lines. Predatory voles had higher hair δ15N values than control voles, supporting our hypothesis that predatory voles would consume a higher trophic level diet (more animal versus plant foods). This difference was significant in the early but not the late summer season. The δ13C values also indicated a seasonal change in the consumed plant matter and a difference in food sources among selection lines in the early summer. These results imply that environmental factors interact with evolved behavioural tendencies to determine dietary niche heterogeneity. Behavioural selection thus has potential to contribute to the evolution of diet choice and ultimately the species' ecological niche breadth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bank vole; diet choice; predatory behaviour; specialization; stable isotopes; trophic niche

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35259986      PMCID: PMC8905149          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  33 in total

1.  The maximum attainable body size of herbivorous mammals: morphophysiological constraints on foregut, and adaptations of hindgut fermenters.

Authors:  M Clauss; R Frey; B Kiefer; M Lechner-Doll; W Loehlein; C Polster; G E Rössner; W J Streich
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2003-04-24       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The ecology of individuals: incidence and implications of individual specialization.

Authors:  Daniel I Bolnick; Richard Svanbäck; James A Fordyce; Louie H Yang; Jeremy M Davis; C Darrin Hulsey; Matthew L Forister
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12-11       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Intraspecific genetic variation and competition interact to influence niche expansion.

Authors:  Deepa Agashe; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Intraspecific competition drives increased resource use diversity within a natural population.

Authors:  Richard Svanbäck; Daniel I Bolnick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Food limitation leads to behavioral diversification and dietary specialization in sea otters.

Authors:  M Tim Tinker; Gena Bentall; James A Estes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Individual specialization in diet by a generalist marine predator reflects specialization in foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Kerry J Woo; Kyle Hamish Elliott; Melissa Davidson; Anthony J Gaston; Gail K Davoren
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Foraging syndromes and trait variation in antlions along a climatic gradient.

Authors:  Yehonatan Alcalay; Inon Scharf; Ofer Ovadia
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Competition and resource breadth shape niche variation and overlap in multiple trophic dimensions.

Authors:  Raul Costa-Pereira; Márcio S Araújo; Franco L Souza; Travis Ingram
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Reciprocal behavioral plasticity and behavioral types during predator-prey interactions.

Authors:  Katie E McGhee; Lauren M Pintor; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 10.  Does lipid-correction introduce biases into isotopic mixing models? Implications for diet reconstruction studies.

Authors:  Martin C Arostegui; Daniel E Schindler; Gordon W Holtgrieve
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  1 in total

1.  Artificial selection for predatory behaviour results in dietary niche differentiation in an omnivorous mammal.

Authors:  Anni Hämäläinen; Mikko Kiljunen; Esa Koskela; Pawel Koteja; Tapio Mappes; Milla Rajala; Katariina Tiainen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.