| Literature DB >> 35254544 |
Paolo Dell'Oglio1,2, Danny M van Willigen1, Matthias N van Oosterom1,3, Kevin Bauwens4, Fabian Hensbergen1, Mick M Welling1, Huijbert van der Stadt5, Elise Bekers6, Martin Pool7, Pim van Leeuwen3, Tobias Maurer8, Fijs W B van Leeuwen1,3, Tessa Buckle9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the rise of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioguided surgery, which is performed using a microdosing regime, demand for visual target confirmation via fluorescence guidance is growing. While proven very effective for radiotracers, microdosing approaches the detection limit for fluorescence imaging. Thus, utility will be highly dependent on the tracer performance, the sensitivity of the fluorescence camera used, and the degree of background signal. Using a porcine model the ability to perform robot-assisted radical prostatectomy under fluorescence guidance using the bimodal or rather hybrid PSMA tracer (99mTc-EuK-(SO3)Cy5-mas3) was studied, while employing the tracer in a microdosing regime. This was followed by ex vivo evaluation in surgical specimens obtained from prostate cancer patients.Entities:
Keywords: Fluorescence imaging; Image-guided surgery; Microdosing; PSMA; Prostate cancer; Robot-assisted surgery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35254544 PMCID: PMC8901828 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-022-00886-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Excretion of EuK‐(SO3)Cy5‐mas3 in a porcine model. A Anatomical overview of vascular and urinary tract (with location of kidney, bladder, and prostate (basal PSMA expression) highlighted). Image was created using 3D-pig-anatomy software from Biosphera. Insert: Structure of EuK‐(SO3)Cy5‐mas3 [25] with the Euk targeting moiety highlighted in green, the bridging (SO3)Cy5 dye in gray and the mas3 chelate in pink. B Excretion of EuK‐(SO3)Cy5‐mas3 from the blood (in blue) and urine (in orange) was measured over time after intravenous tracer administration (T = 0–T = 420 min). C Fluorescence confocal microscopy images of fresh excised tissue specimens obtained after in vivo imaging (red on black; top images per organ) and antibody-based PSMA immunohistochemistry (IHC; bottom images per organ) of these tissues
Fig. 2In vivo imaging of basal PSMA levels in the porcine prostate using clinical imaging equipment. A Imaging setup showing the operating surgeons (on the left) handing the Da Vinci surgical robot (center) and the Cy5-dedicated laparoscopic imaging setup from KARL STORZ (on the right; [26, 27]). B) In-house developed click-on multispectral filter wheel (*) enabling switching between white light imaging and Cy5 imaging. C In vivo visualization of the prostate using white light imaging (top), receptor-mediated PSMA imaging (basal expression) after intravenous administration of EuK‐(SO3)Cy5‐mas3 (center; red on black) and real-time color coding of the fluorescence signal and corresponding signal-to-background ratio (SBR) in the prostate using in-house developed software [26, 27]
Fig. 3Ex vivo PSMA-mediated imaging prostate cancer in human prostate samples. A White light image of prostate tissue obtained after prostatectomy of a prostate cancer patient. B Color-coded processing further highlighted the fluorescence uptake. Differences in tracer uptake throughout the tissue after ex vivo tissue incubation with EuK‐(SO3)Cy5‐mas3 were further highlighted through the representation of signal-to-background ratio (SBR). C Corresponding PSMA-related immunohistochemistry of the prostate specimen