Michael Mix1,2, Kathrin Reichel3, Christian Stoykow4, Mark Bartholomä4, Vanessa Drendel5, Eleni Gourni4,6, Ulrich Wetterauer3, Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann3, Philipp T Meyer4,7, Cordula A Jilg3. 1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. michael.mix@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 2. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Freiburg, Germany. michael.mix@uniklinik-freiburg.de. 3. Department of Urology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 4. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. 5. Institute for Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. 7. German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Freiburg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intraoperative identification of lymph node (LN) metastases (LNM) detected on preoperative PSMA PET/CT may be facilitated by PSMA radioguided surgery with the use of a gamma probe. We evaluated the uptake of 111In-labelled PSMA ligand DKFZ-617 (referred to as 111In-PSMA-617) in unaffected LN and LNM at the level of single LN. METHODS: Six patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with suspicion of LNM on preoperative PSMA PET/CT underwent 111In-PSMA-617-guided lymphadenectomy (LA; four salvage LA and two primary LA). 111In-PSMA-617 (109 ± 5 MBq). was injected Intravenously 48 h prior to surgery Template LAs were performed in small subregions: common, external, obturator and internal iliac vessels, and presacral and retroperitoneal subregions (n = 4). Samples from each subregion were isolated aiming at the level of single LN. Uptake was measured ex situ using a germanium detector. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed based on 111In-PSMA-617 uptake expressed as standardized uptake values normalized to lean body mass (SUL). RESULTS: Overall 310 LN (mean 52 ± 19.7) were removed from 74 subregions (mean 12 ± 3.7). Of the 310 LN, 35 turned out to be LNM on histopathology. Separation of the samples from all subregions resulted in 318 single specimens: 182 PCa-negative LN samples with 275 LN, 35 single LNM samples, 3 non-nodal PCa tissue samples and 98 fibrofatty tissue samples. The median SULs of nonaffected LN (0.16) and affected LN (13.2) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Based on 38 tumour-containing and 182 tumour-free specimens, ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.976 (95% CI 0.95-1.00, p < 0.0001). Using a SUL cut-off value of 1.136, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy in discriminating affected from nonaffected LN were 92.1% (35/38), 98.9% (180/182), 94.6% (35/37), 98.4% (180/183) and 97.7% (215/220), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ex situ analysis at the level of single LN showed that 111In-PSMA-617 had excellent ability to discriminate between affected and nonaffected LN in our patients with PCa. This tracer characteristic is a prerequisite for in vivo real-time measurements during surgery.
PURPOSE: Intraoperative identification of lymph node (LN) metastases (LNM) detected on preoperative PSMA PET/CT may be facilitated by PSMA radioguided surgery with the use of a gamma probe. We evaluated the uptake of 111In-labelled PSMA ligand DKFZ-617 (referred to as 111In-PSMA-617) in unaffected LN and LNM at the level of single LN. METHODS: Six patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with suspicion of LNM on preoperative PSMA PET/CT underwent 111In-PSMA-617-guided lymphadenectomy (LA; four salvage LA and two primary LA). 111In-PSMA-617 (109 ± 5 MBq). was injected Intravenously 48 h prior to surgery Template LAs were performed in small subregions: common, external, obturator and internal iliac vessels, and presacral and retroperitoneal subregions (n = 4). Samples from each subregion were isolated aiming at the level of single LN. Uptake was measured ex situ using a germanium detector. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed based on 111In-PSMA-617 uptake expressed as standardized uptake values normalized to lean body mass (SUL). RESULTS: Overall 310 LN (mean 52 ± 19.7) were removed from 74 subregions (mean 12 ± 3.7). Of the 310 LN, 35 turned out to be LNM on histopathology. Separation of the samples from all subregions resulted in 318 single specimens: 182 PCa-negative LN samples with 275 LN, 35 single LNM samples, 3 non-nodal PCa tissue samples and 98 fibrofatty tissue samples. The median SULs of nonaffected LN (0.16) and affected LN (13.2) were significantly different (p < 0.0001). Based on 38 tumour-containing and 182 tumour-free specimens, ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.976 (95% CI 0.95-1.00, p < 0.0001). Using a SUL cut-off value of 1.136, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy in discriminating affected from nonaffected LN were 92.1% (35/38), 98.9% (180/182), 94.6% (35/37), 98.4% (180/183) and 97.7% (215/220), respectively. CONCLUSION: Ex situ analysis at the level of single LN showed that 111In-PSMA-617 had excellent ability to discriminate between affected and nonaffected LN in our patients with PCa. This tracer characteristic is a prerequisite for in vivo real-time measurements during surgery.
Entities:
Keywords:
111In-PSMA; Lymph node metastases; Lymphadenectomy; Radioguided surgery
Authors: Sarayut Janmahasatian; Stephen B Duffull; Susan Ash; Leigh C Ward; Nuala M Byrne; Bruce Green Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2005 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Isabel Rauscher; Charlotte Düwel; Martina Wirtz; Margret Schottelius; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Kristina Schwamborn; Bernhard Haller; Markus Schwaiger; Jürgen E Gschwend; Matthias Eiber; Tobias Maurer Journal: BJU Int Date: 2016-12-04 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Nicolas Mottet; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Erik Briers; Marcus G Cumberbatch; Maria De Santis; Nicola Fossati; Tobias Gross; Ann M Henry; Steven Joniau; Thomas B Lam; Malcolm D Mason; Vsevolod B Matveev; Paul C Moldovan; Roderick C N van den Bergh; Thomas Van den Broeck; Henk G van der Poel; Theo H van der Kwast; Olivier Rouvière; Ivo G Schoots; Thomas Wiegel; Philip Cornford Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Shawn M Hillier; Kevin P Maresca; Genliang Lu; Ross D Merkin; John C Marquis; Craig N Zimmerman; William C Eckelman; John L Joyal; John W Babich Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2013-06-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Annika Herlemann; Vera Wenter; Alexander Kretschmer; Kolja M Thierfelder; Peter Bartenstein; Claudius Faber; Franz-Josef Gildehaus; Christian G Stief; Christian Gratzke; Wolfgang P Fendler Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Firas Abdollah; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nazareno Suardi; Umberto Capitanio; Andrea Salonia; Alessandro Nini; Marco Moschini; Maxine Sun; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Sharhokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Tobias Maurer; Gregor Weirich; Margret Schottelius; Martina Weineisen; Benjamin Frisch; Asli Okur; Hubert Kübler; Mark Thalgott; Nassir Navab; Markus Schwaiger; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Jürgen E Gschwend; Matthias Eiber Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-05-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Constantinos Zamboglou; Matthias Eiber; Thomas R Fassbender; Matthias Eder; Simon Kirste; Michael Bock; Oliver Schilling; Kathrin Reichel; Uulke A van der Heide; Anca L Grosu Journal: Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-11-05
Authors: Paolo Dell'Oglio; Danny M van Willigen; Matthias N van Oosterom; Kevin Bauwens; Fabian Hensbergen; Mick M Welling; Huijbert van der Stadt; Elise Bekers; Martin Pool; Pim van Leeuwen; Tobias Maurer; Fijs W B van Leeuwen; Tessa Buckle Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 3.138