| Literature DB >> 35254510 |
Ioana Maria Cazana1, Daniel Böhringer2, Thomas Reinhard2, Alexandra Anton3, Thomas Ness2, Jan Lübke2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Uveitic glaucoma remains challenging despite medical and surgical advancements and can potentially lead to blindness if left uncontrolled. Conservative alternatives as well as microinvasive surgeries can postpone the necessity of a highly invasive intervention. However, such procedures are still necessary to treat some refractive glaucoma cases. Since previous studies have reported excellent results following the primary implantation of glaucoma drainage devices, it was our study's aim to evaluate long-term results following a Baerveldt 250 implantation in highly complex and surgically burdened uveitic glaucoma eyes (UG) and compare these to a similar population suffering from other forms of glaucoma (OFG).Entities:
Keywords: Baerveldt implant; Drainage devices; Secondary inflammatory glaucoma; Shunts; Uveitic glaucoma
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35254510 PMCID: PMC9418105 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05612-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 0721-832X Impact factor: 3.535
Baseline pre-operative characteristics of the study population
| Baseline characteristics | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| UG | OFG | ||
| Number | 24 | 38 | |
| Sex (%) | 0.08 | ||
Female Male | 62.5 37.5 | 39.5 60.5 | |
| Age (years) | 52.79 | 51.11 | 0.93 |
| Lens status | 0.51 | ||
Phakic Pseudophakic Aphakic | 3 19 2 | 2 34 2 | |
Keratoplasty total (%) Penetrating keratoplasty DMEK DSAEK | 8.33 1 1 0 | 42.10 13 2 1 | 0.03 |
| Macular edema (%) | 12.50 | 2.63 | 0.31 |
| Uveitis location (%) | |||
Anterior Intermediate Pan-uveitis | 54 29 17 | ||
| IOP (mmHg) | 35.04 (± 11.85) | 32.63 (± 7.74) | 0.58 |
| Topical agents | 3.08 (± 1.13) | 2.68 (± 1.28) | 0.25 |
| Systemic acetazolamide (%) | 79% | 87% | 0.42 |
| Visual acuity (log MAR) | 0.38 (± 0.42) | 1.12 (± 0.83) | < 0.001 |
Glaucoma operations before BI 250 Traculectomy ab interno Trabeuculectomy ab externo Cyclophotocoagulation/cryocoagulation Iridectomy Molteno implant Cypass implant Goniotomy XEN implant SLT | 1.21 (± 0.66) 19 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 | 1.74 (± 1.33) 14 14 15 4 1 2 1 1 0 | 0.07 |
| Median follow-up (days) | 592 | 764 | 0.10 |
| Mean uveitis duration to surgery (months) | 146.72 | ||
| Other form of glaucoma (%): | |||
Congenital glaucoma Developmental glaucoma Iridocorneal endothelial syndrome Neovascular glaucoma Primary open angle glaucoma Angle closure glaucoma Pseudoexfoliative glaucoma Post-traumatic glaucoma Post-operative glaucoma | 8 3 8 3 26 8 5 13 26 | ||
Fig. 1Kaplan–Meier curve displaying the complete success rate for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red) (IOP < 21 mmHg without topical medication or systemic acetazolamide). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curve displaying the qualified success rate for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red) (IOP < 21 mmHg with either topical medication and/or systemic acetazolamide). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 3Kaplan–Meier curve depicting cases post-BI-250 without topical IOP lowering medication for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 4Kaplan–Meier curve depicting cases post-BI-250 without systemic acetazolamide for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meier curve depicting cases post-BI-250 without further glaucoma-related surgeries for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 6Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating macular edema prevalence post-BI-250 for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 7Kaplan–Meier curve depicting corneal edema prevalence post-BI-250 for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 8Kaplan–Meier curve illustrating visual acuity stability post-BI-250 for the UG group (teal) vs. OFG group (red). Censored cases appear as a dot
Fig. 9Visual acuity change post-BI-250 for the UG and OFG
Post-operative complications in both UG and OFG groups
| Post-operative complications | ||
|---|---|---|
| UG (%) | OFG (%) | |
| Hypotension (< 5 mmHg) | 25 | 18.42 |
| Revision due to hypotony | 50 | 71.43 |
| Endothelial-touch due to hypotony | 0 | 42.86 |
| Inflammation | 4.17 | 0 |
| Infection | 0 | 0 |
| Tube dislocation | 0 | 0 |
| Diplopia | 4.17 | 5.26 |
| Expulsive hemorrhage | 0 | 2.63 |
| Retinal detachment | 4.17 | 0 |
| Hypertension | 0 | 5.26 |