Literature DB >> 28921906

Outcomes of severe uveitic glaucoma treated with Baerveldt implant: can blindness be prevented?

Annelie N Tan1,2, Michiel F Cornelissen1, Carroll A B Webers1, Roel J Erckens1, Tos T J M Berendschot1, Henny J M Beckers1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate long-term outcomes on efficacy and safety of severe uveitic glaucoma treated with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI).
METHODS: A retrospective study of 47 eyes of 47 patients with uveitic glaucoma treated by a BGI between September 2002 and September 2015. Main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, course of the uveitis, visual acuity (VA) and complications.
RESULTS: Mean IOP dropped from 30.6 ± 8.1 mmHg with 3.6 ± 1.1 glaucoma medications at baseline to 10.6 ± 4.3 mmHg with 1.0 ± 1.3 glaucoma medications after a mean follow-up of 63.6 ± 43.1 months. In the majority of cases, IOP remained stable during follow-up. However, especially in several patients with viral uveitis, episodes with IOP peaks were observed during a flare-up despite a functioning implant. These peaks remained below preoperative levels. During follow-up, 16 patients (34%) experienced a clinically significant VA loss, mainly because of late-stage glaucoma or hypotony maculopathy. Early postoperative complications were transient choroidal effusion (n = 5), shallow/flat anterior chamber (n = 4), hyphaema (n = 2) and suprachoroidal haemorrhage (n = 1). The most important late postoperative complication was hypotony maculopathy (n = 5), three of these in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) patients.
CONCLUSION: The BGI is an effective and safe treatment for patients with refractive secondary glaucoma due to uveitis. In a majority of patients, VA remains stable and a low and stable IOP is maintained over time with an acceptable number of complications. In particular, patients with viral uveitis and glaucoma should be closely monitored for IOP peaks that may occur during episodes of a flare-up of uveitis, whereas at the other end of the spectrum, patients with JIA seem much more prone to hypotony maculopathy.
© 2017 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baerveldt glaucoma implant; glaucoma; intraocular pressure; uveitic glaucoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28921906     DOI: 10.1111/aos.13489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  5 in total

1.  Optic Nerve Traction During Adduction in Open Angle Glaucoma with Normal versus Elevated Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark; Soh Youn Suh; Joann A Giaconi; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Simon K Law; Laura Bonelli; Anne L Coleman; Joseph Caprioli
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.424

2.  Bilaminar Structure of the Human Optic Nerve Sheath.

Authors:  Alan Le; Andrew Shin; Joseph Park; Vadims Poukens; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 2.424

3.  Fuchs heterochromic iridocyclitis-associated glaucoma: a retrospective comparison of primary Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C.

Authors:  Hamed Esfandiari; Nils A Loewen; Kiana Hassanpour; Ali Fatourechi; Shahin Yazdani; Chao Wang; Mehdi Yaseri; Mohammad Pakravan
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-22

4.  Orbital Fat Volume After Treatment with Topical Prostaglandin Agonists.

Authors:  Jessica Y Chen; Alan Le; Joseph Caprioli; JoAnn A Giaconi; Kouros Nouri-Mahdavi; Simon K Law; Laura Bonelli; Anne L Coleman; Joseph L Demer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A comparison of long-term results after Baerveldt 250 implantation in advanced uveitic vs. other forms of glaucoma.

Authors:  Ioana Maria Cazana; Daniel Böhringer; Thomas Reinhard; Alexandra Anton; Thomas Ness; Jan Lübke
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.535

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.