| Literature DB >> 35252319 |
Zhiwen Wang1, Yuxin Chen2, Xinhui Zhou3, Changfeng Wang1, Xianjun Chen1, Feixiang Min1, Ruen Liu1,4, Hui Xiang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Cerebrospinal fluid total protein (CSF-TP) levels in adults with posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH) are poorly studied. The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics of CSF-TP levels in patients with PHH.Entities:
Keywords: GCS; cerebrospinal fluid total protein; intracerebral hemorrhage; intraventricular hemorrhage; posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus; subarachnoid space hemorrhage; traumatic brain injuries
Year: 2022 PMID: 35252319 PMCID: PMC8891476 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.692383
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Case inclusion process. A total of 3,947 patients with hemorrhagic brain diseases were treated in our hospital, and 156 patients were selected for retrospective study.
Univariate analysis of the association between potential risk factors and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus (PHH).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 36 | 36 | 0.297 |
| Female | 49 | 35 | ||
| Age (year) | 62.341 ± 10.858 | 55.831 ± 13.731 |
| |
| Diabetes | Yes | 6 | 3 | 0.681 |
| No | 79 | 68 | ||
| Hypertension | Yes | 51 | 29 |
|
| No | 34 | 42 | ||
| Days | 5.071 ± 3.693 | 3.887 ± 3.323 |
| |
| GCS | 8.400 ± 3.367 | 11.028 ± 3.664 |
| |
| CSF-TP (mg/L) | 1,159.988 ± 764.418 | 1,061.127 ± 652.251 | 0.441 | |
| Time | 15.624 ± 7.561 | 9.507 ± 4.581 |
|
Results are expressed as number (%) for categorical variables and mean (± SD) for numerical variables.
GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; CSF-TP, cerebrospinal fluid-total protein; PHH, posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus; NPHH, non-PHH.
The difference has statistical significance. The bold values mean that the P-values have statistical significance.
Multivariate analysis of important factors.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.064 (1.026–1.104) |
|
| Hypertension | 1.603 (0.717–3.586) | 0.251 |
| Days | 1.082 (0.959–1.220) |
|
| GCS | 0.802 (0.717–0.896) |
|
| CSF-TP × time | 1.000 (1.000–1.000) |
|
GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; CSF-TP × time, cerebrospinal fluid-total protein × time; CI, confidence interval.
The difference has statistical significance. The bold values mean that the P-values have statistical significance.
Multivariate logistic analysis of the derivation cohort of PHH.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Age ≥ 60 | 1.667 (0.791–3.513) | 0.179 |
| Hypertension | 1.845 (0.892–3.817) | 0.099 |
| Days ≥ 5 | 1.468 (0.685–3.146) | 0.324 |
| GCS <8 | 2.943 (1.421–6.097) |
|
| CSF-TP × time (≥9,600) | 2.317 (1.108–4.849) |
|
GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; CSF-TP × time, cerebrospinal fluid-total protein × time; CI, confidence interval.
The difference has statistical significance. The bold values mean that the P-values have statistical significance.
Figure 2Distribution of CSF-TP in PHH and NPHH groups. X-axis:0 means the beginning of the disease.
Figure 3Distribution of CSF-TP after grouping the Time by 2 days. X-axis:0 means the beginning of the disease.
PHH after grouping CSF-TP and time group.
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||
| 0–4 | Yes | 0 | 1 (16.7) | 0 (0) |
| No | 0 | 5 (83.3) | 2 (100) | |
| 5–8 | Yes | 1 | 4 (19.0) | 7 (36.8) |
| No | 1 | 17 (81.0) | 12 (63.2) | |
| 9–12 | Yes | 0 | 7 (41.2) | 14 (73.7) |
| No | 2 | 10 (58.8) | 5 (26.3) | |
| 13–16 | Yes | 1 | 12 (63.2) | 7 (63.6) |
| No | 2 | 7 (26.8) | 4 (26.4) | |
| >16 | Yes | 9 | 15 (78.9) | 7 (100) |
| No | 0 | 4 (21.1) | 0 (0) | |
CSF-TP, Cerebrospinal fluid-total protein.
Results are expressed as numbers (%) for categorical variables.
Figure 4PHH-R in 400–1,200 group and >1,200 group. PHH-R, Rate of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus.