Literature DB >> 28391551

Predicting posttraumatic hydrocephalus: derivation and validation of a risk scoring system based on clinical characteristics.

Hao Chen1, Fang Yuan1, Shi-Wen Chen1, Yan Guo1, Gan Wang1, Zhi-Feng Deng1, Heng-Li Tian2.   

Abstract

Posttraumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is a disorder of disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics after traumatic brain injury (TBI). It can lead to brain metabolic impairment and dysfunction and has a high risk of clinical deterioration and worse outcomes. The incidence and risk factors for the development of PTH after decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been assessed in previous studies, but rare studies identify patients with higher risk for PTH among all TBI patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a risk scoring system to predict PTH after TBI. Demographics, injury severity, duration of coma, radiologic findings, and DC were evaluated to determine the independent predictors of PTH during hospitalization until 6 months following TBI through logistic regression analysis. A risk stratification system was created by assigning a number of points for each predictor and validated in an independent cohort. The model accuracy was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Of 526 patients in the derivation cohort, 57 (10.84%) developed PTH during 6 months follow up. Age > 50 yrs (Odd ratio [OR] = 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09-3.75, 4 points), duration of coma ≥1 w (OR = 5.68, 95% CI 2.57-13.47, 9 points), Fisher grade III (OR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.24-4.36, 5 points) or IV (OR = 3.87, 95% CI 1.93-8.43, 7 points), bilateral DC (OR = 6.13, 95% CI 2.82-18.14, 9 points), and extra herniation after DC (OR = 2.36, 95% CI 1.46-4.92, 5 points) were independently associated with PTH. Rates of PTH for the low- (0-12 points), intermediate- (13-22 points) and high-risk (23-34 points) groups were 1.16%, 35.19% and 78.57% (p < 0.0001). The corresponding rates in the validation cohort, where 17/175 (9.71%) developed PTH, were 1.35%, 37.50% and 81.82% (p < 0.0001). The risk score model exhibited good-excellent discrimination in both cohorts, with AUC of 0.839 versus 0.894 (derivation versus validation) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemshow p = 0.56 versus 0.68). This model will be useful to identify patients at high risk for PTH who may be candidates for preventive interventions, and to improve their outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Posttraumatic hydrocephalus; Prognostic model; Risk score; Traumatic brain injury; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28391551     DOI: 10.1007/s11011-017-0008-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Metab Brain Dis        ISSN: 0885-7490            Impact factor:   3.584


  32 in total

Review 1.  Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: a review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Authors:  G M Teasdale; L E Pettigrew; J T Wilson; G Murray; B Jennett
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.269

2.  Interhemispheric hygroma after decompressive craniectomy: does it predict posttraumatic hydrocephalus?

Authors:  Ariel Kaen; Luis Jimenez-Roldan; Rafael Alday; Pedro A Gomez; Alfonso Lagares; José Fernández Alén; Ramiro D Lobato
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Decompressive craniectomy, interhemispheric hygroma and hydrocephalus: a timeline of events?

Authors:  Pasquale De Bonis; Carmelo Lucio Sturiale; Carmelo Anile; Simona Gaudino; Annunziato Mangiola; Matia Martucci; Cesare Colosimo; Luigi Rigante; Angelo Pompucci
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 4.  Post-traumatic hydrocephalus.

Authors:  L L Guyot; D B Michael
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Computed tomography in the evaluation of incidence and significance of post-traumatic hydrocephalus.

Authors:  S K Gudeman; P R Kishore; D P Becker; M H Lipper; A K Girevendulis; B F Jeffries; J F Butterworth
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Theories of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and hydrocephalus: historical trend.

Authors:  Nigel Peter Symss; Shizuo Oi
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Influencing factors for posttraumatic hydrocephalus in patients suffering from severe traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  Qing-fang Jiao; Zhan Liu; Song Li; Liang-xue Zhou; San-zhong Li; Wei Tian; Chao You
Journal:  Chin J Traumatol       Date:  2007-06

8.  Predicting progressive hemorrhagic injury after traumatic brain injury: derivation and validation of a risk score based on admission characteristics.

Authors:  Fang Yuan; Jun Ding; Hao Chen; Yan Guo; Gan Wang; Wen-Wei Gao; Shi-Wen Chen; Heng-Li Tian
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Hydrocephalus following severe traumatic brain injury in adults. Incidence, timing, and clinical predictors during rehabilitation.

Authors:  Lars Peter Kammersgaard; Mia Linnemann; Maiken Tibæk
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.138

10.  Age dependence of cerebrospinal pressure-volume compensation in patients with hydrocephalus.

Authors:  M Czosnyka; Z H Czosnyka; P C Whitfield; T Donovan; J D Pickard
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  8 in total

1.  Postoperative complications influencing the long-term outcome of head-injured patients after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Guangfu Di; Yuhai Zhang; Hua Liu; Xiaochun Jiang; Yong Liu; Kun Yang; Jiu Chen; Hongyi Liu
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.708

2.  Risk Factor of Posthemorrhagic Hydrocephalus: Cerebrospinal Fluid Total Protein.

Authors:  Zhiwen Wang; Yuxin Chen; Xinhui Zhou; Changfeng Wang; Xianjun Chen; Feixiang Min; Ruen Liu; Hui Xiang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-17

3.  Prediction of adult post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus: a risk score based on clinical data.

Authors:  Bin Xi; Junhui Zhou; Zhiwen Wang; Bingxiao Yu; Min Wang; Changfeng Wang; Ruen Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Incidence of surgically treated post-traumatic hydrocephalus 6 months following head injury in patients undergoing acute head computed tomography.

Authors:  Aaro Heinonen; Minna Rauhala; Harri Isokuortti; Anneli Kataja; Milaja Nikula; Juha Öhman; Grant L Iverson; Teemu Luoto
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 2.816

5.  Decompressive Craniectomy and Shunt-Amenable Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Damilola Jesuyajolu; Terngu Moti; Abdulahi Zubair; Adnan Alnaser; Ahmed Zanaty; Tom Grundy; Julian Evans
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2022-09-13

6.  Incidence of post-traumatic hydrocephalus in traumatic brain injury patients that underwent DC versus those that were managed without DC: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Georgios Mavrovounis; Adamantios Kalogeras; Alexandros Brotis; Corrado Iaccarino; Andreas K Demetriades; Konstantinos N Fountas
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-10-22

7.  Predictors Associated With Post-Traumatic Hydrocephalus in Patients With Head Injury Undergoing Unilateral Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Qianxin Hu; Guangfu Di; Xuefei Shao; Wei Zhou; Xiaochun Jiang
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  From Shunt to Recovery: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Hydrocephalus Treatment in Severe Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Giovanna B Castellani; Giovanni Miccoli; Francesca C Cava; Pamela Salucci; Valentina Colombo; Elisa Maietti; Giorgio Palandri
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-21
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.