Christopher R McCudden1, John Brooks2, Priya Figurado2, Pierre R Bourque2,3. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Division of Biochemistry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; cmccudde@uottawa.ca. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of Neurology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. 3. The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reference intervals are vital for interpretation of laboratory results. Many existing reference intervals for cerebrospinal fluid total protein (CSF-TP) are derived from old literature because of the invasive nature of sampling. The objective of this study was to determine reference intervals for CSF-TP using available patient data. METHODS: Twenty years of hospital database information was mined for previously reported CSF-TP results. Associated demographic, laboratory, and clinical diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes) details were extracted. CSF-TP results included 3 different analytical platforms: the Siemens Vista 1500, Beckman Lx20, and Roche Hitachi 917. From an initial data set of 19591 samples, the following exclusion criteria were applied: incomplete data, white blood cells (WBCs) >5 × 106/L, red blood cells (RBCs) >50 × 106/L, and glucose <2.5 mmol/L. Patient charts were reviewed in detail to exclude 60 different conditions for which increases in CSF-TP would be expected. A total of 6068 samples were included; 63% of the samples were from females. Continuous reference intervals were determined using quantile regression. Age- and sex-partitioned intervals were established using the quantile regression equation and splitting age-groups into 5-year bins. RESULTS: CSF-TP showed a marked age dependence, and males had significantly higher CSF-TP than females across all ages. CSF-TP results from the 3 different instruments and manufacturers showed small (approximately 0.04 g/L), but statistically significant, differences. CSF-TP showed weak, but again statistically significant, correlation with WBC and RBC but was independent of serum total protein and creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: The age dependence of CSF-TP supports that age-partitioned reference intervals will be more accurate than a single cutoff, particularly in patients with advancing age.
BACKGROUND: Reference intervals are vital for interpretation of laboratory results. Many existing reference intervals for cerebrospinal fluid total protein (CSF-TP) are derived from old literature because of the invasive nature of sampling. The objective of this study was to determine reference intervals for CSF-TP using available patient data. METHODS: Twenty years of hospital database information was mined for previously reported CSF-TP results. Associated demographic, laboratory, and clinical diagnosis (International Classification of Diseases 9/10 codes) details were extracted. CSF-TP results included 3 different analytical platforms: the Siemens Vista 1500, Beckman Lx20, and Roche Hitachi 917. From an initial data set of 19591 samples, the following exclusion criteria were applied: incomplete data, white blood cells (WBCs) >5 × 106/L, red blood cells (RBCs) >50 × 106/L, and glucose <2.5 mmol/L. Patient charts were reviewed in detail to exclude 60 different conditions for which increases in CSF-TP would be expected. A total of 6068 samples were included; 63% of the samples were from females. Continuous reference intervals were determined using quantile regression. Age- and sex-partitioned intervals were established using the quantile regression equation and splitting age-groups into 5-year bins. RESULTS: CSF-TP showed a marked age dependence, and males had significantly higher CSF-TP than females across all ages. CSF-TP results from the 3 different instruments and manufacturers showed small (approximately 0.04 g/L), but statistically significant, differences. CSF-TP showed weak, but again statistically significant, correlation with WBC and RBC but was independent of serum total protein and creatinine. CONCLUSIONS: The age dependence of CSF-TP supports that age-partitioned reference intervals will be more accurate than a single cutoff, particularly in patients with advancing age.
Authors: Eric Vallabh Minikel; Eric Kuhn; Alexandra R Cocco; Sonia M Vallabh; Christina R Hartigan; Andrew G Reidenbach; Jiri G Safar; Gregory J Raymond; Michael D McCarthy; Rhonda O'Keefe; Franc Llorens; Inga Zerr; Sabina Capellari; Piero Parchi; Stuart L Schreiber; Steven A Carr Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Pierre R Bourque; John Brooks; Jodi Warman-Chardon; Harald Hegen; Florian Deisenhammer; Chris R McCudden; Ari Breiner Journal: Data Brief Date: 2019-03-07
Authors: Klaus Berek; Gabriel Bsteh; Michael Auer; Franziska Di Pauli; Anne Zinganell; Thomas Berger; Florian Deisenhammer; Harald Hegen Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 7.561